277 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17275739)
1. Global clinical data interchange standards are here!
Souza T; Kush R; Evans JP
Drug Discov Today; 2007 Feb; 12(3-4):174-81. PubMed ID: 17275739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The case for the HL7 standard.
Simborg DW
Comput Healthc; 1988 Jan; 9(1):39-40, 42. PubMed ID: 10285216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Managing information: today's integrated healthcare enterprises.
Talbott N
Healthc Inform; 1994 Jun; Suppl():24, 26, 28. PubMed ID: 10135272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Interface gateways: defining the solutions.
Johnson R; Zobian M
Healthc Inform; 1994 Feb; 11(2):34-6, 38, 40. PubMed ID: 10132398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Paperless by 2000: implementing EDI (electronic data interchange) for healthcare claims processing.
Gittelman M
Healthc Inform; 1992 Nov; 9(11):86-9. PubMed ID: 10122404
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The effect of information systems architecture on health care data quality.
Quinn JF
Top Health Inf Manage; 1994 Nov; 15(2):26-36. PubMed ID: 10138525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. CDISC standard-based electronic archiving of clinical trials.
Kuchinke W; Aerts J; Semler SC; Ohmann C
Methods Inf Med; 2009; 48(5):408-13. PubMed ID: 19621114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reducing costs through electronic data interchange.
Chapin-Strike S
J Healthc Mater Manage; 1994 Jan; 12(1):22-4, 28. PubMed ID: 10131505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Extended cooperation in clinical studies through exchange of CDISC metadata between different study software solutions.
Kuchinke W; Wiegelmann S; Verplancke P; Ohmann C
Methods Inf Med; 2006; 45(4):441-6. PubMed ID: 16964363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Laboratory and software applications for clinical trials: the global laboratory environment.
Briscoe C
Bioanalysis; 2011 Nov; 3(21):2381-4. PubMed ID: 22074278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Artifacts and collaborative work in healthcare: methodological, theoretical, and technological implications of the tangible.
Xiao Y
J Biomed Inform; 2005 Feb; 38(1):26-33. PubMed ID: 15694883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Systems integration. How will new standards help health care organizations tackle the challenge of easing the flow of data?
Siwicki B
Health Data Manag; 1998 Feb; 6(2):74-6, 78, 80 passim. PubMed ID: 10177792
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The clinical data repository: provider survey '96.
Winsten D
Healthc Inform; 1996 Jul; 13(7):45-6, 48, 50-4. PubMed ID: 10159224
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Improving interoperability and clinical data standards.
Goldstein D
Manag Care Interface; 2003 Mar; 16(3):68-9. PubMed ID: 12715414
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical quality assurance in the pharmaceutical industry.
Donahue JJ
Cancer Treat Rep; 1985 Oct; 69(10):1195-7. PubMed ID: 4042098
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Drug information resources for health professionals and consumers.
Durkin C
Natl Netw; 1998 Feb; 22(3):10-1. PubMed ID: 10176590
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Communication standards: problems and future trends.
Dudeck J
Stud Health Technol Inform; 1997; 45():148-55. PubMed ID: 10175356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Uniform standards are basic building blocks for Electronic Data Interchange. Healthcare EDI Coalition.
Hagemeier G
J Healthc Resour Manag; 1997; 15(6):26. PubMed ID: 10169859
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Information models for data sharing.
Quaglini S
Neurol Sci; 2006 Jun; 27 Suppl 3():S281-3. PubMed ID: 16752069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Systems review. Interoperability: data interchange systems.
Andrew W
Healthc Inform; 1995 Jun; 12(6):41-2, 44, 46-8. PubMed ID: 10143297
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]