133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17260198)
1. Anatomy of the greater femoral trochanter: clinical importance for intramedullary femoral nailing. Anatomic study of 100 cadaver specimens.
Grechenig W; Pichler W; Clement H; Tesch NP; Grechenig S
Acta Orthop; 2006 Dec; 77(6):899-901. PubMed ID: 17260198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Three-dimensional correlation between trochanteric fossa and the ideal entry point for antegrade femoral nailing.
Byun YS; Jung GH
Injury; 2016 Nov; 47(11):2539-2543. PubMed ID: 27665226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Lateral insertion points in antegrade femoral nailing and their influence on femoral bone strains.
Linke B; Ansari Moein C; Bösl O; Verhofstad MH; van der Werken C; Schwieger K; Ito K
J Orthop Trauma; 2008; 22(10):716-22. PubMed ID: 18978548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A critical analysis of the eccentric starting point for trochanteric intramedullary femoral nailing.
Ostrum RF; Marcantonio A; Marburger R
J Orthop Trauma; 2005; 19(10):681-6. PubMed ID: 16314714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An anatomical study of the entry point in the greater trochanter for intramedullary nailing.
Farhang K; Desai R; Wilber JH; Cooperman DR; Liu RW
Bone Joint J; 2014 Sep; 96-B(9):1274-81. PubMed ID: 25183603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The impact of antegrade intramedullary nailing start site using the SIGN nail in proximal femoral fractures: A prospective cohort study.
Mustafa Diab M; Wu HH; Eliezer E; Haonga B; Morshed S; Shearer DW
Injury; 2018 Feb; 49(2):323-327. PubMed ID: 29162265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Computer-assisted three-dimensional correlation between the femoral neck-shaft angle and the optimal entry point for antegrade nailing.
Anastopoulos G; Chissas D; Dourountakis J; Ntagiopoulos PG; Magnisalis E; Asimakopoulos A; Xenakis TA
Injury; 2010 Mar; 41(3):300-5. PubMed ID: 20176170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Entry sites for antegrade femoral nailing.
Georgiadis GM; Olexa TA; Ebraheim NA
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1996 Sep; (330):281-7. PubMed ID: 8804303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Femoral bone strains during antegrade nailing: a comparison of two entry points with identical nails using finite element analysis.
Tupis TM; Altman GT; Altman DT; Cook HA; Miller MC
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2012 May; 27(4):354-9. PubMed ID: 22137147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Trochanteric versus piriformis entry portal for the treatment of femoral shaft fractures.
Ricci WM; Schwappach J; Tucker M; Coupe K; Brandt A; Sanders R; Leighton R
J Orthop Trauma; 2006; 20(10):663-7. PubMed ID: 17106375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Trochanteric entry femoral nails yield better femoral version and lower revision rates-A large cohort multivariate regression analysis.
Yoon RS; Gage MJ; Galos DK; Donegan DJ; Liporace FA
Injury; 2017 Jun; 48(6):1165-1169. PubMed ID: 28365071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Antegrade femoral nailing: an anatomical determination of the correct entry point.
Gausepohl T; Pennig D; Koebke J; Harnoss S
Injury; 2002 Oct; 33(8):701-5. PubMed ID: 12213421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Soft tissue injury related to choice of entry point in antegrade femoral nailing: piriform fossa or greater trochanter tip.
Ansari Moein CM; Verhofstad MH; Bleys RL; van der Werken C
Injury; 2005 Nov; 36(11):1337-42. PubMed ID: 16137692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effect of antegrade femoral nailing on femoral head perfusion: a comparison of piriformis fossa and trochanteric entry points.
Schottel PC; Hinds RM; Lazaro LE; Klinger C; Ni A; Dyke JP; Helfet DL; Lorich DG
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2015 Apr; 135(4):473-80. PubMed ID: 25708026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Nailing precision: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing piriformis and trochanteric entry points for femoral antegrade nailing.
Acevedo D; Suarez A; Checkley T; Fakhoury I; Reyes M; Constantinescu D; Hernandez GM
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2024 Jun; 144(6):2527-2538. PubMed ID: 38744693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Functional outcome following intramedullary nailing of the femur: a prospective randomized comparison of piriformis fossa and greater trochanteric entry portals.
Stannard JP; Bankston L; Futch LA; McGwin G; Volgas DA
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 Aug; 93(15):1385-91. PubMed ID: 21915543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Trochanteric fossa or piriform fossa of the femur: time for standardised terminology?
Ansari Moein CM; Gerrits PD; ten Duis HJ
Injury; 2013 Jun; 44(6):722-5. PubMed ID: 23026115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Estimating the optimal entry point of the antegrade femoral nailing: Previous and novel morphometric measurements.
Erçakmak Güneş B; Ilgaz HB; Çiledağ N; Özsoy H; Hayran M; Demiryürek D
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc; 2022 Mar; 56(2):81-87. PubMed ID: 35416157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Correct anatomical location of entry point for antegrade femoral nailing.
Kale SP; Patil N; Pilankar S; Karkhanis AR; Bagaria V
Injury; 2006 Oct; 37(10):990-3. PubMed ID: 16934257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Greater trochanteric versus piriformis fossa entry nails for femur shaft fractures: Resolving the controversy.
Kumar P; Neradi D; Kansal R; Aggarwal S; Kumar V; Dhillon MS
Injury; 2019 Oct; 50(10):1715-1724. PubMed ID: 31358301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
