These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

309 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17266019)

  • 1. The brain tissue response to implanted silicon microelectrode arrays is increased when the device is tethered to the skull.
    Biran R; Martin DC; Tresco PA
    J Biomed Mater Res A; 2007 Jul; 82(1):169-78. PubMed ID: 17266019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Neuronal cell loss accompanies the brain tissue response to chronically implanted silicon microelectrode arrays.
    Biran R; Martin DC; Tresco PA
    Exp Neurol; 2005 Sep; 195(1):115-26. PubMed ID: 16045910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Extraction force and cortical tissue reaction of silicon microelectrode arrays implanted in the rat brain.
    McConnell GC; Schneider TM; Owens DJ; Bellamkonda RV
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2007 Jun; 54(6 Pt 1):1097-107. PubMed ID: 17554828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Toward a comparison of microelectrodes for acute and chronic recordings.
    Ward MP; Rajdev P; Ellison C; Irazoqui PP
    Brain Res; 2009 Jul; 1282():183-200. PubMed ID: 19486899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reducing surface area while maintaining implant penetrating profile lowers the brain foreign body response to chronically implanted planar silicon microelectrode arrays.
    Skousen JL; Merriam SM; Srivannavit O; Perlin G; Wise KD; Tresco PA
    Prog Brain Res; 2011; 194():167-80. PubMed ID: 21867802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Nanoscale laminin coating modulates cortical scarring response around implanted silicon microelectrode arrays.
    He W; McConnell GC; Bellamkonda RV
    J Neural Eng; 2006 Dec; 3(4):316-26. PubMed ID: 17124336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cerebral astrocyte response to micromachined silicon implants.
    Turner JN; Shain W; Szarowski DH; Andersen M; Martins S; Isaacson M; Craighead H
    Exp Neurol; 1999 Mar; 156(1):33-49. PubMed ID: 10192775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Response of brain tissue to chronically implanted neural electrodes.
    Polikov VS; Tresco PA; Reichert WM
    J Neurosci Methods; 2005 Oct; 148(1):1-18. PubMed ID: 16198003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Chronic neural recording using silicon-substrate microelectrode arrays implanted in cerebral cortex.
    Vetter RJ; Williams JC; Hetke JF; Nunamaker EA; Kipke DR
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2004 Jun; 51(6):896-904. PubMed ID: 15188856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Biocompatibility of silicon-based electrode arrays implanted in feline cortical tissue.
    Schmidt S; Horch K; Normann R
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1993 Nov; 27(11):1393-9. PubMed ID: 8263001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bioactive properties of nanostructured porous silicon for enhancing electrode to neuron interfaces.
    Moxon KA; Hallman S; Aslani A; Kalkhoran NM; Lelkes PI
    J Biomater Sci Polym Ed; 2007; 18(10):1263-81. PubMed ID: 17939885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Nanostructured surface modification of ceramic-based microelectrodes to enhance biocompatibility for a direct brain-machine interface.
    Moxon KA; Kalkhoran NM; Markert M; Sambito MA; McKenzie JL; Webster JT
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2004 Jun; 51(6):881-9. PubMed ID: 15188854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. In vivo electrical impedance spectroscopy of tissue reaction to microelectrode arrays.
    Mercanzini A; Colin P; Bensadoun JC; Bertsch A; Renaud P
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2009 Jul; 56(7):1909-18. PubMed ID: 19362904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Thin microelectrodes reduce GFAP expression in the implant site in rodent somatosensory cortex.
    Stice P; Gilletti A; Panitch A; Muthuswamy J
    J Neural Eng; 2007 Jun; 4(2):42-53. PubMed ID: 17409479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Massively parallel recording of unit and local field potentials with silicon-based electrodes.
    Csicsvari J; Henze DA; Jamieson B; Harris KD; Sirota A; Barthó P; Wise KD; Buzsáki G
    J Neurophysiol; 2003 Aug; 90(2):1314-23. PubMed ID: 12904510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of the tissue response to chronically implanted Parylene-C-coated and uncoated planar silicon microelectrode arrays in rat cortex.
    Winslow BD; Christensen MB; Yang WK; Solzbacher F; Tresco PA
    Biomaterials; 2010 Dec; 31(35):9163-72. PubMed ID: 20561678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impedance characterization of microarray recording electrodes in vitro.
    Merrill DR; Tresco PA
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2005 Nov; 52(11):1960-5. PubMed ID: 16285400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An ex vivo method for evaluating the biocompatibility of neural electrodes in rat brain slice cultures.
    Koeneman BA; Lee KK; Singh A; He J; Raupp GB; Panitch A; Capco DG
    J Neurosci Methods; 2004 Aug; 137(2):257-63. PubMed ID: 15262069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Factors influencing the biocompatibility of insertable silicon microshafts in cerebral cortex.
    Edell DJ; Toi VV; McNeil VM; Clark LD
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1992 Jun; 39(6):635-43. PubMed ID: 1601445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Precise Tubular Braid Structures of Ultrafine Microwires as Neural Probes: Significantly Reduced Chronic Immune Response and Greater Local Neural Survival in Rat Cortex.
    Kim T; Zhong Y; Giszter SF
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2019 May; 27(5):846-856. PubMed ID: 30998475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.