These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17262800)

  • 1. Prognostic ability of simplified nuclear grading of renal cell carcinoma.
    Rioux-Leclercq N; Karakiewicz PI; Trinh QD; Ficarra V; Cindolo L; de la Taille A; Tostain J; Zigeuner R; Mejean A; Patard JJ
    Cancer; 2007 Mar; 109(5):868-74. PubMed ID: 17262800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Original and reviewed nuclear grading according to the Fuhrman system: a multivariate analysis of 388 patients with conventional renal cell carcinoma.
    Ficarra V; Martignoni G; Maffei N; Brunelli M; Novara G; Zanolla L; Pea M; Artibani W
    Cancer; 2005 Jan; 103(1):68-75. PubMed ID: 15573369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Multicenter determination of optimal interobserver agreement using the Fuhrman grading system for renal cell carcinoma: Assessment of 241 patients with > 15-year follow-up.
    Lang H; Lindner V; de Fromont M; Molinié V; Letourneux H; Meyer N; Martin M; Jacqmin D
    Cancer; 2005 Feb; 103(3):625-9. PubMed ID: 15611969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A novel tumor grading scheme for chromophobe renal cell carcinoma: prognostic utility and comparison with Fuhrman nuclear grade.
    Paner GP; Amin MB; Alvarado-Cabrero I; Young AN; Stricker HJ; Moch H; Lyles RH
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2010 Sep; 34(9):1233-40. PubMed ID: 20679882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Renal cell carcinoma with nodal metastases in the absence of distant metastatic disease: prognostic indicators of disease-specific survival.
    Karakiewicz PI; Trinh QD; Bhojani N; Bensalah K; Salomon L; de la Taille A; Tostain J; Cindolo L; Altieri V; Ficarra V; Schips L; Zigeuner R; Mulders PF; Valeri A; Descotes JL; Mejean A; Patard JJ
    Eur Urol; 2007 Jun; 51(6):1616-24. PubMed ID: 17207909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Percentage of high-grade carcinoma as a prognostic indicator in patients with renal cell carcinoma.
    Serrano MF; Katz M; Yan Y; Kibel AS; Humphrey PA
    Cancer; 2008 Aug; 113(3):477-83. PubMed ID: 18484589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. C-reactive protein is an informative predictor of renal cell carcinoma-specific mortality: a European study of 313 patients.
    Karakiewicz PI; Hutterer GC; Trinh QD; Jeldres C; Perrotte P; Gallina A; Tostain J; Patard JJ
    Cancer; 2007 Sep; 110(6):1241-7. PubMed ID: 17639589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fuhrman grading is not appropriate for chromophobe renal cell carcinoma.
    Delahunt B; Sika-Paotonu D; Bethwaite PB; McCredie MR; Martignoni G; Eble JN; Jordan TW
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2007 Jun; 31(6):957-60. PubMed ID: 17527087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The chromophobe tumor grading system is the preferred grading scheme for chromophobe renal cell carcinoma.
    Finley DS; Shuch B; Said JW; Galliano G; Jeffries RA; Afifi AA; Castor B; Magyar C; Sadaat A; Kabbinavar FF; Belldegrun AS; Pantuck AJ
    J Urol; 2011 Dec; 186(6):2168-74. PubMed ID: 22014797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Histological subtyping and nuclear grading of renal cell carcinoma and their implications for survival: a retrospective nation-wide study of 629 patients.
    Gudbjartsson T; Hardarson S; Petursdottir V; Thoroddsen A; Magnusson J; Einarsson GV
    Eur Urol; 2005 Oct; 48(4):593-600. PubMed ID: 15964127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prognostic significance of clinicopathologic and deoxyribonucleic acid flow cytometric variables in non-metastatic renal cell carcinoma in the modern era.
    Clark PE; Veys JA; Eskridge MR; Woodruff RD; Hall MC
    Urol Oncol; 2005; 23(5):328-32. PubMed ID: 16144666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Grading of clear cell renal cell carcinoma should be based on nucleolar prominence.
