200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17259581)
1. Power, propensity to negotiate, and moving first in competitive interactions.
Magee JC; Galinsky AD; Gruenfeld DH
Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2007 Feb; 33(2):200-12. PubMed ID: 17259581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The role of the self-concept and the social context in determining the behavior of power holders: self-construal in intergroup versus dyadic dispute resolution negotiations.
Howard ES; Gardner WL; Thompson L
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2007 Oct; 93(4):614-31. PubMed ID: 17892335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Motivated information processing, strategic choice, and the quality of negotiated agreement.
De Dreu CK; Beersma B; Stroebe K; Euwema MC
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2006 Jun; 90(6):927-43. PubMed ID: 16784343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Who goes to the bargaining table? The influence of gender and framing on the initiation of negotiation.
Small DA; Gelfand M; Babcock L; Gettman H
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2007 Oct; 93(4):600-13. PubMed ID: 17892334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Anchors weigh more than power: why absolute powerlessness liberates negotiators to achieve better outcomes.
Schaerer M; Swaab RI; Galinsky AD
Psychol Sci; 2015 Feb; 26(2):170-81. PubMed ID: 25502144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Negotiation as a form of persuasion: arguments in first offers.
Maaravi Y; Ganzach Y; Pazy A
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2011 Aug; 101(2):245-55. PubMed ID: 21500924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The remarkable robustness of the first-offer effect: across culture, power, and issues.
Gunia BC; Swaab RI; Sivanathan N; Galinsky AD
Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2013 Dec; 39(12):1547-58. PubMed ID: 23950554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The interpersonal effects of emotions in negotiations: a motivated information processing approach.
Van Kleef GA; De Dreu CK; Manstead AS
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2004 Oct; 87(4):510-28. PubMed ID: 15491275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Negotiators' bargaining histories and their effects on future negotiation performance.
O'connor KM; Arnold JA; Burris ER
J Appl Psychol; 2005 Mar; 90(2):350-62. PubMed ID: 15769243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Regulatory focus at the bargaining table: promoting distributive and integrative success.
Galinsky AD; Leonardelli GJ; Okhuysen GA; Mussweiler T
Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2005 Aug; 31(8):1087-98. PubMed ID: 16000269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. When is straightforwardness a liability in negotiations? The role of integrative potential and structural power.
Derue DS; Conlon DE; Moon H; Willaby HW
J Appl Psychol; 2009 Jul; 94(4):1032-47. PubMed ID: 19594242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. From power to action.
Galinsky AD; Gruenfeld DH; Magee JC
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2003 Sep; 85(3):453-66. PubMed ID: 14498782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Supplication and appeasement in conflict and negotiation: The interpersonal effects of disappointment, worry, guilt, and regret.
Van Kleef GA; De Dreu CK; Manstead AS
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2006 Jul; 91(1):124-42. PubMed ID: 16834484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Power reduces the press of the situation: implications for creativity, conformity, and dissonance.
Galinsky AD; Magee JC; Gruenfeld DH; Whitson JA; Liljenquist KA
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2008 Dec; 95(6):1450-66. PubMed ID: 19025295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Team negotiation: social, epistemic, economic, and psychological consequences of subgroup conflict.
Halevy N
Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2008 Dec; 34(12):1687-702. PubMed ID: 18832517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Give a person power and he or she will show interpersonal sensitivity: the phenomenon and its why and when.
Schmid Mast M; Jonas K; Hall JA
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2009 Nov; 97(5):835-50. PubMed ID: 19857005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. From self-prediction to self-defeat: behavioral forecasting, self-fulfilling prophecies, and the effect of competitive expectations.
Diekmann KA; Tenbrunsel AE; Galinsky AD
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2003 Oct; 85(4):672-83. PubMed ID: 14561121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Initial ownership in bargaining: introducing the giving, splitting, and taking ultimatum bargaining game.
Leliveld MC; van Dijk E; van Beest I
Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2008 Sep; 34(9):1214-25. PubMed ID: 18587058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Stereotype reactance at the bargaining table: the effect of stereotype activation and power on claiming and creating value.
Kray LJ; Reb J; Galinsky AD; Thompson L
Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2004 Apr; 30(4):399-411. PubMed ID: 15070470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. It takes one to tango: the effects of dyads' epistemic motivation composition in negotiation.
Ten Velden FS; Beersma B; De Dreu CK
Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2010 Nov; 36(11):1454-66. PubMed ID: 20841436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
