These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17257742)

  • 1. Cancer detection and cancer characteristics in the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC)--Section Rotterdam. A comparison of two rounds of screening.
    Postma R; Schröder FH; van Leenders GJ; Hoedemaeker RF; Vis AN; Roobol MJ; van der Kwast TH
    Eur Urol; 2007 Jul; 52(1):89-97. PubMed ID: 17257742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Is it necessary to detect all prostate cancers in men with serum PSA levels <3.0 ng/ml? A comparison of biopsy results of PCPT and outcome-related information from ERSPC.
    Schröder FH; Bangma CH; Roobol MJ
    Eur Urol; 2008 May; 53(5):901-8. PubMed ID: 18262712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Potentially advanced malignancies detected by screening for prostate carcinoma after an interval of 4 years.
    Postma R; Roobol M; Schröder FH; van der Kwast TH
    Cancer; 2004 Mar; 100(5):968-75. PubMed ID: 14983492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. hK2 and free PSA, a prognostic combination in predicting minimal prostate cancer in screen-detected men within the PSA range 4-10 ng/ml.
    Raaijmakers R; de Vries SH; Blijenberg BG; Wildhagen MF; Postma R; Bangma CH; Darte C; Schröder FH
    Eur Urol; 2007 Nov; 52(5):1358-64. PubMed ID: 17499425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prostate biopsy: who, how and when. An update.
    Djavan B; Milani S; Remzi M
    Can J Urol; 2005 Feb; 12 Suppl 1():44-8; discussion 99-100. PubMed ID: 15780165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. No reason for immediate repeat sextant biopsy after negative initial sextant biopsy in men with PSA level of 4.0 ng/mL or greater (ERSPC, Rotterdam).
    Roobol MJ; van der Cruijsen IW; Schröder FH
    Urology; 2004 May; 63(5):892-7; discussion 897-9. PubMed ID: 15134973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Incidence and follow-up of patients with focal prostate carcinoma in 2 screening rounds after an interval of 4 years.
    Postma R; de Vries SH; Roobol MJ; Wildhagen MF; Schröder FH; van der Kwast TH
    Cancer; 2005 Feb; 103(4):708-16. PubMed ID: 15648082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Tumor characteristics and prognostic factors in two subsequent screening rounds with four-year interval within prostate cancer screening trial, ERSPC Rotterdam.
    van der Cruijsen-Koeter IW; Roobol MJ; Wildhagen MF; van der Kwast TH; Kirkels WJ; Schröder FH
    Urology; 2006 Sep; 68(3):615-20. PubMed ID: 17010732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Should we replace the Gleason score with the amount of high-grade prostate cancer?
    Vis AN; Roemeling S; Kranse R; Schröder FH; van der Kwast TH
    Eur Urol; 2007 Apr; 51(4):931-9. PubMed ID: 16935413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prostate-specific antigen velocity at low prostate-specific antigen levels as screening tool for prostate cancer: results of second screening round of ERSPC (ROTTERDAM).
    Roobol MJ; Kranse R; de Koning HJ; Schröder FH
    Urology; 2004 Feb; 63(2):309-13; discussion 313-5. PubMed ID: 14972478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Tumour features in the control and screening arm of a randomized trial of prostate cancer.
    Postma R; van Leenders AG; Roobol MJ; Schröder FH; van der Kwast TH
    Eur Urol; 2006 Jul; 50(1):70-5. PubMed ID: 16434136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Features of prostate cancers detected during a prevalence screening round. The Rotterdam experience.
    Van der Kwast TH; Postma R; Hoedemaeker RF; van Leenders GJ; Schröder FH
    Can J Urol; 2005 Jun; 12 Suppl 2():16-20. PubMed ID: 16018827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Interval cancers in prostate cancer screening: comparing 2- and 4-year screening intervals in the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer, Gothenburg and Rotterdam.
    Roobol MJ; Grenabo A; Schröder FH; Hugosson J
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2007 Sep; 99(17):1296-303. PubMed ID: 17728218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Detection of prostate cancer: the impact of the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC).
    Schröder FH
    Can J Urol; 2005 Feb; 12 Suppl 1():2-6; discussion 92-3. PubMed ID: 15780157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Long-term radical prostatectomy outcomes among participants from the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) Rotterdam.
    Loeb S; Zhu X; Schroder FH; Roobol MJ
    BJU Int; 2012 Dec; 110(11):1678-83. PubMed ID: 22998182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Extent of prostate-specific antigen contamination in the Spanish section of the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC).
    Luján M; Páez A; Pascual C; Angulo J; Miravalles E; Berenguer A
    Eur Urol; 2006 Dec; 50(6):1234-40; discussion 1239-40. PubMed ID: 16704893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prostate-specific antigen change in the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer, section Rotterdam.
    Raaijmakers R; Wildhagen MF; Ito K; Pàez A; de Vries SH; Roobol MJ; Schröder FH
    Urology; 2004 Feb; 63(2):316-20. PubMed ID: 14972481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. 4-year prostate specific antigen progression and diagnosis of prostate cancer in the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer, section Rotterdam.
    Schröder FH; Raaijmakers R; Postma R; van der Kwast TH; Roobol MJ
    J Urol; 2005 Aug; 174(2):489-94; discussion 493-4. PubMed ID: 16006878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Lesions predictive for prostate cancer in a screened population: first and second screening round findings.
    Postma R; Roobol M; Schröder FH; van der Kwast TH
    Prostate; 2004 Nov; 61(3):260-6. PubMed ID: 15368469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The role of the digital rectal examination in subsequent screening visits in the European randomized study of screening for prostate cancer (ERSPC), Rotterdam.
    Gosselaar C; Roobol MJ; Roemeling S; Schröder FH
    Eur Urol; 2008 Sep; 54(3):581-8. PubMed ID: 18423977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.