    Delahunt B; Sika-Paotonu D; Bethwaite PB; William Jordan T; Magi-Galluzzi C; Zhou M; Samaratunga H; Srigley JR
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2011 Aug; 35(8):1134-9. PubMed ID: 21716085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Collecting system invasion and Fuhrman grade but not tumor size facilitate prognostic stratification of patients with pT2 renal cell carcinoma.
    Brookman-May S; May M; Zigeuner R; Shariat SF; Scherr DS; Chromecki T; Moch H; Wild PJ; Mohamad-Al-Ali B; Cindolo L; Wieland WF; Schips L; De Cobelli O; Rocco B; Santoro L; De Nunzio C; Tubaro A; Coman I; Feciche B; Truss M; Dalpiaz O; Hohenfellner M; Gilfrich C; Wirth MP; Burger M; Pahernik S;
    J Urol; 2011 Dec; 186(6):2175-81. PubMed ID: 22014800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A critical assessment of the prognostic value of clear cell, papillary and chromophobe histological subtypes in renal cell carcinoma: a population-based study.
    Capitanio U; Cloutier V; Zini L; Isbarn H; Jeldres C; Shariat SF; Perrotte P; Antebi E; Patard JJ; Montorsi F; Karakiewicz PI
    BJU Int; 2009 Jun; 103(11):1496-500. PubMed ID: 19076149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Platelet count and preoperative haemoglobin do not significantly increase the performance of established predictors of renal cell carcinoma-specific mortality.
    Karakiewicz PI; Trinh QD; Lam JS; Tostain J; Pantuck AJ; Belldegrun AS; Patard JJ
    Eur Urol; 2007 Nov; 52(5):1428-36. PubMed ID: 17420085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Significance of nuclear grade and tumor size in Korean patients with chromophobe renal cell carcinoma: a comparison with conventional renal cell carcinoma.
    Ku JH; Moon KC; Kwak C; Kim HH
    Urol Oncol; 2011; 29(5):487-91. PubMed ID: 19767221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Critical analysis of a simplified Fuhrman grading scheme for prediction of cancer specific mortality in patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma--Impact on prognosis.
    Becker A; Hickmann D; Hansen J; Meyer C; Rink M; Schmid M; Eichelberg C; Strini K; Chromecki T; Jesche J; Regier M; Randazzo M; Tilki D; Ahyai S; Dahlem R; Fisch M; Zigeuner R; Chun FK
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2016 Mar; 42(3):419-25. PubMed ID: 26520403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prognostic value of renal vein and inferior vena cava involvement in renal cell carcinoma.
    Wagner B; Patard JJ; Méjean A; Bensalah K; Verhoest G; Zigeuner R; Ficarra V; Tostain J; Mulders P; Chautard D; Descotes JL; de la Taille A; Salomon L; Prayer-Galetti T; Cindolo L; Valéri A; Meyer N; Jacqmin D; Lang H
    Eur Urol; 2009 Feb; 55(2):452-9. PubMed ID: 18692951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Stage-specific effect of nodal metastases on survival in patients with non-metastatic renal cell carcinoma.
    Capitanio U; Jeldres C; Patard JJ; Perrotte P; Zini L; de La Taille A; Ficarra V; Cindolo L; Bensalah K; Artibani W; Tostain J; Valeri A; Zigeuner R; Méjean A; Descotes JL; Lechevallier E; Mulders PF; Lang H; Jacqmin D; Karakiewicz PI
    BJU Int; 2009 Jan; 103(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 18990161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. ECOG performance status 0 or 1 and symptom classification do not improve the ability to predict renal cell carcinoma-specific survival.
    Karakiewicz PI; Trinh QD; de la Taille A; Abbou CC; Salomon L; Tostain J; Cindolo L; Artibani W; Ficarra V; Patard JJ
    Eur J Cancer; 2007 Apr; 43(6):1023-9. PubMed ID: 17349784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.