779 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17274707)
21. Vertical augmentation with interpositional blocks of anorganic bovine bone vs. 7-mm-long implants in posterior mandibles: 1-year results of a randomized clinical trial.
Felice P; Pellegrino G; Checchi L; Pistilli R; Esposito M
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 Dec; 21(12):1394-403. PubMed ID: 20678136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Radiologic study of marginal bone loss around 108 dental implants and its relationship to smoking, implant location, and morphology.
Peñarrocha M; Palomar M; Sanchis JM; Guarinos J; Balaguer J
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(6):861-7. PubMed ID: 15623062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Osteogenesis distraction and platelet-rich plasma: combined use in restoration of severe atrophic mandible. Long-term results.
Robiony M; Zorzan E; Polini F; Sembronio S; Toro C; Politi M
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Nov; 19(11):1202-10. PubMed ID: 18983325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Bone resorption and complications in alveolar distraction osteogenesis.
Ettl T; Gerlach T; Schüsselbauer T; Gosau M; Reichert TE; Driemel O
Clin Oral Investig; 2010 Oct; 14(5):481-9. PubMed ID: 19774402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Radiographic follow-up analysis of Brånemark dental implants.
Pikner SS
Swed Dent J Suppl; 2008; (194):5-69, 2. PubMed ID: 18652086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. In-patient comparison of immediate and conventional loaded implants in mandibular molar sites within 12 months.
Güncü MB; Aslan Y; Tümer C; Güncü GN; Uysal S
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Apr; 19(4):335-41. PubMed ID: 18294232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The extremely resorbed mandible, 10-year results of a randomized controlled trial on 3 treatment strategies.
Stellingsma K; Raghoebar GM; Visser A; Vissink A; Meijer HJ
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Aug; 25(8):926-32. PubMed ID: 23638947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A 5-year longitudinal study of the clinical effectiveness of ITI solid-screw implants in the treatment of mandibular edentulism.
Behneke A; Behneke N; d'Hoedt B
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(6):799-810. PubMed ID: 12507239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Efficacy of threaded hydroxyapatite-coated implants placed in the posterior mandible in support of fixed prostheses.
Buchs AU; Hahn J; Vassos DM
Implant Dent; 1996; 5(2):106-10. PubMed ID: 9081576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Immediate loading of Brånemark System TiUnite and machined-surface implants in the posterior mandible: a randomized open-ended clinical trial.
Rocci A; Martignoni M; Gottlow J
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2003; 5 Suppl 1():57-63. PubMed ID: 12691651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Ridge expansion alone or in combination with guided bone regeneration to facilitate implant placement in narrow alveolar ridges: a retrospective study.
Tang YL; Yuan J; Song YL; Ma W; Chao X; Li DH
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015 Feb; 26(2):204-11. PubMed ID: 24330035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Alveolar distraction osteogenesis vs. vertical guided bone regeneration for the correction of vertically deficient edentulous ridges: a 1-3-year prospective study on humans.
Chiapasco M; Romeo E; Casentini P; Rimondini L
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2004 Feb; 15(1):82-95. PubMed ID: 14731181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Maxillary alveolar ridge reconstruction with nonvascularized autogenous block bone: clinical results.
Barone A; Covani U
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Oct; 65(10):2039-46. PubMed ID: 17884536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Efficacy of cancellous block allograft augmentation prior to implant placement in the posterior atrophic mandible.
Nissan J; Ghelfan O; Mardinger O; Calderon S; Chaushu G
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2011 Dec; 13(4):279-85. PubMed ID: 19673921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Crestal bone-level changes around implants placed in post-extraction sockets augmented with demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft: a retrospective radiographic study.
Koutouzis T; Lundgren T
J Periodontol; 2010 Oct; 81(10):1441-8. PubMed ID: 20569171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Effects of sinus membrane perforations on the success of dental implants placed in the augmented sinus.
Karabuda C; Arisan V; Özyuvaci H
J Periodontol; 2006 Dec; 77(12):1991-7. PubMed ID: 17209783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Augmentation in two stages of atrophic alveolar bone prior to dental rehabilitation: a case report.
Zahrani AA
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Sep; 8(6):57-63. PubMed ID: 17846672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Radiographic changes around immediately restored dental implants in periodontally susceptible patients: 1-year results.
Horwitz J; Zuabi O; Machtei E
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(3):531-8. PubMed ID: 18700379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. One-step surgical placement of Brånemark implants: a prospective multicenter clinical study.
Becker W; Becker BE; Israelson H; Lucchini JP; Handelsman M; Ammons W; Rosenberg E; Rose L; Tucker LM; Lekholm U
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(4):454-62. PubMed ID: 9274074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Bone response to functioning implants in dog mandibular alveolar ridges augmented with distraction osteogenesis.
Block MS; Almerico B; Crawford C; Gardiner D; Chang A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(3):342-51. PubMed ID: 9638004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
