These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1726647)

  • 21. [MRT of the knee joint cartilage using 3D volume imaging in combination with a fast image processor].
    Adam G; Bondorf K; Prescher A; Drobnitzky M; Günther RW
    Radiol Diagn (Berl); 1989; 30(5):605-13. PubMed ID: 2587726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Zonal T2* and T1Gd assessment of knee joint cartilage in various histological grades of cartilage degeneration: an observational in vitro study.
    Bittersohl B; Hosalkar HS; Miese FR; Schibensky J; König DP; Herten M; Antoch G; Krauspe R; Zilkens C
    BMJ Open; 2015 Feb; 5(2):e006895. PubMed ID: 25667150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Cartilage destruction in small joints by rheumatoid arthritis: assessment of fat-suppressed three-dimensional gradient-echo MR pulse sequences in vitro.
    Uhl M; Allmann KH; Ihling C; Hauer MP; Conca W; Langer M
    Skeletal Radiol; 1998 Dec; 27(12):677-82. PubMed ID: 9921929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Evaluation of grades 3 and 4 chondromalacia of the knee using T2*-weighted 3D gradient-echo articular cartilage imaging.
    Murphy BJ
    Skeletal Radiol; 2001 Jun; 30(6):305-11. PubMed ID: 11465769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. IDEAL 3D spoiled gradient echo of the articular cartilage of the knee on 3.0 T MRI: a comparison with conventional 3.0 T fast spin-echo T2 fat saturation image.
    Han CH; Park HJ; Lee SY; Chung EC; Choi SH; Yun JS; Rho MH
    Acta Radiol; 2015 Dec; 56(12):1479-86. PubMed ID: 25348476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Quantitative MR imaging evaluation of chondropathy in osteoarthritic knees.
    Drapé JL; Pessis E; Auleley GR; Chevrot A; Dougados M; Ayral X
    Radiology; 1998 Jul; 208(1):49-55. PubMed ID: 9646792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Orientation-dependent changes in MR signal intensity of articular cartilage: a manifestation of the "magic angle" effect.
    Wacker FK; Bolze X; Felsenberg D; Wolf KJ
    Skeletal Radiol; 1998 Jun; 27(6):306-10. PubMed ID: 9677646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. 3.0-T evaluation of knee cartilage by using three-dimensional IDEAL GRASS imaging: comparison with fast spin-echo imaging.
    Kijowski R; Blankenbaker DG; Woods MA; Shinki K; De Smet AA; Reeder SB
    Radiology; 2010 Apr; 255(1):117-27. PubMed ID: 20173102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Comparison between pig lumbar zypapophyseal joint cartilage acquired from multiple magnetic resonance image sequences and gross specimens].
    Liao H; Yu W; Wang W; Liao Y
    Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2010 Oct; 35(10):1064-72. PubMed ID: 21051831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Preliminary trial of three-dimensional water-excitation magnetization transfer contrast MR imaging of articular cartilage].
    Yoshioka H; Lang P; Ikeda K; Niitsu M; Itai Y
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 2001 Sep; 61(10):545-7. PubMed ID: 11676173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. MR imaging of knee hyaline cartilage: evaluation of two- and three-dimensional sequences.
    Tervonen O; Dietz MJ; Carmichael SW; Ehman RL
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 1993; 3(4):663-8. PubMed ID: 8347961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Three-dimensional gradient-echo MR imaging of the knee: comparison with arthroscopy in 100 patients.
    Heron CW; Calvert PT
    Radiology; 1992 Jun; 183(3):839-44. PubMed ID: 1584944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Magnetic resonance imaging of knee cartilage using a water selective balanced steady-state free precession sequence.
    Kornaat PR; Doornbos J; van der Molen AJ; Kloppenburg M; Nelissen RG; Hogendoorn PC; Bloem JL
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Nov; 20(5):850-6. PubMed ID: 15503345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. MR imaging of the knee: comparison of three-dimensional FISP and two-dimensional spin-echo pulse sequences.
    Solomon SL; Totty WG; Lee JK
    Radiology; 1989 Dec; 173(3):739-42. PubMed ID: 2813779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Accuracy of fat-suppressed three-dimensional spoiled gradient-echo FLASH MR imaging in the detection of patellofemoral articular cartilage abnormalities.
    Recht MP; Piraino DW; Paletta GA; Schils JP; Belhobek GH
    Radiology; 1996 Jan; 198(1):209-12. PubMed ID: 8539380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Comparison of different MRT techniques in the diagnosis of degenerative cartilage diseases. In vitro study of 50 joint specimens of the knee at T1.5].
    Bachmann G; Heinrichs C; Jürgensen I; Rominger M; Scheiter A; Rau WS
    Rofo; 1997 May; 166(5):429-36. PubMed ID: 9198516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Patterns of cartilage degeneration in knees with medial tibiofemoral offset.
    Siriwanarangsun P; Chen KC; Finkenstaedt T; Bae WC; Statum S; Gentili A; Chung CB
    Skeletal Radiol; 2019 Jun; 48(6):931-937. PubMed ID: 30357459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Articular cartilage and labral lesions of the glenohumeral joint: diagnostic performance of 3D water-excitation true FISP MR arthrography.
    Dietrich TJ; Zanetti M; Saupe N; Pfirrmann CW; Fucentese SF; Hodler J
    Skeletal Radiol; 2010 May; 39(5):473-80. PubMed ID: 20016888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Articular cartilage defects detected with 3D water-excitation true FISP: prospective comparison with sequences commonly used for knee imaging.
    Duc SR; Pfirrmann CW; Schmid MR; Zanetti M; Koch PP; Kalberer F; Hodler J
    Radiology; 2007 Oct; 245(1):216-23. PubMed ID: 17717327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Imaging articular cartilage defects with 3D fat-suppressed echo planar imaging: comparison with conventional 3D fat-suppressed gradient echo sequence and correlation with histology.
    Trattnig S; Huber M; Breitenseher MJ; Trnka HJ; Rand T; Kaider A; Helbich T; Imhof H; Resnick D
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1998; 22(1):8-14. PubMed ID: 9448754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.