BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

263 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17275988)

  • 1. Rebuttal from authors re: Edward M. Messing. Node positive renal cell cancer. Who can be helped? Eur Urol 2007;51:1477-8.
    Karakiewicz P; Perrotte P; Trinh QD; Patard JJ
    Eur Urol; 2007 Jun; 51(6):1478-80. PubMed ID: 17275988
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Node positive renal cell cancer. Who can be helped?
    Messing EM
    Eur Urol; 2007 Jun; 51(6):1477-8. PubMed ID: 17240037
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. High-dose interleukin-2 in metastatic renal cell carcinoma.
    Fernández-Rodríguez R; de Argumedo GL; Mañé JM; Muñoz A; Ferreiro J; Fuente N; López-Vivanco G
    J Clin Oncol; 2005 Sep; 23(27):6797-8; author reply 6798-9. PubMed ID: 16170190
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Rebuttal from authors re: Vincenzo Ficarra, Antonio Galfano and Stefano Cavalleri. Is simple enucleation a minimal partial nephrectomy responding to the EAU guidelines' recommendations? Eur Urol 2009;55:1315-8.
    Minervini A; Serni S; Di Cristofano C; Carini M
    Eur Urol; 2009 Jun; 55(6):1319-20. PubMed ID: 18804906
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Current clinical trials in renal cell carcinoma.
    Sokoloff MH; Daneshmand S; Ryan CW
    Urol Oncol; 2005; 23(4):289-92. PubMed ID: 16018946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Re: Puppo P, Introini C, Calvi P, Naselli A. Long term results of excision of small renal cancer surrounded by a minimal layer of grossly normal parenchyma: review of 94 cases. Eur Urol 2004;46:477-81.
    Carini M; Lapini A; Minervini A; Serni S
    Eur Urol; 2005 Feb; 47(2):265-6; author reply 266. PubMed ID: 15661426
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Re: Steiner T, Knels R, Schubert J. Prognostic significance of tumor size in patients after tumour nephrectomy for localised renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol 46;2004:327-30.
    Bogdanovic J
    Eur Urol; 2005 Feb; 47(2):266-7. PubMed ID: 15661427
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Current status of cytoreductive nephrectomy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma.
    Harshman LC; Srinivas S
    Expert Rev Anticancer Ther; 2007 Dec; 7(12):1749-61. PubMed ID: 18062749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Re: Ziya Kirkali and Hein van Poppel. A critical analysis of surgery for kidney cancer with vena cava invasion. Eur Urol 2007;52:658-62.
    Labanaris AP; Kühn R; Schott GE; Zugor V
    Eur Urol; 2007 Dec; 52(6):1800-1; author reply 1801-2. PubMed ID: 17888565
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Predicting cancer-control outcomes in patients with renal cell carcinoma.
    Karakiewicz PI; Hutterer GC
    Curr Opin Urol; 2007 Sep; 17(5):295-302. PubMed ID: 17762620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The role of cytoreductive nephrectomy in the era of molecular targeted therapy.
    Polcari AJ; Gorbonos A; Milner JE; Flanigan RC
    Int J Urol; 2009 Mar; 16(3):227-33. PubMed ID: 19207114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prognostic factors for renal cell carcinoma with tumor thrombus extension.
    Klatte T; Pantuck AJ; Riggs SB; Kleid MD; Shuch B; Zomorodian N; Kabbinavar FF; Belldegrun AS
    J Urol; 2007 Oct; 178(4 Pt 1):1189-95; discussion 1195. PubMed ID: 17698087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Re: Mesut Remzi, Michael Marberger. Renal tumor biopsies for evaluation of small renal tumors: why, in whom, and how? Eur urol 2009;55:359-67.
    Park BK
    Eur Urol; 2009 Jun; 55(6):e99-100; author reply e101-2. PubMed ID: 19286305
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Are we really making an advance in the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma?
    Kirkali Z
    Eur Urol; 2006 Apr; 49(4):604-5. PubMed ID: 16481098
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Re: outcome of stage T2 or greater renal cell cancer treated with partial nephrectomy: R. H. Breau, P. L. Crispen, R. E. Jimenez, C. M. Lohse, M. L. Blute and B. C. Leibovich J Urol 2010; 183: 903-908.
    Cimen HI; Canda AE; Balbay MD
    J Urol; 2010 Nov; 184(5):2212; author reply 2212-3. PubMed ID: 20864129
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Renal cell carcinoma: vena caval involvement.
    Boorjian SA; Sengupta S; Blute ML
    BJU Int; 2007 May; 99(5 Pt B):1239-44. PubMed ID: 17441917
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The role of pathology for clinical decision-making in renal cell carcinoma is increasing.
    Terrone C; Volpe A
    Eur Urol; 2007 May; 51(5):1166-8; discussion 1168-70. PubMed ID: 17257741
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Predictors of oncological outcome after resection of locally recurrent renal cell carcinoma.
    Margulis V; McDonald M; Tamboli P; Swanson DA; Wood CG
    J Urol; 2009 May; 181(5):2044-51. PubMed ID: 19286220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Editorial comment.
    Uzzo RG
    J Urol; 2009 Nov; 182(5):2171. PubMed ID: 19758642
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Lymph node dissection is not obsolete in clinically node-negative renal cell carcinoma patients.
    Van Poppel H
    Eur Urol; 2011 Jan; 59(1):24-5. PubMed ID: 20943309
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.