These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17269899)

  • 1. In silico approaches to explore toxicity end points: issues and concerns for estimating human health effects.
    Matthews EJ; Contrera JF
    Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol; 2007 Feb; 3(1):125-34. PubMed ID: 17269899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The role of the European centre for the validation of alternative methods (ECVAM) in the validation of (Q)SARs.
    Worth AP; Hartung T; Van Leeuwen CJ
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2004; 15(5-6):345-58. PubMed ID: 15669694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Current and Future Perspectives on the Development, Evaluation, and Application of in Silico Approaches for Predicting Toxicity.
    Patlewicz G; Fitzpatrick JM
    Chem Res Toxicol; 2016 Apr; 29(4):438-51. PubMed ID: 26686752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Improving the Safety Assessment of Chemicals and Drug Candidates by the Integration of Bioinformatics and Chemoinformatics Data.
    Steger-Hartmann T; Pognan F
    Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol; 2018 Sep; 123 Suppl 5():29-36. PubMed ID: 29316298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Integrated testing and intelligent assessment-new challenges under REACH.
    Ahlers J; Stock F; Werschkun B
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2008 Oct; 15(7):565-72. PubMed ID: 18818964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The role of the European Chemicals Bureau in promoting the regulatory use of (Q)SAR methods.
    Worth AP; Bassan A; De Bruijn J; Gallegos Saliner A; Netzeva T; Patlewicz G; Pavan M; Tsakovska I; Eisenreich S
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2007; 18(1-2):111-25. PubMed ID: 17365963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An integrated decision-tree testing strategy for eye irritation with respect to the requirements of the EU REACH legislation.
    Grindon C; Combes R; Cronin MT; Roberts DW; Garrod JF
    Altern Lab Anim; 2008 Feb; 36(1):81-92. PubMed ID: 18333716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A critical assessment of the European Commission's proposals for the risk assessment and registration of chemical substances in the European Union.
    Combes R; Dandrea J; Balls M
    Altern Lab Anim; 2003; 31(3):353-64. PubMed ID: 15612876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An integrated decision-tree testing strategy for repeat dose toxicity with respect to the requirements of the EU REACH legislation.
    Grindon C; Combes R; Cronin MT; Roberts DW; Garrod JF
    Altern Lab Anim; 2008 Oct; 36 Suppl 1():139-47. PubMed ID: 19025337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. QSAR Use in REACH Analyses of Alternatives to Predict Human Health and Environmental Toxicity of Alternative Chemical Substances.
    Chinen K; Malloy T
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2020 Sep; 16(5):745-760. PubMed ID: 32162772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A review of the status of alternative approaches to animal testing and the development of integrated testing strategies for assessing the toxicity of chemicals under REACH--a summary of a DEFRA-funded project conducted by Liverpool John Moores University and FRAME.
    Grindon C; Combes R; Cronin MT; Roberts DW; Garrod J
    Altern Lab Anim; 2006 Mar; 34 Suppl 1():149-58. PubMed ID: 16555968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Computer models versus reality: how well do in silico models currently predict the sensitization potential of a substance.
    Teubner W; Mehling A; Schuster PX; Guth K; Worth A; Burton J; van Ravenzwaay B; Landsiedel R
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2013 Dec; 67(3):468-85. PubMed ID: 24090701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Animal testing and alternative approaches for the human health risk assessment under the proposed new European chemicals regulation.
    Höfer T; Gerner I; Gundert-Remy U; Liebsch M; Schulte A; Spielmann H; Vogel R; Wettig K
    Arch Toxicol; 2004 Oct; 78(10):549-64. PubMed ID: 15170526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Strengths and limitations of using repeat-dose toxicity studies to predict effects on fertility.
    Dent MP
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2007 Aug; 48(3):241-58. PubMed ID: 17512650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An integrated decision-tree testing strategy for repeat dose toxicity with respect to the requirements of the EU REACH legislation.
    Grindon C; Combes R; Cronin MT; Roberts DW; Garrod JF
    Altern Lab Anim; 2008 Feb; 36(1):93-101. PubMed ID: 18333717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The prospects for using (Q)SARs in a changing political environment--high expectations and a key role for the European Commission's joint research centre.
    Worth AP; Van Leeuwen CJ; Hartung T
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2004; 15(5-6):331-43. PubMed ID: 15669693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [AI-based QSAR Modeling for Prediction of Active Compounds in MIE/AOP].
    Uesawa Y
    Yakugaku Zasshi; 2020; 140(4):499-505. PubMed ID: 32238631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A quantitative in silico model for predicting skin sensitization using a nearest neighbours approach within expert-derived structure-activity alert spaces.
    Canipa SJ; Chilton ML; Hemingway R; Macmillan DS; Myden A; Plante JP; Tennant RE; Vessey JD; Steger-Hartmann T; Gould J; Hillegass J; Etter S; Smith BPC; White A; Sterchele P; De Smedt A; O'Brien D; Parakhia R
    J Appl Toxicol; 2017 Aug; 37(8):985-995. PubMed ID: 28244128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. How in silico and QSAR approaches can increase confidence in environmental hazard and risk assessment.
    Thomas PC; Bicherel P; Bauer FJ
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2019 Jan; 15(1):40-50. PubMed ID: 30447098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Integrated testing strategy (ITS) for bioaccumulation assessment under REACH.
    Lombardo A; Roncaglioni A; Benfentati E; Nendza M; Segner H; Fernández A; Kühne R; Franco A; Pauné E; Schüürmann G
    Environ Int; 2014 Aug; 69():40-50. PubMed ID: 24806447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.