468 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17264365)
1. Computer-aided detection system for clustered microcalcifications: comparison of performance on full-field digital mammograms and digitized screen-film mammograms.
Ge J; Hadjiiski LM; Sahiner B; Wei J; Helvie MA; Zhou C; Chan HP
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Feb; 52(4):981-1000. PubMed ID: 17264365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Computer aided detection of clusters of microcalcifications on full field digital mammograms.
Ge J; Sahiner B; Hadjiiski LM; Chan HP; Wei J; Helvie MA; Zhou C
Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):2975-88. PubMed ID: 16964876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dual system approach to computer-aided detection of breast masses on mammograms.
Wei J; Chan HP; Sahiner B; Hadjiiski LM; Helvie MA; Roubidoux MA; Zhou C; Ge J
Med Phys; 2006 Nov; 33(11):4157-68. PubMed ID: 17153394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Computer-aided detection systems for breast masses: comparison of performances on full-field digital mammograms and digitized screen-film mammograms.
Wei J; Hadjiiski LM; Sahiner B; Chan HP; Ge J; Roubidoux MA; Helvie MA; Zhou C; Wu YT; Paramagul C; Zhang Y
Acad Radiol; 2007 Jun; 14(6):659-69. PubMed ID: 17502255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of computer-aided detection on independent double reading of paired screen-film and full-field digital screening mammograms.
Skaane P; Kshirsagar A; Stapleton S; Young K; Castellino RA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Feb; 188(2):377-84. PubMed ID: 17242245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A method to test the reproducibility and to improve performance of computer-aided detection schemes for digitized mammograms.
Zheng B; Gur D; Good WF; Hardesty LA
Med Phys; 2004 Nov; 31(11):2964-72. PubMed ID: 15587648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Computer-aided detection of masses in full-field digital mammography using screen-film mammograms for training.
Kallenberg M; Karssemeijer N
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Dec; 53(23):6879-91. PubMed ID: 19001703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Computer-aided detection of breast masses on full field digital mammograms.
Wei J; Sahiner B; Hadjiiski LM; Chan HP; Petrick N; Helvie MA; Roubidoux MA; Ge J; Zhou C
Med Phys; 2005 Sep; 32(9):2827-38. PubMed ID: 16266097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison study of image features between FFDM and film mammogram images.
Jing H; Yang Y; Wernick MN; Yarusso LM; Nishikawa RM
Med Phys; 2012 Jul; 39(7):4386-94. PubMed ID: 22830771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Performance of computer-aided detection applied to full-field digital mammography in detection of breast cancers.
Sadaf A; Crystal P; Scaranelo A; Helbich T
Eur J Radiol; 2011 Mar; 77(3):457-61. PubMed ID: 19875260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Computer-aided detection of clustered microcalcifications in digital breast tomosynthesis: a 3D approach.
Sahiner B; Chan HP; Hadjiiski LM; Helvie MA; Wei J; Zhou C; Lu Y
Med Phys; 2012 Jan; 39(1):28-39. PubMed ID: 22225272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Investigation of optimal use of computer-aided detection systems: the role of the "machine" in decision making process.
Paquerault S; Hardy PT; Wersto N; Chen J; Smith RC
Acad Radiol; 2010 Sep; 17(9):1112-21. PubMed ID: 20605489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The performance of computer-aided detection when analyzing prior mammograms of newly detected breast cancers with special focus on the time interval from initial imaging to detection.
Malich A; Schmidt S; Fischer DR; Facius M; Kaiser WA
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Mar; 69(3):574-8. PubMed ID: 18337045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Computer-aided detection of mammographic microcalcifications: pattern recognition with an artificial neural network.
Chan HP; Lo SC; Sahiner B; Lam KL; Helvie MA
Med Phys; 1995 Oct; 22(10):1555-67. PubMed ID: 8551980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Computer-aided detection in full-field digital mammography: sensitivity and reproducibility in serial examinations.
Kim SJ; Moon WK; Cho N; Cha JH; Kim SM; Im JG
Radiology; 2008 Jan; 246(1):71-80. PubMed ID: 18096530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Investigation of reading mode and relative sensitivity as factors that influence reader performance when using computer-aided detection software.
Paquerault S; Samuelson FW; Petrick N; Myers KJ; Smith RC
Acad Radiol; 2009 Sep; 16(9):1095-107. PubMed ID: 19523855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mass detection in reconstructed digital breast tomosynthesis volumes with a computer-aided detection system trained on 2D mammograms.
van Schie G; Wallis MG; Leifland K; Danielsson M; Karssemeijer N
Med Phys; 2013 Apr; 40(4):041902. PubMed ID: 23556896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. GPCALMA: implementation in Italian hospitals of a computer aided detection system for breast lesions by mammography examination.
Lauria A
Phys Med; 2009 Jun; 25(2):58-72. PubMed ID: 18602854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Computer-aided detection of breast masses on mammograms: dual system approach with two-view analysis.
Wei J; Chan HP; Sahiner B; Zhou C; Hadjiiski LM; Roubidoux MA; Helvie MA
Med Phys; 2009 Oct; 36(10):4451-60. PubMed ID: 19928076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Improving performance of computer-aided detection of masses by incorporating bilateral mammographic density asymmetry: an assessment.
Wang X; Li L; Xu W; Liu W; Lederman D; Zheng B
Acad Radiol; 2012 Mar; 19(3):303-10. PubMed ID: 22173323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
