331 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17270397)
1. Distraction osteogenesis versus bilateral sagittal split osteotomy for advancement of the retrognathic mandible: a review of the literature.
Schreuder WH; Jansma J; Bierman MW; Vissink A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Feb; 36(2):103-10. PubMed ID: 17270397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Stability of mandibular advancement procedures: bilateral sagittal split osteotomy versus distraction osteogenesis.
Vos MD; Baas EM; de Lange J; Bierenbroodspot F
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Jan; 38(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 18977640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Long-lasting neurosensory disturbance following advancement of the retrognathic mandible: distraction osteogenesis versus bilateral sagittal split osteotomy.
Wijbenga JG; Verlinden CR; Jansma J; Becking AG; Stegenga B
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Jul; 38(7):719-25. PubMed ID: 19394196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of alveolar nerve function after surgical lengthening of the mandible by a bilateral sagittal split osteotomy or distraction osteogenesis.
Baas EM; de Lange J; Horsthuis RB
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Jun; 39(6):529-33. PubMed ID: 20430586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Bilateral sagittal split osteotomies versus mandibular distraction osteogenesis: a prospective clinical trial comparing inferior alveolar nerve function and complications.
Ow A; Cheung LK
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Aug; 39(8):756-60. PubMed ID: 20452186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Skeletal stability and complications of bilateral sagittal split osteotomies and mandibular distraction osteogenesis: an evidence-based review.
Ow A; Cheung LK
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Nov; 67(11):2344-53. PubMed ID: 19837301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Long term stability of mandibular advancement procedures: bilateral sagittal split osteotomy versus distraction osteogenesis.
Baas EM; Pijpe J; de Lange J
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Feb; 41(2):137-41. PubMed ID: 22137334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Subjective alveolar nerve function after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy or distraction osteogenesis of mandible.
Baas EM; Horsthuis RB; de Lange J
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Apr; 70(4):910-8. PubMed ID: 21763047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Bilateral sagittal split osteotomies versus mandibular distraction osteogenesis: which is better?
Ow AT; Cheung LK
Ann R Australas Coll Dent Surg; 2008 Jun; 19():55-7. PubMed ID: 19728632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Original sagittal split osteotomy revisited for mandibular distraction.
Choi JY; Hwang KG; Baek SH; Lee JH; Kim TW; Kim MJ; Chang YI
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2001 Jun; 29(3):165-73. PubMed ID: 11465256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Bilateral sagittal split osteotomies and mandibular distraction osteogenesis: a randomized controlled trial comparing skeletal stability.
Ow A; Cheung LK
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Jan; 109(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 19875317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Duration of orthodontic treatment and mandibular lengthening by means of distraction or bilateral sagittal split osteotomy in patients with Angle Class II malocclusions.
Breuning KH; van Strijen PJ; Prahl-Andersen B; Tuinzing DB
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Jan; 127(1):25-9. PubMed ID: 15643411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Skeletal stability after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy or distraction osteogenesis of the mandible: a randomized clinical trial.
Baas EM; Bierenbroodspot F; de Lange J
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 May; 44(5):615-20. PubMed ID: 25595452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Stability of skeletal Class II correction with 2 surgical techniques: the sagittal split ramus osteotomy and the total mandibular subapical alveolar osteotomy.
Pangrazio-Kulbersh V; Berger JL; Kaczynski R; Shunock M
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Aug; 120(2):134-43. PubMed ID: 11500654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Factors affecting neurosensory disturbance after mandibular bilateral sagittal split osteotomy.
Ylikontiola L; Kinnunen J; Oikarinen K
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2000 Nov; 58(11):1234-9; discussion 1239-40. PubMed ID: 11078134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Alteration of the mandibular plane during sagittal split advancement: short- and long-term stability.
Frey DR; Hatch JP; Van Sickels JE; Dolce C; Rugh JD
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2007 Aug; 104(2):160-9. PubMed ID: 17428696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Bilateral sagittal split osteotomy versus distraction osteogenesis of the mandible: a randomized clinical trial.
Baas EM; Bierenbroodspot F; de Lange J
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Feb; 44(2):180-8. PubMed ID: 25457820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Risk factors of nerve injury during mandibular sagittal split osteotomy.
Teerijoki-Oksa T; Jääskeläinen SK; Forssell K; Forssell H; Vähätalo K; Tammisalo T; Virtanen A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2002 Feb; 31(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 11936397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Stability of hard tissue profile after mandibular setback in sagittal split osteotomies: a longitudinal and long-term follow-up study.
Joss CU; Thüer UW
Eur J Orthod; 2008 Aug; 30(4):352-8. PubMed ID: 18678756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Factors affecting the stability of bilateral sagittal split osteotomy of a mandible.
Hoffmannová J; Foltán R; Vlk M; Klíma K; Pavlíková G; Bulik O
Prague Med Rep; 2008; 109(4):286-97. PubMed ID: 19537679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
