226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17262800)
1. Prognostic ability of simplified nuclear grading of renal cell carcinoma.
Rioux-Leclercq N; Karakiewicz PI; Trinh QD; Ficarra V; Cindolo L; de la Taille A; Tostain J; Zigeuner R; Mejean A; Patard JJ
Cancer; 2007 Mar; 109(5):868-74. PubMed ID: 17262800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Original and reviewed nuclear grading according to the Fuhrman system: a multivariate analysis of 388 patients with conventional renal cell carcinoma.
Ficarra V; Martignoni G; Maffei N; Brunelli M; Novara G; Zanolla L; Pea M; Artibani W
Cancer; 2005 Jan; 103(1):68-75. PubMed ID: 15573369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Multicenter determination of optimal interobserver agreement using the Fuhrman grading system for renal cell carcinoma: Assessment of 241 patients with > 15-year follow-up.
Lang H; Lindner V; de Fromont M; Molinié V; Letourneux H; Meyer N; Martin M; Jacqmin D
Cancer; 2005 Feb; 103(3):625-9. PubMed ID: 15611969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A novel tumor grading scheme for chromophobe renal cell carcinoma: prognostic utility and comparison with Fuhrman nuclear grade.
Paner GP; Amin MB; Alvarado-Cabrero I; Young AN; Stricker HJ; Moch H; Lyles RH
Am J Surg Pathol; 2010 Sep; 34(9):1233-40. PubMed ID: 20679882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Renal cell carcinoma with nodal metastases in the absence of distant metastatic disease: prognostic indicators of disease-specific survival.
Karakiewicz PI; Trinh QD; Bhojani N; Bensalah K; Salomon L; de la Taille A; Tostain J; Cindolo L; Altieri V; Ficarra V; Schips L; Zigeuner R; Mulders PF; Valeri A; Descotes JL; Mejean A; Patard JJ
Eur Urol; 2007 Jun; 51(6):1616-24. PubMed ID: 17207909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Percentage of high-grade carcinoma as a prognostic indicator in patients with renal cell carcinoma.
Serrano MF; Katz M; Yan Y; Kibel AS; Humphrey PA
Cancer; 2008 Aug; 113(3):477-83. PubMed ID: 18484589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. C-reactive protein is an informative predictor of renal cell carcinoma-specific mortality: a European study of 313 patients.
Karakiewicz PI; Hutterer GC; Trinh QD; Jeldres C; Perrotte P; Gallina A; Tostain J; Patard JJ
Cancer; 2007 Sep; 110(6):1241-7. PubMed ID: 17639589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Fuhrman grading is not appropriate for chromophobe renal cell carcinoma.
Delahunt B; Sika-Paotonu D; Bethwaite PB; McCredie MR; Martignoni G; Eble JN; Jordan TW
Am J Surg Pathol; 2007 Jun; 31(6):957-60. PubMed ID: 17527087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The chromophobe tumor grading system is the preferred grading scheme for chromophobe renal cell carcinoma.
Finley DS; Shuch B; Said JW; Galliano G; Jeffries RA; Afifi AA; Castor B; Magyar C; Sadaat A; Kabbinavar FF; Belldegrun AS; Pantuck AJ
J Urol; 2011 Dec; 186(6):2168-74. PubMed ID: 22014797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Histological subtyping and nuclear grading of renal cell carcinoma and their implications for survival: a retrospective nation-wide study of 629 patients.
Gudbjartsson T; Hardarson S; Petursdottir V; Thoroddsen A; Magnusson J; Einarsson GV
Eur Urol; 2005 Oct; 48(4):593-600. PubMed ID: 15964127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prognostic significance of clinicopathologic and deoxyribonucleic acid flow cytometric variables in non-metastatic renal cell carcinoma in the modern era.
Clark PE; Veys JA; Eskridge MR; Woodruff RD; Hall MC
Urol Oncol; 2005; 23(5):328-32. PubMed ID: 16144666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Grading of clear cell renal cell carcinoma should be based on nucleolar prominence.
