These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
325 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17270397)
1. Distraction osteogenesis versus bilateral sagittal split osteotomy for advancement of the retrognathic mandible: a review of the literature. Schreuder WH; Jansma J; Bierman MW; Vissink A Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Feb; 36(2):103-10. PubMed ID: 17270397 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Stability of mandibular advancement procedures: bilateral sagittal split osteotomy versus distraction osteogenesis. Vos MD; Baas EM; de Lange J; Bierenbroodspot F Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Jan; 38(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 18977640 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Long-lasting neurosensory disturbance following advancement of the retrognathic mandible: distraction osteogenesis versus bilateral sagittal split osteotomy. Wijbenga JG; Verlinden CR; Jansma J; Becking AG; Stegenga B Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Jul; 38(7):719-25. PubMed ID: 19394196 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of alveolar nerve function after surgical lengthening of the mandible by a bilateral sagittal split osteotomy or distraction osteogenesis. Baas EM; de Lange J; Horsthuis RB Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Jun; 39(6):529-33. PubMed ID: 20430586 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Bilateral sagittal split osteotomies versus mandibular distraction osteogenesis: a prospective clinical trial comparing inferior alveolar nerve function and complications. Ow A; Cheung LK Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Aug; 39(8):756-60. PubMed ID: 20452186 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Skeletal stability and complications of bilateral sagittal split osteotomies and mandibular distraction osteogenesis: an evidence-based review. Ow A; Cheung LK J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Nov; 67(11):2344-53. PubMed ID: 19837301 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Long term stability of mandibular advancement procedures: bilateral sagittal split osteotomy versus distraction osteogenesis. Baas EM; Pijpe J; de Lange J Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Feb; 41(2):137-41. PubMed ID: 22137334 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Subjective alveolar nerve function after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy or distraction osteogenesis of mandible. Baas EM; Horsthuis RB; de Lange J J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Apr; 70(4):910-8. PubMed ID: 21763047 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Bilateral sagittal split osteotomies versus mandibular distraction osteogenesis: which is better? Ow AT; Cheung LK Ann R Australas Coll Dent Surg; 2008 Jun; 19():55-7. PubMed ID: 19728632 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Original sagittal split osteotomy revisited for mandibular distraction. Choi JY; Hwang KG; Baek SH; Lee JH; Kim TW; Kim MJ; Chang YI J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2001 Jun; 29(3):165-73. PubMed ID: 11465256 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Duration of orthodontic treatment and mandibular lengthening by means of distraction or bilateral sagittal split osteotomy in patients with Angle Class II malocclusions. Breuning KH; van Strijen PJ; Prahl-Andersen B; Tuinzing DB Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Jan; 127(1):25-9. PubMed ID: 15643411 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Skeletal stability after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy or distraction osteogenesis of the mandible: a randomized clinical trial. Baas EM; Bierenbroodspot F; de Lange J Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 May; 44(5):615-20. PubMed ID: 25595452 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Stability of skeletal Class II correction with 2 surgical techniques: the sagittal split ramus osteotomy and the total mandibular subapical alveolar osteotomy. Pangrazio-Kulbersh V; Berger JL; Kaczynski R; Shunock M Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Aug; 120(2):134-43. PubMed ID: 11500654 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]