These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
311 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17257790)
1. Auditory stream segregation of tone sequences in cochlear implant listeners. Cooper HR; Roberts B Hear Res; 2007 Mar; 225(1-2):11-24. PubMed ID: 17257790 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Auditory stream segregation in cochlear implant listeners: measures based on temporal discrimination and interleaved melody recognition. Cooper HR; Roberts B J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Oct; 126(4):1975-87. PubMed ID: 19813809 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of context on auditory stream segregation. Snyder JS; Carter OL; Lee SK; Hannon EE; Alain C J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Aug; 34(4):1007-16. PubMed ID: 18665741 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. What breaks a melody: perceiving F0 and intensity sequences with a cochlear implant. Cousineau M; Demany L; Meyer B; Pressnitzer D Hear Res; 2010 Oct; 269(1-2):34-41. PubMed ID: 20674733 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Primitive auditory stream segregation: a neurophysiological study in the songbird forebrain. Bee MA; Klump GM J Neurophysiol; 2004 Aug; 92(2):1088-104. PubMed ID: 15044521 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Perceptual organization of sequential stimuli in cochlear implant listeners: A temporal processing approach. Saki N; Nikakhlagh S; Mirmomeni G; Bayat A Int Tinnitus J; 2019 Jan; 23(1):37-41. PubMed ID: 31469526 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Broadband auditory stream segregation by hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners. Valentine S; Lentz JJ J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2008 Oct; 51(5):1341-52. PubMed ID: 18664686 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Auditory streaming based on temporal structure in hearing-impaired listeners. Stainsby TH; Moore BC; Glasberg BR Hear Res; 2004 Jun; 192(1-2):119-30. PubMed ID: 15157970 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Timbre discrimination in cochlear implant users and normal hearing subjects using cross-faded synthetic tones. Rahne T; Böhme L; Götze G J Neurosci Methods; 2011 Aug; 199(2):290-5. PubMed ID: 21664377 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of differences in the pattern of amplitude envelopes across harmonics on auditory stream segregation. Cusack R; Roberts B Hear Res; 2004 Jul; 193(1-2):95-104. PubMed ID: 15219324 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Pitch perception in patients with a multi-channel cochlear implant using various pulses width. Aronson L; Rosenhouse J; Podoshin L; Rosenhouse G; Zanutto SB Med Prog Technol; 1994; 20(1-2):43-51. PubMed ID: 7968864 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Sequential stream segregation in normally-hearing and cochlear-implant listeners. Tejani VD; Schvartz-Leyzac KC; Chatterjee M J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Jan; 141(1):50. PubMed ID: 28147600 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. ARTSTREAM: a neural network model of auditory scene analysis and source segregation. Grossberg S; Govindarajan KK; Wyse LL; Cohen MA Neural Netw; 2004 May; 17(4):511-36. PubMed ID: 15109681 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Perceptual fusion of polyphonic pitch in cochlear implant users. Donnelly PJ; Guo BZ; Limb CJ J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Nov; 126(5):EL128-33. PubMed ID: 19894787 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Active stream segregation specifically involves the left human auditory cortex. Deike S; Scheich H; Brechmann A Hear Res; 2010 Jun; 265(1-2):30-7. PubMed ID: 20233603 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Pitch ranking of complex tones by normally hearing subjects and cochlear implant users. Sucher CM; McDermott HJ Hear Res; 2007 Aug; 230(1-2):80-7. PubMed ID: 17604582 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Auditory pre-attentive processing of Chinese tones. Yang LJ; Cao KL; Wei CG; Liu YZ Chin Med J (Engl); 2008 Dec; 121(23):2429-33. PubMed ID: 19102963 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessing the pitch structure associated with multiple rates and places for cochlear implant users. Stohl JS; Throckmorton CS; Collins LM J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Feb; 123(2):1043-53. PubMed ID: 18247906 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical assessment of music perception in Korean cochlear implant listeners. Jung KH; Cho YS; Cho JK; Park GY; Kim EY; Hong SH; Chung WH; Won JH; Rubinstein JT Acta Otolaryngol; 2010 Jun; 130(6):716-23. PubMed ID: 19958251 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]