244 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17276220)
1. Biomechanical comparison of 3 suture anchor configurations for repair of type II SLAP lesions.
Domb BG; Ehteshami JR; Shindle MK; Gulotta L; Zoghi-Moghadam M; MacGillivray JD; Altchek DW
Arthroscopy; 2007 Feb; 23(2):135-40. PubMed ID: 17276220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A biomechanical comparison of two suture anchor configurations for the repair of type II SLAP lesions subjected to a peel-back mechanism of failure.
Morgan RJ; Kuremsky MA; Peindl RD; Fleischli JE
Arthroscopy; 2008 Apr; 24(4):383-8. PubMed ID: 18375268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Strength of single- versus double-anchor repair of type II SLAP lesions: a cadaveric study.
Baldini T; Snyder RL; Peacher G; Bach J; McCarty E
Arthroscopy; 2009 Nov; 25(11):1257-60. PubMed ID: 19896047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Biomechanical comparison of knotless anchor repair versus simple suture repair for type II SLAP lesions.
Uggen C; Wei A; Glousman RE; ElAttrache N; Tibone JE; McGarry MH; Lee TQ
Arthroscopy; 2009 Oct; 25(10):1085-92. PubMed ID: 19801286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A biomechanical comparison of repair techniques in posterior type II superior labral anterior and posterior (SLAP) lesions.
Yoo JC; Ahn JH; Lee SH; Lim HC; Choi KW; Bae TS; Lee CY
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2008; 17(1):144-9. PubMed ID: 18069010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Restoration of labral anatomy and biomechanics after superior labral anterior-posterior repair: comparison of mattress versus simple technique.
Boddula MR; Adamson GJ; Gupta A; McGarry MH; Lee TQ
Am J Sports Med; 2012 Apr; 40(4):875-81. PubMed ID: 22302203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Biomechanical Comparison of Knotless All-Suture Anchors and Knotted All-Suture Anchors in Type II SLAP Lesions: A Cadaveric Study.
Nolte PC; Midtgaard KS; Ciccotti M; Miles JW; Tanghe KK; Lacheta L; Millett PJ
Arthroscopy; 2020 Aug; 36(8):2094-2102. PubMed ID: 32591261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cyclic load testing of biodegradable suture anchors containing 2 high-strength sutures.
Barber FA; Coons DA; Ruiz-Suarez M
Arthroscopy; 2007 Apr; 23(4):355-60. PubMed ID: 17418326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A biomechanical analysis of two biceps tenodesis fixation techniques.
Richards DP; Burkhart SS
Arthroscopy; 2005 Jul; 21(7):861-6. PubMed ID: 16012500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Rotator cuff repair: an ex vivo analysis of suture anchor repair techniques on initial load to failure.
Cummins CA; Appleyard RC; Strickland S; Haen PS; Chen S; Murrell GA
Arthroscopy; 2005 Oct; 21(10):1236-41. PubMed ID: 16226653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cyclic loading of rotator cuff reconstructions: single-row repair with modified suture configurations versus double-row repair.
Lorbach O; Bachelier F; Vees J; Kohn D; Pape D
Am J Sports Med; 2008 Aug; 36(8):1504-10. PubMed ID: 18296541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Biomechanical comparison of a knotless suture anchor with standard suture anchor in the repair of type II SLAP tears.
Sileo MJ; Lee SJ; Kremenic IJ; Orishimo K; Ben-Avi S; McHugh M; Nicholas SJ
Arthroscopy; 2009 Apr; 25(4):348-54. PubMed ID: 19341920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Footprint contact restoration between the biceps-labrum complex and the glenoid rim in SLAP repair: a comparative cadaveric study using pressure-sensitive film.
Kim SJ; Kim SH; Lee SK; Lee JH; Chun YM
Arthroscopy; 2013 Jun; 29(6):1005-11. PubMed ID: 23726107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Pullout strength of knotless suture anchors.
Leedle BP; Miller MD
Arthroscopy; 2005 Jan; 21(1):81-5. PubMed ID: 15650671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Triple-loaded single-anchor stitch configurations: an analysis of cyclically loaded suture-tendon interface security.
Coons DA; Barber FA; Herbert MA
Arthroscopy; 2006 Nov; 22(11):1154-8. PubMed ID: 17084289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Biomechanical evaluation of classic solid and novel all-soft suture anchors for glenoid labral repair.
Mazzocca AD; Chowaniec D; Cote MP; Fierra J; Apostolakos J; Nowak M; Arciero RA; Beitzel K
Arthroscopy; 2012 May; 28(5):642-8. PubMed ID: 22301360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effect on external rotation of an anchor placed anterior to the biceps in type 2 SLAP repairs in a cadaveric throwing model.
McCulloch PC; Andrews WJ; Alexander J; Brekke A; Duwani S; Noble P
Arthroscopy; 2013 Jan; 29(1):18-24. PubMed ID: 23177591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biomechanical advantages of triple-loaded suture anchors compared with double-row rotator cuff repairs.
Barber FA; Herbert MA; Schroeder FA; Aziz-Jacobo J; Mays MM; Rapley JH
Arthroscopy; 2010 Mar; 26(3):316-23. PubMed ID: 20206040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Biomechanical comparison of tibial eminence fracture fixation with high-strength suture, EndoButton, and suture anchor.
Hapa O; Barber FA; Süner G; Özden R; Davul S; Bozdağ E; Sünbüloğlu E
Arthroscopy; 2012 May; 28(5):681-7. PubMed ID: 22284410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Arthroscopic suture anchor capsulorrhaphy versus labral-based suture capsulorrhaphy in a cadaveric model.
Gillis RC; Donaldson CT; Kim H; Love JM; Dreese JC
Arthroscopy; 2012 Nov; 28(11):1615-21. PubMed ID: 22943847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
