These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
561 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17276491)
1. Recommendations for the reporting of pleural mesothelioma. Butnor KJ; Sporn TA; Ordonez NG; Hum Pathol; 2007 Nov; 38(11):1587-9. PubMed ID: 17276491 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Recommendations for the reporting of prostate carcinoma. Epstein JI; Srigley J; Grignon D; Humphrey P; Hum Pathol; 2007 Sep; 38(9):1305-9. PubMed ID: 17707261 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Recommendations for the reporting of gastric carcinoma. Robert ME; Lamps L; Lauwers GY; Hum Pathol; 2008 Jan; 39(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 17967475 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Usefulness of a synoptic data tool for reporting of head and neck neoplasms based on the College of American Pathologists cancer checklists. Kang HP; Devine LJ; Piccoli AL; Seethala RR; Amin W; Parwani AV Am J Clin Pathol; 2009 Oct; 132(4):521-30. PubMed ID: 19762529 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Synoptic tool for reporting of hematological and lymphoid neoplasms based on World Health Organization classification and College of American Pathologists checklist. Mohanty SK; Piccoli AL; Devine LJ; Patel AA; William GC; Winters SB; Becich MJ; Parwani AV BMC Cancer; 2007 Jul; 7():144. PubMed ID: 17672904 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Electronic capture and communication of synoptic cancer data elements from pathology reports: results of the Reporting Pathology Protocols 2 (RPP2) project. Hassell L; Aldinger W; Moody C; Winters S; Gerlach K; Schwenn M; Perriello D J Registry Manag; 2009; 36(4):117-24; quiz 163-5. PubMed ID: 20795553 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Synoptic reporting in tumor pathology: advantages of a web-based system. Qu Z; Ninan S; Almosa A; Chang KG; Kuruvilla S; Nguyen N Am J Clin Pathol; 2007 Jun; 127(6):898-903. PubMed ID: 17509987 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinically relevant breast cancer reporting: using process measures to improve anatomic pathology reporting. Hammond EH; Flinner RL Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1997 Nov; 121(11):1171-5. PubMed ID: 9372744 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Detecting and preventing the occurrence of errors in the practices of laboratory medicine and anatomic pathology: 15 years' experience with the College of American Pathologists' Q-PROBES and Q-TRACKS programs. Novis DA Clin Lab Med; 2004 Dec; 24(4):965-78. PubMed ID: 15555751 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Protocol for the examination of specimens removed from patients with gastric carcinoma: a basis for checklists. Members of the Cancer Committee, College of American Pathologists, and the Task Force for Protocols on the Examination of Specimens From Patients With Gastric Cancer. Compton C; Sobin LH Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1998 Jan; 122(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 9448011 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Standards, options and recommendations for the composition of anatomic and surgical pathology reports or cytopathology reports in oncology]. Arnould L; Fiche M; Blanc-Vincent MP; Le Doussal V; Signal-Zafrani B; Gory-Delaboere G; Briffod M; Vielh P; Voigt JJ; Ann Pathol; 2003 Feb; 23(1):79-95. PubMed ID: 12743509 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. What is needed to satisfy the American College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer (COC) requirements for the pathologic reporting of cancer specimens? Connolly JL; Fletcher CD Hum Pathol; 2003 Feb; 34(2):111. PubMed ID: 12612876 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Standardization of the surgical pathology report: formats, templates, and synoptic reports. Leslie KO; Rosai J Semin Diagn Pathol; 1994 Nov; 11(4):253-7. PubMed ID: 7878300 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Standards, Options and Recommendations (SOR) for drafting of anatomic and surgical pathology reports or cytopathology reports in oncology]. Arnould L; Fiche M; Blanc-Vincent MP; Le Doussal V; Zafrani B; Gory-Delabaere G; Briffod M; Vielh P; Voigt JJ Bull Cancer; 2000 Feb; 87(2):159-71. PubMed ID: 10705287 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Recommendations for the reporting of resected large intestinal carcinomas. Association of Directors of Anatomic and Surgical Pathology. Am J Clin Pathol; 1996 Jul; 106(1):12-5. PubMed ID: 8701921 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cancer biomarkers: the role of structured data reporting. Simpson RW; Berman MA; Foulis PR; Divaris DX; Birdsong GG; Mirza J; Moldwin R; Spencer S; Srigley JR; Fitzgibbons PL Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2015 May; 139(5):587-93. PubMed ID: 25275812 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Protocol for the examination of specimens from patients with carcinoma of the ampulla of Vater: a basis for checklists. Cancer Committee, College of American Pathologists. Compton CC Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1997 Jul; 121(7):673-7. PubMed ID: 9240900 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Standardized synoptic cancer pathology reporting: a population-based approach. Srigley JR; McGowan T; Maclean A; Raby M; Ross J; Kramer S; Sawka C J Surg Oncol; 2009 Jun; 99(8):517-24. PubMed ID: 19466743 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Adequacy of surgical pathology reporting of cancer: a College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of 86 institutions. Idowu MO; Bekeris LG; Raab S; Ruby SG; Nakhleh RE Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2010 Jul; 134(7):969-74. PubMed ID: 20586623 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. What impact has the introduction of a synoptic report for rectal cancer had on reporting outcomes for specialist gastrointestinal and nongastrointestinal pathologists? Messenger DE; McLeod RS; Kirsch R Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2011 Nov; 135(11):1471-5. PubMed ID: 22032575 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]