These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17269188)

  • 1. The diagnostic "gold standard" in oncology: increasing importance and increasing concerns.
    Markman M
    Curr Oncol Rep; 2006 Jul; 8(4):237-8. PubMed ID: 17269188
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [The quality of measurement methods and its statistical estimation].
    Läärä E; Aro S
    Duodecim; 1988; 104(1):40-52. PubMed ID: 3409823
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sample size calculations for evaluating a diagnostic test when the gold standard is missing at random.
    Kosinski AS; Chen Y; Lyles RH
    Stat Med; 2011 Jan; 30(2):200. PubMed ID: 21204125
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Study design for the evaluation of diagnostic tests.
    Daya S
    Semin Reprod Endocrinol; 1996 May; 14(2):101-9. PubMed ID: 8796932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Regarding the paper 'Sample size calculations for evaluating a diagnostic test when the gold standard is missing at random'.
    Skaik YA
    Stat Med; 2010 Oct; 29(24):2568. PubMed ID: 20954220
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Anticipating missing reference standard data when planning diagnostic accuracy studies.
    Naaktgeboren CA; de Groot JA; Rutjes AW; Bossuyt PM; Reitsma JB; Moons KG
    BMJ; 2016 Feb; 352():i402. PubMed ID: 26861453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluating diagnostic tests with imperfect standards.
    Valenstein PN
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1990 Feb; 93(2):252-8. PubMed ID: 2405632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fuzzy gold standards: Approaches to handling an imperfect reference standard.
    Walsh T
    J Dent; 2018 Jul; 74 Suppl 1():S47-S49. PubMed ID: 29929589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. ['Gold standard', not 'golden standard'].
    Claassen JA
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2005 Dec; 149(52):2937. PubMed ID: 16402524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bayesian meta-analysis of diagnostic tests allowing for imperfect reference standards.
    Menten J; Boelaert M; Lesaffre E
    Stat Med; 2013 Dec; 32(30):5398-413. PubMed ID: 24003003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. ['Gold standard,' not 'golden standard'].
    Kneepkens CM
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2006 Mar; 150(11):644-5; author reply 645. PubMed ID: 16610511
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of diagnostic tests.
    Fardy JM
    Methods Mol Biol; 2009; 473():127-36. PubMed ID: 19160735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accuracy and predictive values in clinical decision-making.
    Eisenberg MJ
    Cleve Clin J Med; 1995; 62(5):311-6. PubMed ID: 7586487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Discrepant Analysis and Bias: a Micro-Comic Strip.
    McAdam AJ
    J Clin Microbiol; 2017 Oct; 55(10):2878-2879. PubMed ID: 28947507
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Problems in detecting misfit of latent class models in diagnostic research without a gold standard were shown.
    van Smeden M; Oberski DL; Reitsma JB; Vermunt JK; Moons KG; de Groot JA
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Jun; 74():158-66. PubMed ID: 26628335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A review of solutions for diagnostic accuracy studies with an imperfect or missing reference standard.
    Reitsma JB; Rutjes AW; Khan KS; Coomarasamy A; Bossuyt PM
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Aug; 62(8):797-806. PubMed ID: 19447581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evidence-based emergency medicine/editorial. The problem with sensitivity and specificity..
    Gallagher EJ
    Ann Emerg Med; 2003 Aug; 42(2):298-303. PubMed ID: 12883522
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Measurements of outcome.
    Conrad SA; McLarty JW
    Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol; 2009 Oct; 103(4 Suppl 1):S42-50. PubMed ID: 19891287
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cautionary tales in the clinical interpretation of studies of diagnostic tests.
    Scott IA; Greenberg PB; Poole PJ
    Intern Med J; 2008 Feb; 38(2):120-9. PubMed ID: 17645501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Reference standards in diagnostic research: problems and solutions].
    de Groot JA; Reitsma JB; Moons K
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2014; 159():A7202. PubMed ID: 25589276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.