282 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17275060)
1. The influence of punctuation and word class on distributed processing in normal reading.
Pynte J; Kennedy A
Vision Res; 2007 Apr; 47(9):1215-27. PubMed ID: 17275060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Parafoveal-on-foveal effects on eye movements in text reading: does an extra space make a difference?
Drieghe D; Brysbaert M; Desmet T
Vision Res; 2005 Jun; 45(13):1693-706. PubMed ID: 15792844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Parafoveal-on-foveal effects in normal reading.
Kennedy A; Pynte J
Vision Res; 2005 Jan; 45(2):153-68. PubMed ID: 15581917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An influence over eye movements in reading exerted from beyond the level of the word: evidence from reading English and French.
Pynte J; Kennedy A
Vision Res; 2006 Oct; 46(22):3786-801. PubMed ID: 16938333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Eye movement control during reading: foveal load and parafoveal processing.
Schroyens W; Vitu F; Brysbaert M; d'Ydewalle G
Q J Exp Psychol A; 1999 Nov; 52(4):1021-46. PubMed ID: 10605397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of parafoveal word length and orthographic features on initial fixation landing positions in reading.
Plummer P; Rayner K
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Jul; 74(5):950-63. PubMed ID: 22391893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Parafoveal processing in word recognition.
Kennedy A
Q J Exp Psychol A; 2000 May; 53(2):429-55. PubMed ID: 10881613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Parafoveal processing in reading.
Schotter ER; Angele B; Rayner K
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Jan; 74(1):5-35. PubMed ID: 22042596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Right visual field advantage in parafoveal processing: evidence from eye-fixation-related potentials.
Simola J; Holmqvist K; Lindgren M
Brain Lang; 2009 Nov; 111(2):101-13. PubMed ID: 19782390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Parafoveal preview benefit in reading is not cumulative across multiple saccades.
McDonald SA
Vision Res; 2005 Jun; 45(14):1829-34. PubMed ID: 15797772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Do Chinese readers obtain preview benefit from word n + 2? Evidence from eye movements.
Yang J; Wang S; Xu Y; Rayner K
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Aug; 35(4):1192-204. PubMed ID: 19653758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Parafoveal load of word N+1 modulates preprocessing effectiveness of word N+2 in Chinese reading.
Yan M; Kliegl R; Shu H; Pan J; Zhou X
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Dec; 36(6):1669-76. PubMed ID: 20731511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Re-evaluating split-fovea processing in word recognition: effects of word length.
Jordan TR; Paterson KB; Stachurski M
Cortex; 2009 Apr; 45(4):495-505. PubMed ID: 19231478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Word processing in the parafoveal region.
Lee CH; Kim K
Int J Psychol; 2009 Oct; 44(5):369-77. PubMed ID: 22029615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Re-evaluating split-fovea processing in word recognition: effects of word length during monocular viewing.
Jordan TR; Paterson KB; Kurtev S; Xu M
Cortex; 2010 Jan; 46(1):100-5. PubMed ID: 19147129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Do readers obtain preview benefit from word N + 2? A test of serial attention shift versus distributed lexical processing models of eye movement control in reading.
Rayner K; Juhasz BJ; Brown SJ
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Feb; 33(1):230-45. PubMed ID: 17311490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The implications of foveal splitting for saccade planning in reading.
McDonald SA; Shillcock RC
Vision Res; 2005 Mar; 45(6):801-20. PubMed ID: 15639506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Transposed-letter effects in reading: evidence from eye movements and parafoveal preview.
Johnson RL; Perea M; Rayner K
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Feb; 33(1):209-29. PubMed ID: 17311489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evidence for delayed parafoveal-on-foveal effects from word n+2 in reading.
Risse S; Kliegl R
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Aug; 38(4):1026-42. PubMed ID: 22428669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Frequency and predictability effects in the Dundee Corpus: an eye movement analysis.
Kennedy A; Pynte J; Murray WS; Paul SA
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(3):601-18. PubMed ID: 22643118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
