These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

241 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17275902)

  • 1. The effects of self-disclosure and non self-disclosure of stuttering on listeners' perceptions of a person who stutters.
    Healey EC; Gabel RM; Daniels DE; Kawai N
    J Fluency Disord; 2007; 32(1):51-69. PubMed ID: 17275902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Listener responses according to stuttering self-acknowledgment and modification.
    Lee K; Manning WH
    J Fluency Disord; 2010 Jun; 35(2):110-22. PubMed ID: 20609332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Listener perceptions of stuttering across two presentation modes: a quantitative and qualitative approach.
    Panico J; Healey EC; Brouwer K; Susca M
    J Fluency Disord; 2005; 30(1):65-85. PubMed ID: 15769499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Impact of self-disclosure and communication competence on perceived listener distraction.
    Werle D; Byrd CT; Coalson GA
    J Commun Disord; 2023; 103():106333. PubMed ID: 37130470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Effects of Different Sources of Stuttering Disclosure on the Perceptions of a Child Who Stutters.
    Snyder G; Williams MG; Adams C; Blanchet P
    Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch; 2020 Jul; 51(3):745-760. PubMed ID: 32302261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical utility of self-disclosure for adults who stutter: Apologetic versus informative statements.
    Byrd CT; Croft R; Gkalitsiou Z; Hampton E
    J Fluency Disord; 2017 Dec; 54():1-13. PubMed ID: 29195623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effects of self-disclosure on the communicative interaction between a person who stutters and a normally fluent speaker.
    Mancinelli JM
    J Fluency Disord; 2019 Mar; 59():1-20. PubMed ID: 30500438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Effects of Different Sources and Modalities of Stuttering Disclosure on Listeners' Perceptions of a Child Who Stutters.
    Snyder G; McKnight Sinak P; Manahan A; Kornisch M; Blanchet P
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2023; 75(4):253-264. PubMed ID: 36746128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Middle school students' perceptions of a peer who stutters.
    Evans D; Healey EC; Kawai N; Rowland S
    J Fluency Disord; 2008 Sep; 33(3):203-19. PubMed ID: 18762062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Does the clinical utility of self-disclosure of stuttering transcend culturally and linguistically diverse populations?
    Croft RL; Byrd CT
    Int J Speech Lang Pathol; 2021 Oct; 23(5):548-558. PubMed ID: 33544005
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Social Judgments of Digitally Manipulated Stuttered Speech: An Evaluation of Self-Disclosure on Cognition.
    Ferguson AM; Roche JM; Arnold HS
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Nov; 62(11):3986-4000. PubMed ID: 31697574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Listener perceptions of stuttering, prolonged speech, and verbal avoidance behaviors.
    Von Tiling J
    J Commun Disord; 2011; 44(2):161-72. PubMed ID: 20947094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. What the literature tells us about listeners' reactions to stuttering: implications for the clinical management of stuttering.
    Healey EC
    Semin Speech Lang; 2010 Nov; 31(4):227-35. PubMed ID: 21080295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Listener perceptions along a fluency--disfluency continuum: a phenomenological analysis.
    Susca M; Healey EC
    J Fluency Disord; 2002; 27(2):135-60; quiz 160-1. PubMed ID: 12145983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The speech naturalness of people who stutter speaking under delayed auditory feedback as perceived by different groups of listeners.
    Van Borsel J; Eeckhout H
    J Fluency Disord; 2008 Sep; 33(3):241-51. PubMed ID: 18762064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Investigations of the impact of altered auditory feedback in-the-ear devices on the speech of people who stutter: initial fitting and 4-month follow-up.
    Stuart A; Kalinowski J; Rastatter M; Saltuklaroglu T; Dayalu V
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2004; 39(1):93-113. PubMed ID: 14660188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Effects of Self-Disclosure on Male and Female Perceptions of Individuals Who Stutter.
    Byrd CT; McGill M; Gkalitsiou Z; Cappellini C
    Am J Speech Lang Pathol; 2017 Feb; 26(1):69-80. PubMed ID: 28056467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Factors affecting occupational advice for speakers who do and do not stutter.
    Logan KJ; O'Connor EM
    J Fluency Disord; 2012 Mar; 37(1):25-41. PubMed ID: 22325920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Elementary school students' perceptions of stuttering: A mixed model approach.
    Panico J; Healey EC; Knopik J
    J Fluency Disord; 2015 Sep; 45():1-11. PubMed ID: 26144598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Self-perceived outcomes of informative and apologetic self-disclosure: A mixed methods study.
    Young MM; Byrd CT; Gabel R
    J Commun Disord; 2023; 106():106387. PubMed ID: 37918083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.