617 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17264375)
1. Evaluation of surface and superficial dose for head and neck treatments using conventional or intensity-modulated techniques.
Higgins PD; Han EY; Yuan JL; Hui S; Lee CK
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Feb; 52(4):1135-46. PubMed ID: 17264375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Treatment plan comparison between helical tomotherapy and MLC-based IMRT using radiobiological measures.
Mavroidis P; Ferreira BC; Shi C; Lind BK; Papanikolaou N
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(13):3817-36. PubMed ID: 17664579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) dosimetry of the head and neck: a comparison of treatment plans using linear accelerator-based IMRT and helical tomotherapy.
Sheng K; Molloy JA; Read PW
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 Jul; 65(3):917-23. PubMed ID: 16751074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Lens dose in MLC-based IMRT treatments of the head and neck.
Pawlicki T; Luxton G; Le QT; Findley D; Ma CM
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 May; 59(1):293-9. PubMed ID: 15093926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Significant improvement in normal tissue sparing and target coverage for head and neck cancer by means of helical tomotherapy.
Fiorino C; Dell'Oca I; Pierelli A; Broggi S; De Martin E; Di Muzio N; Longobardi B; Fazio F; Calandrino R
Radiother Oncol; 2006 Mar; 78(3):276-82. PubMed ID: 16546279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Helical tomotherapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: dosimetric comparison with linear accelerator-based step-and-shoot IMRT.
Murthy V; Master Z; Gupta T; Ghosh-Laskar S; Budrukkar A; Phurailatpam R; Agarwal J
J Cancer Res Ther; 2010; 6(2):194-8. PubMed ID: 20622367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Experimental evaluation of the impact of different head-and-neck intensity-modulated radiation therapy planning techniques on doses to the skin and shallow targets.
Court LE; Tishler RB
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2007 Oct; 69(2):607-13. PubMed ID: 17869674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dosimetric comparison of helical tomotherapy and linac-IMRT treatment plans for head and neck cancer patients.
Zhang X; Penagaricano J; Moros EG; Corry PM; Yan Y; Ratanatharathorn V
Med Dosim; 2010; 35(4):264-8. PubMed ID: 19944587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Helical tomotherapy-based STAT RT: Dosimetric evaluation for clinical implementation of a rapid radiation palliation program.
McIntosh A; Dunlap N; Sheng K; Geezey C; Turner B; Blackhall L; Weiss G; Lappinen E; Larner JM; Read PW
Med Dosim; 2010; 35(4):280-6. PubMed ID: 19944589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dosimetric comparison between 2-dimensional radiation therapy and intensity modulated radiation therapy in treatment of advanced T-stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma: to treat less or more in the planning organ-at-risk volume of the brainstem and spinal cord.
Chau RM; Teo PM; Kam MK; Leung SF; Cheung KY; Chan AT
Med Dosim; 2007; 32(4):263-70. PubMed ID: 17980826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Helical tomotherapy superficial dose measurements.
Ramsey CR; Seibert RM; Robison B; Mitchell M
Med Phys; 2007 Aug; 34(8):3286-93. PubMed ID: 17879792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Multileaf field-in-field forward-planned intensity-modulated dose compensation for whole-breast irradiation is associated with reduced contralateral breast dose: a phantom model comparison.
Borghero YO; Salehpour M; McNeese MD; Stovall M; Smith SA; Johnson J; Perkins GH; Strom EA; Oh JL; Kirsner SM; Woodward WA; Yu TK; Buchholz TA
Radiother Oncol; 2007 Mar; 82(3):324-8. PubMed ID: 17157944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy dose prescription, recording, and delivery: patterns of variability among institutions and treatment planning systems.
Das IJ; Cheng CW; Chopra KL; Mitra RK; Srivastava SP; Glatstein E
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 Mar; 100(5):300-7. PubMed ID: 18314476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A motion phantom study on helical tomotherapy: the dosimetric impacts of delivery technique and motion.
Kanagaki B; Read PW; Molloy JA; Larner JM; Sheng K
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jan; 52(1):243-55. PubMed ID: 17183139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of IMRT treatment plans between linac and helical tomotherapy based on integral dose and inhomogeneity index.
Shi C; Peñagarícano J; Papanikolaou N
Med Dosim; 2008; 33(3):215-21. PubMed ID: 18674686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. MOSFET detectors in quality assurance of tomotherapy treatments.
Cherpak A; Studinski RC; Cygler JE
Radiother Oncol; 2008 Feb; 86(2):242-50. PubMed ID: 18037519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Superficial doses in breast cancer radiotherapy using conventional and IMRT techniques: a film-based phantom study.
Almberg SS; Lindmo T; Frengen J
Radiother Oncol; 2011 Aug; 100(2):259-64. PubMed ID: 21624698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Head-and-neck IMRT treatments assessed with a Monte Carlo dose calculation engine.
Seco J; Adams E; Bidmead M; Partridge M; Verhaegen F
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 50(5):817-30. PubMed ID: 15798257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Integral dose in three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy, intensity-modulated radiotherapy and helical tomotherapy.
Yang R; Xu S; Jiang W; Xie C; Wang J
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol); 2009 Nov; 21(9):706-12. PubMed ID: 19713087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Choosing an intensity-modulated radiation therapy technique in the treatment of head-and-neck cancer.
Lee N; Mechalakos J; Puri DR; Hunt M
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2007 Aug; 68(5):1299-309. PubMed ID: 17241750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
