These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17270193)

  • 1. Accuracy of circular contact area measurements with thin-film pressure sensors.
    Drewniak EI; Crisco JJ; Spenciner DB; Fleming BC
    J Biomech; 2007; 40(11):2569-72. PubMed ID: 17270193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of calibration method on Tekscan sensor accuracy.
    Brimacombe JM; Wilson DR; Hodgson AJ; Ho KC; Anglin C
    J Biomech Eng; 2009 Mar; 131(3):034503. PubMed ID: 19154074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accuracy and repeatability of a new method for measuring facet loads in the lumbar spine.
    Wilson DC; Niosi CA; Zhu QA; Oxland TR; Wilson DR
    J Biomech; 2006; 39(2):348-53. PubMed ID: 16321637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Measuring contact area, force, and pressure for bioengineering applications: using Fuji Film and TekScan systems.
    Bachus KN; DeMarco AL; Judd KT; Horwitz DS; Brodke DS
    Med Eng Phys; 2006 Jun; 28(5):483-8. PubMed ID: 16181797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of capacitive versus resistive joint contact stress sensors.
    Martinelli L; Hurschler C; Rosenbaum D
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2006 Jun; 447():214-20. PubMed ID: 16672899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Contact area inside the distal radioulnar joint: effect of axial loading and position of the forearm.
    Shaaban H; Giakas G; Bolton M; Williams R; Wicks P; Scheker LR; Lees VC
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2007 Mar; 22(3):313-8. PubMed ID: 17157421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Characterization of the performance of a custom program for image processing of pressure sensitive film.
    Muriuki MG; Gilbertson LG; Harner CD
    J Biomech Eng; 2009 Jan; 131(1):014503. PubMed ID: 19045933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of dynamic posterior stabilization on facet joint contact forces: an in vitro investigation.
    Niosi CA; Wilson DC; Zhu Q; Keynan O; Wilson DR; Oxland TR
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Jan; 33(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 18165744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effects of time and light exposure on contact and pressure measurements using Fuji prescale film.
    Patterson R; Pogue D; Viegas S
    Iowa Orthop J; 1997; 17():64-9. PubMed ID: 9234976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Estimation of discretization errors in contact pressure measurements.
    Fregly BJ; Sawyer WG
    J Biomech; 2003 Apr; 36(4):609-13. PubMed ID: 12600352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Validation of the Tekscan system for statistic and dynamic pressure measurements of the human femorotibial joint].
    Wirz D; Becker R; Li SF; Friederich NF; Müller W
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2002; 47(7-8):195-201. PubMed ID: 12201014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Experimental measurement of tibiofemoral contact area in a meniscectomized ovine model using a resistive pressure measuring sensor.
    von Lewinski G; Stukenborg-Colsman C; Ostermeier S; Hurschler C
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2006 Oct; 34(10):1607-14. PubMed ID: 17013659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Patellofemoral contact area and pressure after medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction.
    Melegari TM; Parks BG; Matthews LS
    Am J Sports Med; 2008 Apr; 36(4):747-52. PubMed ID: 18296543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Validation and determination of the sensing area of the KINOTEX sensor as part of development of a new mattress with an interface pressure-sensing system.
    Sakai K; Nakagami G; Matsui N; Sanada H; Kitagawa A; Tadaka E; Sugama J
    Biosci Trends; 2008 Feb; 2(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 20103897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessment of pedar and F-Scan revisited.
    Quesada P; Rash G; Jarboe N
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 1997 Apr; 12(3):S15. PubMed ID: 11415717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A new laser reflectance system capable of measuring changing cross-sectional area of soft tissues during tensile testing.
    Pokhai GG; Oliver ML; Gordon KD
    J Biomech Eng; 2009 Sep; 131(9):094504. PubMed ID: 19725701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A new technique to measure the dynamic contact pressures on the Tibial Plateau.
    Cottrell JM; Scholten P; Wanich T; Warren RF; Wright TM; Maher SA
    J Biomech; 2008 Jul; 41(10):2324-9. PubMed ID: 18539286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Validation of a novel minimally invasive intervertebral disc pressure sensor utilizing in-fiber Bragg gratings in a porcine model: an ex vivo study.
    Dennison CR; Wild PM; Dvorak MF; Wilson DR; Cripton PA
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Aug; 33(17):E589-94. PubMed ID: 18670326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Thigh-calf contact force measurements in deep knee flexion.
    Zelle J; Barink M; Loeffen R; De Waal Malefijt M; Verdonschot N
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2007 Aug; 22(7):821-6. PubMed ID: 17512647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Contact stresses in both compartments of the tibiofemoral joint are similar even when larger forces are applied to the medial compartment.
    Thambyah A
    Knee; 2007 Aug; 14(4):336-8. PubMed ID: 17561402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.