These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17270631)

  • 1. Contemporary laparoscopic and open radical retropubic prostatectomy: pathologic outcomes and Kattan postoperative nomograms are equivalent.
    Park S; Jaffer O; Lotan Y; Saboorian H; Roehrborn CG; Cadeddu JA
    Urology; 2007 Jan; 69(1):118-22. PubMed ID: 17270631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The addition of robotic surgery to an established laparoscopic radical prostatectomy program: effect on positive surgical margins.
    Trabulsi EJ; Linden RA; Gomella LG; McGinnis DE; Strup SE; Lallas CD
    Can J Urol; 2008 Apr; 15(2):3994-9. PubMed ID: 18405448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pathologic outcome of laparoscopic and open radical prostatectomy.
    Dahl DM; He W; Lazarus R; McDougal WS; Wu CL
    Urology; 2006 Dec; 68(6):1253-6. PubMed ID: 17141845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prostate cancer disease-free survival after radical retropubic prostatectomy in patients older than 70 years compared to younger cohorts.
    Malaeb BS; Rashid HH; Lotan Y; Khoddami SM; Shariat SF; Sagalowsky AI; McConnell JD; Roehrborn CG; Koeneman KS
    Urol Oncol; 2007; 25(4):291-7. PubMed ID: 17628294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Stage migration in localized prostate cancer has no effect on the post-radical prostatectomy Kattan nomogram.
    Thanigasalam R; Rasiah KK; Stricker PD; Haynes AM; Sutherland SI; Sutherland RL; Henshall SM; Horvath LG
    BJU Int; 2010 Mar; 105(5):642-7. PubMed ID: 19751263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy.
    Smith JA; Chan RC; Chang SS; Herrell SD; Clark PE; Baumgartner R; Cookson MS
    J Urol; 2007 Dec; 178(6):2385-9; discussion 2389-90. PubMed ID: 17936849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Isolated seminal vesicle invasion imparts better outcomes after radical retropubic prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer: prognostic stratification of pt3b disease by nodal and margin status.
    Masterson TA; Pettus JA; Middleton RG; Stephenson RA
    Urology; 2005 Jul; 66(1):152-5. PubMed ID: 15992904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Complete resection of seminal vesicles at radical prostatectomy results in substantial long-term disease-free survival: multi-institutional study of 6740 patients.
    Baccala A; Reuther AM; Bianco FJ; Scardino PT; Kattan MW; Klein EA
    Urology; 2007 Mar; 69(3):536-40. PubMed ID: 17382160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Long-term oncological and continence outcomes after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a single-centre experience.
    Busch J; Stephan C; Herold A; Erber B; Kempkensteffen C; Hinz S; Lein M; Weikert S; Miller K; Magheli A
    BJU Int; 2012 Dec; 110(11 Pt C):E985-90. PubMed ID: 22672442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Validation of two preoperative Kattan nomograms predicting recurrence after radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer in Turkey: a multicenter study of the Uro-oncology Society.
    Eskicorapci SY; Türkeri L; Karabulut E; Cal C; Akpinar H; Baltaci S; Baykal K; ; Kattan MW; Ozen H
    Urology; 2009 Dec; 74(6):1289-95. PubMed ID: 19589584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Is biopsy Gleason score independently associated with biochemical progression following radical prostatectomy after adjusting for pathological Gleason score?
    Fitzsimons NJ; Presti JC; Kane CJ; Terris MK; Aronson WJ; Amling CL; Freedland SJ
    J Urol; 2006 Dec; 176(6 Pt 1):2453-8; discussion 2458. PubMed ID: 17085127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Radical prostatectomy in men aged >or=70 years: effect of age on upgrading, upstaging, and the accuracy of a preoperative nomogram.
    Richstone L; Bianco FJ; Shah HH; Kattan MW; Eastham JA; Scardino PT; Scherr DS
    BJU Int; 2008 Mar; 101(5):541-6. PubMed ID: 18257855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital (SEARCH) nomogram for risk stratification in intermediate risk group of men with prostate cancer: validation in the Duke Prostate Center database.
    Jayachandran J; Schroeck F; Sun L; Gerber L; Moreira DM; Moul JW; Freedland SJ
    BJU Int; 2010 Jan; 105(2):180-4. PubMed ID: 19709074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. 3-year actuarial biochemical recurrence-free survival following laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: experience from a tertiary referral center in the United States.
    Pavlovich CP; Trock BJ; Sulman A; Wagner AA; Mettee LZ; Su LM
    J Urol; 2008 Mar; 179(3):917-21; discussion 921-2. PubMed ID: 18207191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Selective versus standard ligature of the deep venous complex during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: effects on continence, blood loss, and margin status.
    Porpiglia F; Fiori C; Grande S; Morra I; Scarpa RM
    Eur Urol; 2009 Jun; 55(6):1377-83. PubMed ID: 19243886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Survival results in patients with screen-detected prostate cancer versus physician-referred patients treated with radical prostatectomy: early results.
    Roehl KA; Eggener SE; Loeb S; Smith ND; Antenor JA; Catalona WJ
    Urol Oncol; 2006; 24(6):465-71. PubMed ID: 17138126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cross-cultural validation of a prognostic tool: example of the Kattan preoperative nomogram as a predictor of prostate cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy.
    Rouprêt M; Hupertan V; Comperat E; Drouin SJ; Phé V; Xylinas E; Demanse D; Sibony M; Richard F; Cussenot O
    BJU Int; 2009 Sep; 104(6):813-7; discussion 817-8. PubMed ID: 19254280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of operative and functional outcomes of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and radical retropubic prostatectomy: single surgeon experience.
    Ghavamian R; Knoll A; Boczko J; Melman A
    Urology; 2006 Jun; 67(6):1241-6. PubMed ID: 16678887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Radical prostatectomy: a prospective comparison of oncological and functional results between open and laparoscopic approaches.
    Roumeguere T; Bollens R; Vanden Bossche M; Rochet D; Bialek D; Hoffman P; Quackels T; Damoun A; Wespes E; Schulman CC; Zlotta AR
    World J Urol; 2003 May; 20(6):360-6. PubMed ID: 12682770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: transperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy versus extraperitoneal endoscopic radical prostatectomy.
    Phinthusophon K; Nualyong C; Srinualnad S; Taweemonkongsap T; Amornvesukij T
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2007 Dec; 90(12):2644-50. PubMed ID: 18386715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.