453 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17276451)
1. Electrocardiographic reference ranges derived from 79,743 ambulatory subjects.
Mason JW; Ramseth DJ; Chanter DO; Moon TE; Goodman DB; Mendzelevski B
J Electrocardiol; 2007 Jul; 40(3):228-34. PubMed ID: 17276451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Electrocardiographic intervals in the healthy geriatric population--what are the "normals"?
Stead LG; Vaidyanathan L; Schears RM; Gilmore RM; Vedula KC; Behera SR; Bellolio MF; Gau GT; Decker WW
Am J Geriatr Cardiol; 2008; 17(2):87-91. PubMed ID: 18326954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of QTinno, a fully automated electrocardiographic analysis program, to semiautomated electrocardiographic analysis methods in a drug safety study in healthy subjects.
Sarapa N; Gussak I; Vajdic B; George S; Hadzievski L; Francom SF; Kowey P
J Electrocardiol; 2009; 42(4):358-66. PubMed ID: 19362316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of levetiracetam on cardiac repolarization in healthy subjects: a single-dose, randomized, placebo- and active-controlled, four-way crossover study.
Hulhoven R; Rosillon D; Bridson WE; Meeus MA; Salas E; Stockis A
Clin Ther; 2008 Feb; 30(2):260-70. PubMed ID: 18343264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Subject-specific heart rate dependency of electrocardiographic QT, PQ, and QRS intervals.
Malik M; Hnatkova K; Sisakova M; Schmidt G
J Electrocardiol; 2008; 41(6):491-7. PubMed ID: 18817925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Normal limits of the electrocardiogram derived from a large database of Brazilian primary care patients.
Palhares DMF; Marcolino MS; Santos TMM; da Silva JLP; Gomes PR; Ribeiro LB; Macfarlane PW; Ribeiro ALP
BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2017 Jun; 17(1):152. PubMed ID: 28610624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Differences between study-specific and subject-specific heart rate corrections of the QT interval in investigations of drug induced QTc prolongation.
Malik M; Hnatkova K; Batchvarov V
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2004 Jun; 27(6 Pt 1):791-800. PubMed ID: 15189536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Sex differences in the evolution of the electrocardiographic QT interval with age.
Rautaharju PM; Zhou SH; Wong S; Calhoun HP; Berenson GS; Prineas R; Davignon A
Can J Cardiol; 1992 Sep; 8(7):690-5. PubMed ID: 1422988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The electrocardiogram of the Beagle dog: reference values and effect of sex, genetic strain, body position and heart rate.
Hanton G; Rabemampianina Y
Lab Anim; 2006 Apr; 40(2):123-36. PubMed ID: 16600072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Features of an exceptionally narrow QRS data set.
Childers R; Holmes A; Kocherginsky M; Childers D; Pariser J
J Electrocardiol; 2008; 41(6):501-7. PubMed ID: 18822422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Normal electrocardiogram in the aged (the ILSA (Italian Longitudinal Study of Aging) Project)].
Bressan M; Bortolan G; Cavaggion C; Fusaro S
G Ital Cardiol; 1998 Jan; 28(1):22-8. PubMed ID: 9493042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Retrospective analysis of electrocardiographic changes after administration of oral or intravenous garenoxacin in five phase I, placebo-controlled studies in healthy volunteers.
Wang Z; Grasela DM; Krishna G
Clin Ther; 2007 Jun; 29(6):1098-106. PubMed ID: 17692724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Ethnic differences in electrocardiographic intervals and axes.
Mansi IA; Nash IS
J Electrocardiol; 2001 Oct; 34(4):303-7. PubMed ID: 11590557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Normal limits for heart rate as established using 24-hour ambulatory electrocardiography in children and adolescents.
Salameh A; Gebauer RA; Grollmuss O; Vít P; Reich O; Janousek J
Cardiol Young; 2008 Oct; 18(5):467-72. PubMed ID: 18634710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Electrical axis of the heart in healthy adult Nigerians.
Araoye MA
Afr J Med Med Sci; 1984; 13(1-2):85-91. PubMed ID: 6087644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Normal values of the electrocardiogram for ages 16-90 years.
Rijnbeek PR; van Herpen G; Bots ML; Man S; Verweij N; Hofman A; Hillege H; Numans ME; Swenne CA; Witteman JC; Kors JA
J Electrocardiol; 2014; 47(6):914-21. PubMed ID: 25194872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. New quantitative methods for evaluation of dynamic changes in QT interval on 24 hour Holter ECG recordings: QT interval in idiopathic ventricular fibrillation and long QT syndrome.
Sugao M; Fujiki A; Sakabe M; Nishida K; Tsuneda T; Iwamoto J; Mizumaki K; Inoue H
Heart; 2006 Feb; 92(2):201-7. PubMed ID: 15908480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Differences between QT and RR intervals in digital and digitized paper electrocardiograms: contribution of the printer, scanner, and digitization process.
Hingorani P; Karnad DR; Panicker GK; Deshmukh S; Kothari S; Narula D
J Electrocardiol; 2008; 41(5):370-5. PubMed ID: 18482732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Simultaneous assessment of electrocardiographic parameters for risk stratification: validation in healthy subjects.
Michelucci A; Mortara D; Lazzeri C; Barletta G; Capalbo A; Badia T; Del Bene R; Bano C; Gensini GF; Franchi F
Ital Heart J; 2002 May; 3(5):308-17. PubMed ID: 12066563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Electrocardiographic findings in a school-age population using a computerized system: calculation of standard norms for heart rate and PR, QRS, and QT intervals].
Adinolfi L; Montano A; Golia B; Napolano S; Chiacchio T; Marino P; Condorelli M
G Ital Cardiol; 1989 Feb; 19(2):145-52. PubMed ID: 2759395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
