These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17264048)

  • 21. Response to 'Multicenter evaluation of a bilayer polymer blood coagulation tube for coagulation testing: effect on routine hemostasis test results and on plasma levels of coagulation activation markers'.
    Polack B
    Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis; 2007 Oct; 18(7):709. PubMed ID: 17890964
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Pseudohyperkalemia due to pneumatic tube transport in a leukemic patient.
    Kellerman PS; Thornbery JM
    Am J Kidney Dis; 2005 Oct; 46(4):746-8. PubMed ID: 16183430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Transport of blood gas samples: is the pneumatic tube system safe?].
    Zanner R; Moser N; Blobner M; Luppa PB
    Anaesthesist; 2006 Oct; 55(10):1099-104. PubMed ID: 16850326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Pneumatic tube transport of blood-stained cerebrospinal fluid specimens has no clinically relevant effect on rates of haemolysis compared to manual transport.
    Jones L; Isbister G; Chesher D; Gillett M
    Ann Clin Biochem; 2016 Jan; 53(Pt 1):168-73. PubMed ID: 26071489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Smartphones Can Monitor Medical Center Pneumatic Tube Systems.
    Mullins GR; Harrison JH; Bruns DE
    Clin Chem; 2016 Jun; 62(6):891-3. PubMed ID: 27103573
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Hemolysis of blood specimens transported from ED to laboratory by pneumatic tube.
    Stair TO; Howell JM; Fitzgerald DJ; Bailey SC; Bastasch MD
    Am J Emerg Med; 1995 Jul; 13(4):484. PubMed ID: 7605542
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Evaluation of serum separator tubes as a mail transport device in primary health care.
    Sandberg S; Christensen NG; Horgen E; Jacobsen H; Johansen K
    Scand J Prim Health Care; 1988 Nov; 6(4):251-4. PubMed ID: 3231943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Blood specimen collection should be performed by qualifies personnel].
    Viddal BV
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2008 Nov; 128(21):2472. PubMed ID: 19096473
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Parameters for Validating a Hospital Pneumatic Tube System.
    Farnsworth CW; Webber DM; Krekeler JA; Budelier MM; Bartlett NL; Gronowski AM
    Clin Chem; 2019 May; 65(5):694-702. PubMed ID: 30808643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A computer directed pneumatic tube system: its effects on specimens.
    Pragay DA; Fan P; Brinkley S; Chilcote ME
    Clin Biochem; 1980 Dec; 13(6):259-61. PubMed ID: 7214692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Strict adherence to a blood bank specimen labeling policy by all clinical laboratories significantly reduces the incidence of "wrong blood in tube".
    O'Neill E; Richardson-Weber L; McCormack G; Uhl L; Haspel RL
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2009 Aug; 132(2):164-8; quiz 306. PubMed ID: 19605809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Immunologic studies of blood samples transported by a pneumatic tube system.
    Greendyke RM; Banzhaf JC; Pelysko S; Bauman B
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1977 Oct; 68(4):508-10. PubMed ID: 906982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Evaluation of a soft-handling computerized pneumatic tube specimen delivery system. Effects on analytical results and turnaround time.
    Keshgegian AA; Bull GE
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1992 Apr; 97(4):535-40. PubMed ID: 1553919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Prevalence and type of pre-analytical problems for inpatients samples in coagulation laboratory.
    Salvagno GL; Lippi G; Bassi A; Poli G; Guidi GC
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2008 Apr; 14(2):351-3. PubMed ID: 18324942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparision between bed side testing of blood glucose by glucometer vs centralized testing in a tertiary care hospital.
    Baig A; Siddiqui I; Jabbar A; Azam SI; Sabir S; Alam S; Ghani F
    J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad; 2007; 19(3):25-9. PubMed ID: 18444586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Transition and the current status of sampling equipment].
    Ito K; Ikeda T
    Rinsho Byori; 1996 Nov; Suppl 103():279-81. PubMed ID: 9190419
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [From sample collection to testing. B. Evaluation of sample condensation in a container without a cover].
    Ikeda H; Tadano J; Saika K; Okumiya T; Sasaki M
    Rinsho Byori; 1996 Nov; Suppl 103():21-6. PubMed ID: 9190409
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Aerosol sampling system for collection of Capstone depleted uranium particles in a high-energy environment.
    Holmes TD; Guilmette RA; Cheng YS; Parkhurst MA; Hoover MD
    Health Phys; 2009 Mar; 96(3):221-37. PubMed ID: 19204482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Decentralization skews traditional specimen collection.
    Harty-Golder B
    MLO Med Lab Obs; 2005 Aug; 37(8):33. PubMed ID: 16194013
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Highly sensitive troponin T measurement after pneumatic tube transportation: The sample type can make the difference.
    Pasqualetti S; Panteghini M
    Clin Chim Acta; 2020 Apr; 503():231-232. PubMed ID: 31678578
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.