These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17276006)

  • 1. Choice of external criteria in back pain research: Does it matter? Recommendations based on analysis of responsiveness.
    Lauridsen HH; Hartvigsen J; Korsholm L; Grunnet-Nilsson N; Manniche C
    Pain; 2007 Sep; 131(1-2):112-20. PubMed ID: 17276006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Minimal clinically important change for pain intensity and disability in patients with nonspecific low back pain.
    Kovacs FM; Abraira V; Royuela A; Corcoll J; Alegre L; Cano A; Muriel A; Zamora J; del Real MT; Gestoso M; Mufraggi N
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Dec; 32(25):2915-20. PubMed ID: 18246018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Responsiveness and minimal clinically important change of the Pain Disability Index in patients with chronic back pain.
    Soer R; Reneman MF; Vroomen PC; Stegeman P; Coppes MH
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Apr; 37(8):711-5. PubMed ID: 21796022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire as an outcome measure: test-retest reliability and responsiveness to change.
    Strand LI; Ljunggren AE; Bogen B; Ask T; Johnsen TB
    Eur J Pain; 2008 Oct; 12(7):917-25. PubMed ID: 18289893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Responsiveness of visual analogue and McGill pain scale measures.
    Scrimshaw SV; Maher C
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2001 Oct; 24(8):501-4. PubMed ID: 11677548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Responsiveness and minimal clinically important difference for pain and disability instruments in low back pain patients.
    Lauridsen HH; Hartvigsen J; Manniche C; Korsholm L; Grunnet-Nilsson N
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2006 Oct; 7():82. PubMed ID: 17064410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale was responsive and showed reasonable interpretability after a multidisciplinary treatment.
    Demoulin C; Ostelo R; Knottnerus JA; Smeets RJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 Nov; 63(11):1249-55. PubMed ID: 20400266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The reliability of determining "leg dominant pain".
    Wai EK; Howse K; Pollock JW; Dornan H; Vexler L; Dagenais S
    Spine J; 2009 Jun; 9(6):447-53. PubMed ID: 19073373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prospective analysis of clinical evaluation and self-assessment by patients after decompression surgery for degenerative lumbar canal stenosis.
    Haro H; Maekawa S; Hamada Y
    Spine J; 2008; 8(2):380-4. PubMed ID: 17433781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Minimum clinically important difference in lumbar spine surgery patients: a choice of methods using the Oswestry Disability Index, Medical Outcomes Study questionnaire Short Form 36, and pain scales.
    Copay AG; Glassman SD; Subach BR; Berven S; Schuler TC; Carreon LY
    Spine J; 2008; 8(6):968-74. PubMed ID: 18201937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Defining patient-centered, multidimensional success criteria for treatment of chronic spine pain.
    Brown JL; Edwards PS; Atchison JW; Lafayette-Lucey A; Wittmer VT; Robinson ME
    Pain Med; 2008 Oct; 9(7):851-62. PubMed ID: 18950440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Improvement of back pain with operative and nonoperative treatment in adults with scoliosis.
    Smith JS; Shaffrey CI; Berven S; Glassman S; Hamill C; Horton W; Ondra S; Schwab F; Shainline M; Fu KM; Bridwell K;
    Neurosurgery; 2009 Jul; 65(1):86-93; discussion 93-4. PubMed ID: 19574829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Responsiveness and interpretability of the Portuguese version of the Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale in patients with chronic low back pain.
    Vieira AC; Moniz S; Fernandes R; Carnide F; Cruz EB
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Mar; 39(5):E346-52. PubMed ID: 24573078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The relative responsiveness of 3 different types of clinical outcome measures on chiropractic patients with low back pain.
    Hare-Mortensen L; Lauridsen H; Grunnet-Nilsson N
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2006 Feb; 29(2):95-9. PubMed ID: 16461167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Performance-based or self-report measures of physical function: which should be used in clinical trials of hip fracture patients?
    Latham NK; Mehta V; Nguyen AM; Jette AM; Olarsch S; Papanicolaou D; Chandler J
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2008 Nov; 89(11):2146-55. PubMed ID: 18996244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Responsiveness of pain and disability measures for chronic whiplash.
    Stewart M; Maher CG; Refshauge KM; Bogduk N; Nicholas M
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Mar; 32(5):580-5. PubMed ID: 17334294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Danish version of the Oswestry disability index for patients with low back pain. Part 2: Sensitivity, specificity and clinically significant improvement in two low back pain populations.
    Lauridsen HH; Hartvigsen J; Manniche C; Korsholm L; Grunnet-Nilsson N
    Eur Spine J; 2006 Nov; 15(11):1717-28. PubMed ID: 16736202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of responsiveness of Oswestry low back pain disability index.
    Changulani M; Shaju A
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2009 May; 129(5):691-4. PubMed ID: 18521617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Diagnostic utility of the McGill Pain Questionnaire and the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire for classification of low back pain syndromes.
    Haas M; Nyiendo J
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1992 Feb; 15(2):90-8. PubMed ID: 1532978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of outcome measures for use with back pain patients: results of a feasibility study.
    Triano JJ; McGregor M; Cramer GD; Emde DL
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1993 Feb; 16(2):67-73. PubMed ID: 8445356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.