These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17260371)
1. Comparison of a reference region model with direct measurement of an AIF in the analysis of DCE-MRI data. Yankeelov TE; Cron GO; Addison CL; Wallace JC; Wilkins RC; Pappas BA; Santyr GE; Gore JC Magn Reson Med; 2007 Feb; 57(2):353-61. PubMed ID: 17260371 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quantitative pharmacokinetic analysis of DCE-MRI data without an arterial input function: a reference region model. Yankeelov TE; Luci JJ; Lepage M; Li R; Debusk L; Lin PC; Price RR; Gore JC Magn Reson Imaging; 2005 May; 23(4):519-29. PubMed ID: 15919597 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of tumor histology to dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging-based physiological estimates. Aref M; Chaudhari AR; Bailey KL; Aref S; Wiener EC Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Nov; 26(9):1279-93. PubMed ID: 18487033 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reproducibility of the aortic input function (AIF) derived from dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) of the kidneys in a volunteer study. Mendichovszky IA; Cutajar M; Gordon I Eur J Radiol; 2009 Sep; 71(3):576-81. PubMed ID: 19004588 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Repeatability of a reference region model for analysis of murine DCE-MRI data at 7T. Yankeelov TE; DeBusk LM; Billheimer DD; Luci JJ; Lin PC; Price RR; Gore JC J Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 Nov; 24(5):1140-7. PubMed ID: 17024660 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quantifying dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of the knee in children with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis using an arterial input function (AIF) extracted from popliteal artery enhancement, and the effect of the choice of the AIF on the kinetic parameters. Workie DW; Dardzinski BJ Magn Reson Med; 2005 Sep; 54(3):560-8. PubMed ID: 16088875 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comprehensive population-averaged arterial input function for dynamic contrast-enhanced vmagnetic resonance imaging of head and neck cancer. Onxley JD; Yoo DS; Muradyan N; MacFall JR; Brizel DM; Craciunescu OI Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2014 Jul; 89(3):658-65. PubMed ID: 24929169 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Investigation and optimization of parameter accuracy in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. Cheng HL J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Sep; 28(3):736-43. PubMed ID: 18777534 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessment of tumor radioresponsiveness and metastatic potential by dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Øvrebø KM; Gulliksrud K; Mathiesen B; Rofstad EK Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2011 Sep; 81(1):255-61. PubMed ID: 21816291 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Conversion of arterial input functions for dual pharmacokinetic modeling using Gd-DTPA/MRI and 18F-FDG/PET. Poulin E; Lebel R; Croteau E; Blanchette M; Tremblay L; Lecomte R; Bentourkia M; Lepage M Magn Reson Med; 2013 Mar; 69(3):781-92. PubMed ID: 22570280 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative study of methods for determining vascular permeability and blood volume in human gliomas. Harrer JU; Parker GJ; Haroon HA; Buckley DL; Embelton K; Roberts C; Balériaux D; Jackson A J Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Nov; 20(5):748-57. PubMed ID: 15503330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of T2* correction on contrast kinetic model analysis using a reference tissue arterial input function at 7 T. Zhang J; Freed M; Winters K; Kim SG MAGMA; 2015 Dec; 28(6):555-63. PubMed ID: 26239630 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of model-based arterial input functions for dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in tumor bearing rats. McGrath DM; Bradley DP; Tessier JL; Lacey T; Taylor CJ; Parker GJ Magn Reson Med; 2009 May; 61(5):1173-84. PubMed ID: 19253360 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessment of tumor treatment response using active contrast encoding (ACE)-MRI: Comparison with conventional DCE-MRI. Zhang J; Winters K; Kiser K; Baboli M; Kim SG PLoS One; 2020; 15(6):e0234520. PubMed ID: 32520950 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An analysis of the pharmacokinetic parameter ratios in DCE-MRI using the reference region model. Lee J; Platt S; Kent M; Zhao Q Magn Reson Imaging; 2012 Jan; 30(1):26-35. PubMed ID: 22071409 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of analytical and numerical analysis of the reference region model for DCE-MRI. Lee J; Cárdenas-Rodríguez J; Pagel MD; Platt S; Kent M; Zhao Q Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Sep; 32(7):845-53. PubMed ID: 24925838 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Subcompartmentalization of extracellular extravascular space (EES) into permeability and leaky space with local arterial input function (AIF) results in improved discrimination between high- and low-grade glioma using dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI. Sahoo P; Rathore RK; Awasthi R; Roy B; Verma S; Rathore D; Behari S; Husain M; Husain N; Pandey CM; Mohakud S; Gupta RK J Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 Sep; 38(3):677-88. PubMed ID: 23390002 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. GPU-accelerated nonparametric kinetic analysis of DCE-MRI data from glioblastoma patients treated with bevacizumab. Hsu YH; Ferl GZ; Ng CM Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 May; 31(4):618-23. PubMed ID: 23200680 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A clinically feasible method to estimate pharmacokinetic parameters in breast cancer. Li J; Yu Y; Zhang Y; Bao S; Wu C; Wang X; Li J; Zhang X; Hu J Med Phys; 2009 Aug; 36(8):3786-94. PubMed ID: 19746812 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) derived transfer coefficient (ktrans) is a surrogate marker of matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP-9) expression in brain tuberculomas. Haris M; Husain N; Singh A; Awasthi R; Singh Rathore RK; Husain M; Gupta RK J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Sep; 28(3):588-97. PubMed ID: 18777539 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]