Delahunt B; Sika-Paotonu D; Bethwaite PB; William Jordan T; Magi-Galluzzi C; Zhou M; Samaratunga H; Srigley JR
Am J Surg Pathol; 2011 Aug; 35(8):1134-9. PubMed ID: 21716085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Collecting system invasion and Fuhrman grade but not tumor size facilitate prognostic stratification of patients with pT2 renal cell carcinoma.
Brookman-May S; May M; Zigeuner R; Shariat SF; Scherr DS; Chromecki T; Moch H; Wild PJ; Mohamad-Al-Ali B; Cindolo L; Wieland WF; Schips L; De Cobelli O; Rocco B; Santoro L; De Nunzio C; Tubaro A; Coman I; Feciche B; Truss M; Dalpiaz O; Hohenfellner M; Gilfrich C; Wirth MP; Burger M; Pahernik S;
J Urol; 2011 Dec; 186(6):2175-81. PubMed ID: 22014800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A critical assessment of the prognostic value of clear cell, papillary and chromophobe histological subtypes in renal cell carcinoma: a population-based study.
Capitanio U; Cloutier V; Zini L; Isbarn H; Jeldres C; Shariat SF; Perrotte P; Antebi E; Patard JJ; Montorsi F; Karakiewicz PI
BJU Int; 2009 Jun; 103(11):1496-500. PubMed ID: 19076149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Platelet count and preoperative haemoglobin do not significantly increase the performance of established predictors of renal cell carcinoma-specific mortality.
Karakiewicz PI; Trinh QD; Lam JS; Tostain J; Pantuck AJ; Belldegrun AS; Patard JJ
Eur Urol; 2007 Nov; 52(5):1428-36. PubMed ID: 17420085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Significance of nuclear grade and tumor size in Korean patients with chromophobe renal cell carcinoma: a comparison with conventional renal cell carcinoma.
Ku JH; Moon KC; Kwak C; Kim HH
Urol Oncol; 2011; 29(5):487-91. PubMed ID: 19767221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Critical analysis of a simplified Fuhrman grading scheme for prediction of cancer specific mortality in patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma--Impact on prognosis.
Becker A; Hickmann D; Hansen J; Meyer C; Rink M; Schmid M; Eichelberg C; Strini K; Chromecki T; Jesche J; Regier M; Randazzo M; Tilki D; Ahyai S; Dahlem R; Fisch M; Zigeuner R; Chun FK
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2016 Mar; 42(3):419-25. PubMed ID: 26520403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prognostic value of renal vein and inferior vena cava involvement in renal cell carcinoma.
Wagner B; Patard JJ; Méjean A; Bensalah K; Verhoest G; Zigeuner R; Ficarra V; Tostain J; Mulders P; Chautard D; Descotes JL; de la Taille A; Salomon L; Prayer-Galetti T; Cindolo L; Valéri A; Meyer N; Jacqmin D; Lang H
Eur Urol; 2009 Feb; 55(2):452-9. PubMed ID: 18692951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Stage-specific effect of nodal metastases on survival in patients with non-metastatic renal cell carcinoma.
Capitanio U; Jeldres C; Patard JJ; Perrotte P; Zini L; de La Taille A; Ficarra V; Cindolo L; Bensalah K; Artibani W; Tostain J; Valeri A; Zigeuner R; Méjean A; Descotes JL; Lechevallier E; Mulders PF; Lang H; Jacqmin D; Karakiewicz PI
BJU Int; 2009 Jan; 103(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 18990161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. ECOG performance status 0 or 1 and symptom classification do not improve the ability to predict renal cell carcinoma-specific survival.
Karakiewicz PI; Trinh QD; de la Taille A; Abbou CC; Salomon L; Tostain J; Cindolo L; Artibani W; Ficarra V; Patard JJ
Eur J Cancer; 2007 Apr; 43(6):1023-9. PubMed ID: 17349784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]