BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17260583)

  • 1. Miniature LiF:Mg,Cu,P TLDs to study the effect of applicator material in 192-Ir brachytherapy.
    Hood C; Duggan L; Bazley S; Denham J; Kron T
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2006 Dec; 29(4):300-2. PubMed ID: 17260583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. LiF:Mg,Cu,P 'pin worms': miniature detectors for brachytherapy dosimetry.
    Hood C; Duggan L; Bazley S; Denham J; Budzanowski M; Kron T
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2002; 101(1-4):407-10. PubMed ID: 12382778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Using LiF:Mg,Cu,P TLDs to estimate the absorbed dose to water in liquid water around an 192Ir brachytherapy source.
    Lucas PA; Aubineau-Lanièce I; Lourenço V; Vermesse D; Cutarella D
    Med Phys; 2014 Jan; 41(1):011711. PubMed ID: 24387503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Angular and radial dependence of the energy response factor for LIF-TLD micro-rods in 125L permanent implant source.
    Mobit P; Badragan I
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 120(1-4):70-3. PubMed ID: 16782977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of the effects of exposure to light in Harshaw LiF:Mg,Ti and LiF:Mg,Cu,P.
    Baker ST; Gilvin PJ
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 125(1-4):258-60. PubMed ID: 16980318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Energy response of LiF and Mg2SiO4 TLDs to 10-150 keV monoenergetic photons.
    Konnai A; Nariyama N; Ohnishi S; Odano N
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 115(1-4):334-6. PubMed ID: 16381741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Doses to LiF :Ti, Mg chips encapsulated in plastic extremity rings as a result of radon gas exposure.
    Kearfott KJ; Noon EP; Rafique M
    J Radiol Prot; 2015 Jun; 35(2):265-70. PubMed ID: 25785500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Variations in dose response with x-ray energy of LiF:Mg,Cu,P thermoluminescence dosimeters: implications for clinical dosimetry.
    Duggan L; Hood C; Warren-Forward H; Haque M; Kron T
    Phys Med Biol; 2004 Sep; 49(17):3831-45. PubMed ID: 15470908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of the variation of energy spectra with depth in the dosimetry of 192Ir using LiF TLD.
    Meigooni AS; Meli JA; Nath R
    Phys Med Biol; 1988 Oct; 33(10):1159-70. PubMed ID: 3194446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dosimetry of densely ionising radiation with three LiF phosphors for space applications.
    Bilski P
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 120(1-4):397-400. PubMed ID: 16731689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Correction factors kE and kQ for LiF-TLDs for dosimetry in megavoltage electron and photon beams.
    Bruggmoser G; Saum R; Saum F; Gainey M; Pychlau C; Kapsch RP; Zink K
    Z Med Phys; 2015 Jun; 25(2):186-91. PubMed ID: 24973310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comments on 'The thermoluminescence dose-response and other characteristics of the high-temperature TL in LiF: Mg.Ti (TLD-100)' by Y.S. Horowitz, L. Oster and H. Datz.
    German U; Weinstein M; Abraham A; Alfassi ZB
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 128(4):509-10; author reply 510-5. PubMed ID: 18420571
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Low temperature radioluminescence of LiF:Mg,Cu,P.
    Kurt K; Mathur VK; McKeever SW; Townsend PD; Valberg L
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 119(1-4):134-8. PubMed ID: 16735562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparative study on the susceptibility of LiF:Mg,Ti (TLD-100) and LiF:Mg,Cu,P (TLD-100H) to spurious signals in thermoluminescence dosimetry.
    Al-Haj A; Lagarde C; Mahyoub F
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 125(1-4):399-402. PubMed ID: 17223633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Further studies on the role of dopants in LiF:Mg,Cu,Si thermoluminescent material.
    Tang K; Fan H; Cui H; Zhu H; Liu Z
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Feb; 163(3):288-91. PubMed ID: 24966341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Attenuation of intracavitary applicators in 192Ir-HDR brachytherapy.
    Ye SJ; Brezovich IA; Shen S; Duan J; Popple RA; Pareek PN
    Med Phys; 2004 Jul; 31(7):2097-106. PubMed ID: 15305463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The application of LiF:Mg,Cu,P to large scale personnel dosimetry: current status and future directions.
    Moscovitch M; St John TJ; Cassata JR; Blake PK; Rotunda JE; Ramlo M; Velbeck KJ; Luo LZ
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 119(1-4):248-54. PubMed ID: 16835277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Determination of absorbed dose to water around a clinical HDR (192)Ir source using LiF:Mg,Ti TLDs demonstrates an LET dependence of detector response.
    Carlsson Tedgren A; Elia R; Hedtjarn H; Olsson S; Alm Carlsson G
    Med Phys; 2012 Feb; 39(2):1133-40. PubMed ID: 22320824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. On the roles of the dopants in LiF: Mg,Cu,Na,Si thermoluminescent material.
    Lee JI; Kim JL; Chang SY; Chung KS; Choe HS
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 115(1-4):340-4. PubMed ID: 16381743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [In vivo dosimetry in interstitial "low dose rate" afterloading therapy with Ir-192 seeds exemplified with head-neck tumors].
    Sadat Khonsari A; Grabenbauer G; Müller RG; Säbel M
    Strahlenther Onkol; 1991 Jul; 167(7):407-11. PubMed ID: 1858017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.