These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1726647)

  • 1. Experimental hyaline cartilage lesions: two-dimensional spin-echo versus three-dimensional gradient-echo MR imaging.
    Adam G; Nolte-Ernsting C; Prescher A; Bühne M; Bruchmüller K; Küpper W; Günther RW
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 1991; 1(6):665-72. PubMed ID: 1726647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Detection of knee hyaline cartilage defects using fat-suppressed three-dimensional spoiled gradient-echo MR imaging: comparison with standard MR imaging and correlation with arthroscopy.
    Disler DG; McCauley TR; Wirth CR; Fuchs MD
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Aug; 165(2):377-82. PubMed ID: 7618561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [MRI of the hyaline knee joint cartilages. Animal and clinical studies].
    Adam G; Prescher A; Nolte-Ernsting C; Bühne M; Scherer K; Küpper W; Günther RW
    Rofo; 1994 Feb; 160(2):143-8. PubMed ID: 8312511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bilaminar pattern of tibial condyle cartilage layer on the fat-suppressed 3D gradient echo images: artifact or structural and biochemical difference in composition of cartilage?
    Trattnig S; Mlynárik V; Jung B; Bader T; Sulzbacher I; Herneth A; Gaisch R; Puig S
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2001 Feb; 19(2):187-92. PubMed ID: 11358656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Differentiation between grade 3 and grade 4 articular cartilage defects of the knee: fat-suppressed proton density-weighted versus fat-suppressed three-dimensional gradient-echo MRI.
    Lee SY; Jee WH; Kim SK; Koh IJ; Kim JM
    Acta Radiol; 2010 May; 51(4):455-61. PubMed ID: 20350249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Human articular cartilage: in vitro correlation of MRI and histologic findings.
    Uhl M; Ihling C; Allmann KH; Laubenberger J; Tauer U; Adler CP; Langer M
    Eur Radiol; 1998; 8(7):1123-9. PubMed ID: 9724423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Spin-echo and 3D gradient-echo imaging of the knee joint: a clinical and histopathological comparison.
    Gückel C; Jundt G; Schnabel K; Gächter A
    Eur J Radiol; 1995 Nov; 21(1):25-33. PubMed ID: 8654455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Magnetic resonance imaging of hyaline cartilage defects at 1.5T and 3.0T: comparison of medium T2-weighted fast spin echo, T1-weighted two-dimensional and three-dimensional gradient echo pulse sequences.
    Fischbach F; Bruhn H; Unterhauser F; Ricke J; Wieners G; Felix R; Weiler A; Schröder RJ
    Acta Radiol; 2005 Feb; 46(1):67-73. PubMed ID: 15841742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of 3D vs. 2D fast spin echo imaging for evaluation of articular cartilage in the knee on a 3T system scientific research.
    Milewski MD; Smitaman E; Moukaddam H; Katz LD; Essig DA; Medvecky MJ; Haims AH
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Jul; 81(7):1637-43. PubMed ID: 21683539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of the articular cartilage of the knee joint with vastly undersampled isotropic projection reconstruction steady-state free precession imaging.
    Kijowski R; Lu A; Block W; Grist T
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 Jul; 24(1):168-75. PubMed ID: 16758476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Detection of articular cartilage lesions: experimental evaluation of low- and high-field-strength MR imaging at 0.18 and 1.0 T.
    Woertler K; Strothmann M; Tombach B; Reimer P
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2000 Jun; 11(6):678-85. PubMed ID: 10862068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Isotropic 3-dimensional fast spin echo imaging versus standard 2-dimensional imaging at 3.0 T of the knee: artificial cartilage and meniscal lesions in a porcine model.
    Ristow O; Stehling C; Krug R; Steinbach L; Sabo G; Ambekar A; Huber M; Link TM
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2010; 34(2):260-9. PubMed ID: 20351518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accuracy of T2-weighted fast spin-echo MR imaging with fat saturation in detecting cartilage defects in the knee: comparison with arthroscopy in 130 patients.
    Bredella MA; Tirman PF; Peterfy CG; Zarlingo M; Feller JF; Bost FW; Belzer JP; Wischer TK; Genant HK
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Apr; 172(4):1073-80. PubMed ID: 10587150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of cartilage surface injuries using 3D-double echo steady state (3D-DESS): effect of changing flip angle from 40° to 90°.
    Moriya S; Miki Y; Kanagaki M; Yamamoto A; Okudaira S; Nakamura S; Yokobayashi T; Ishikawa M
    Acta Radiol; 2011 Dec; 52(10):1138-42. PubMed ID: 22042983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Three-dimensional magnetic resonance observation of cartilage repair tissue (MOCART) score assessed with an isotropic three-dimensional true fast imaging with steady-state precession sequence at 3.0 Tesla.
    Welsch GH; Zak L; Mamisch TC; Resinger C; Marlovits S; Trattnig S
    Invest Radiol; 2009 Sep; 44(9):603-12. PubMed ID: 19692843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fat-suppressed spoiled GRASS imaging of knee hyaline cartilage: technique optimization and comparison with conventional MR imaging.
    Disler DG; Peters TL; Muscoreil SJ; Ratner LM; Wagle WA; Cousins JP; Rifkin MD
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Oct; 163(4):887-92. PubMed ID: 8092029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. MRI findings in injured articular cartilage of the knee correlated with surgical findings.
    Li XM; Peng WJ; Wu H; Kacher D; Xia LM; Ai F; Li F; Xiong W
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2009 Nov; 122(21):2624-30. PubMed ID: 19951582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. MR arthrography of the hip: diagnostic performance of a dedicated water-excitation 3D double-echo steady-state sequence to detect cartilage lesions.
    Knuesel PR; Pfirrmann CW; Noetzli HP; Dora C; Zanetti M; Hodler J; Kuehn B; Schmid MR
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 Dec; 183(6):1729-35. PubMed ID: 15547220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Advanced morphological 3D magnetic resonance observation of cartilage repair tissue (MOCART) scoring using a new isotropic 3D proton-density, turbo spin echo sequence with variable flip angle distribution (PD-SPACE) compared to an isotropic 3D steady-state free precession sequence (True-FISP) and standard 2D sequences.
    Welsch GH; Zak L; Mamisch TC; Paul D; Lauer L; Mauerer A; Marlovits S; Trattnig S
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2011 Jan; 33(1):180-8. PubMed ID: 21182137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Articular cartilage of knee: normal patterns at MR imaging that mimic disease in healthy subjects and patients with osteoarthritis.
    Yoshioka H; Stevens K; Genovese M; Dillingham MF; Lang P
    Radiology; 2004 Apr; 231(1):31-8. PubMed ID: 15068938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.