293 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17275151)
1. Influence of changes in stem positioning on femoral loading after THR using a short-stemmed hip implant.
Speirs AD; Heller MO; Taylor WR; Duda GN; Perka C
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2007 May; 22(4):431-9. PubMed ID: 17275151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Bone remodelling inside a cemented resurfaced femoral head.
Gupta S; New AM; Taylor M
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 Jul; 21(6):594-602. PubMed ID: 16542761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Noncemented total hip arthroplasty: influence of extramedullary parameters on initial implant stability and on bone-implant interface stresses].
Ramaniraka NA; Rakotomanana LR; Rubin PJ; Leyvraz P
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2000 Oct; 86(6):590-7. PubMed ID: 11060433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Tissue differentiation around a short stemmed metaphyseal loading implant employing a modified mechanoregulatory algorithm: a finite element study.
Puthumanapully PK; Browne M
J Orthop Res; 2011 May; 29(5):787-94. PubMed ID: 21437960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Migration and cyclic motion of a new short-stemmed hip prosthesis--a biomechanical in vitro study.
Westphal FM; Bishop N; Honl M; Hille E; Püschel K; Morlock MM
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 Oct; 21(8):834-40. PubMed ID: 16806616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Influence of the change in stem length on the load transfer and bone remodelling for a cemented resurfaced femur.
Pal B; Gupta S; New AM
J Biomech; 2010 Nov; 43(15):2908-14. PubMed ID: 20728891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Finite element analysis of changes in femoral stresses after elite total hip arthroplasty].
He RX; Luo YM; Yan SG; Wu HB
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2004 Sep; 84(18):1549-53. PubMed ID: 15500718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Finite element modeling of resurfacing hip prosthesis: estimation of accuracy through experimental validation.
Taddei F; Martelli S; Gill HS; Cristofolini L; Viceconti M
J Biomech Eng; 2010 Feb; 132(2):021002. PubMed ID: 20370239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Role of loads and prosthesis material properties on the mechanics of the proximal femur after total hip arthroplasty.
Cheal EJ; Spector M; Hayes WC
J Orthop Res; 1992 May; 10(3):405-22. PubMed ID: 1569504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. THA loading arising from increased femoral anteversion and offset may lead to critical cement stresses.
Kleemann RU; Heller MO; Stoeckle U; Taylor WR; Duda GN
J Orthop Res; 2003 Sep; 21(5):767-74. PubMed ID: 12919861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The biomechanical effect of anteversion and modular neck offset on stress shielding for short-stem versus conventional long-stem hip implants.
Goshulak P; Samiezadeh S; Aziz MS; Bougherara H; Zdero R; Schemitsch EH
Med Eng Phys; 2016 Mar; 38(3):232-40. PubMed ID: 26774671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Bone remodeling after total hip arthroplasty with a short stemmed metaphyseal loading implant: finite element analysis validated by a prospective DEXA investigation.
Lerch M; Kurtz A; Stukenborg-Colsman C; Nolte I; Weigel N; Bouguecha A; Behrens BA
J Orthop Res; 2012 Nov; 30(11):1822-9. PubMed ID: 22513505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Changes in femur stress after hip resurfacing arthroplasty: response to physiological loads.
Little JP; Taddei F; Viceconti M; Murray DW; Gill HS
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2007 May; 22(4):440-8. PubMed ID: 17257719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Surgical variables affect the mechanics of a hip resurfacing system.
Long JP; Bartel DL
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2006 Dec; 453():115-22. PubMed ID: 17016222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Influence of proximal stem geometry and stem-cement interface characteristics on bone and cement stresses in femoral hip arthroplasty: finite element analysis].
Massin P; Astoin E; Lavaste F
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2003 Apr; 89(2):134-43. PubMed ID: 12844057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence of interface condition and implant design on bone remodelling and failure risk for the resurfaced femoral head.
Rothstock S; Uhlenbrock A; Bishop N; Laird L; Nassutt R; Morlock M
J Biomech; 2011 Jun; 44(9):1646-53. PubMed ID: 21511258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Strain distribution in the proximal femur with flexible composite and metallic femoral components under axial and torsional loads.
Otani T; Whiteside LA; White SE
J Biomed Mater Res; 1993 May; 27(5):575-85. PubMed ID: 8314810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Strain adaptive bone remodelling: influence of the implantation technique.
Behrens BA; Bouguecha A; Nolte I; Meyer-Lindenberg A; Stukenborg-Colsman C; Pressel T
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2008; 133():33-44. PubMed ID: 18376011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Biomechanical evaluation of two types of short-stemmed hip prostheses compared to the trust plate prosthesis by three-dimensional measurement of micromotions.
Fottner A; Schmid M; Birkenmaier C; Mazoochian F; Plitz W; Volkmar J
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2009 Jun; 24(5):429-34. PubMed ID: 19307048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Femoral strain changes after total hip arthroplasty--patient-specific finite element analyses 12 years after operation.
Lengsfeld M; Burchard R; Günther D; Pressel T; Schmitt J; Leppek R; Griss P
Med Eng Phys; 2005 Oct; 27(8):649-54. PubMed ID: 16139763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
