304 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17276871)
21. Pendulum appliances with 2 anchorage designs: conventional anchorage vs bone anchorage.
Polat-Ozsoy O; Kircelli BH; Arman-Ozçirpici A; Pektaş ZO; Uçkan S
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Mar; 133(3):339.e9-339.e17. PubMed ID: 18331928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. An implant to eliminate anchorage loss during molar distalization: a case report involving the Graz implant-supported pendulum.
Byloff FK; Kärcher H; Clar E; Stoff F
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 2000; 15(2):129-37. PubMed ID: 11307423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Effects of zygoma-gear appliance for unilateral maxillary molar distalization: A prospective clinical study.
Kilkis D; Celikoglu M; Nur M; Bayram M; Candirli C
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Dec; 150(6):989-996. PubMed ID: 27894548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Distal molar movement using the pendulum appliance. Part 1: Clinical and radiological evaluation.
Byloff FK; Darendeliler MA
Angle Orthod; 1997; 67(4):249-60. PubMed ID: 9267573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Asymmetrical distalization of maxillary molars with zygomatic anchorage, improved superelastic nickel-titanium alloy wires, and open-coil springs.
Ishida T; Yoon HS; Ono T
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Oct; 144(4):583-93. PubMed ID: 24075667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Development of a new device for maxillary molar distalization with high pseudoelastic forces to overcome slider friction: the Longslider--a modification of the Beneslider.
Longerich UJ; Thurau M; Kolk A
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2014 Jul; 118(1):22-34. PubMed ID: 23183028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Retrospective comparison of two different miniscrew-supported molar distalization methods applied in the buccal and palatal regions.
Aslan YS; Yavan MA; Hamamci N
J World Fed Orthod; 2024 Jun; 13(3):145-152. PubMed ID: 38522972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Skeletal versus conventional intraoral anchorage for the treatment of class II malocclusion: dentoalveolar and skeletal effects.
Mariani L; Maino G; Caprioglio A
Prog Orthod; 2014; 15(1):43. PubMed ID: 25138818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Efficiency of the skeletonized Pendulum K appliance for non-compliance maxillary molar distalization : A clinical pilot study.
Kinzinger GSM; Hourfar J; Lisson JA
J Orofac Orthop; 2021 Nov; 82(6):391-402. PubMed ID: 33651171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparison of 2 distalization systems supported by intraosseous screws.
Gelgor IE; Karaman AI; Buyukyilmaz T
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Feb; 131(2):161.e1-8. PubMed ID: 17276855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Bodily distalization of molars with absolute anchorage.
Keles A; Erverdi N; Sezen S
Angle Orthod; 2003 Aug; 73(4):471-82. PubMed ID: 12940570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparison of rate of canine retraction with conventional molar anchorage and titanium implant anchorage.
Thiruvenkatachari B; Ammayappan P; Kandaswamy R
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jul; 134(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 18617100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Maxillary molar distalization: Pendulum and Fast-Back, comparison between two approaches for Class II malocclusion.
Caprioglio A; Beretta M; Lanteri C
Prog Orthod; 2011; 12(1):8-16. PubMed ID: 21515227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Distalization of maxillary molars using a lever arm and mini-implant.
Gurgel Jde A; Pinzan-Vercelino CR; Bramante FS; Rivera AP
Orthodontics (Chic.); 2013; 14(1):e140-9. PubMed ID: 23646324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A comparison of two intraoral molar distalization appliances: distal jet versus pendulum.
Chiu PP; McNamara JA; Franchi L
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Sep; 128(3):353-65. PubMed ID: 16168332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Maxillary molar distalization or mandibular enhancement: a cephalometric comparison of comprehensive orthodontic treatment including the pendulum and the Herbst appliances.
Burkhardt DR; McNamara JA; Baccetti T
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Feb; 123(2):108-16. PubMed ID: 12594414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. An evaluation of intraoral molar distalization with nickel-titanium coil springs.
Oztürk Y; Firatli S; Almaç L
Quintessence Int; 2005 Oct; 36(9):731-5. PubMed ID: 16163876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Midpalatal implants vs headgear for orthodontic anchorage--a randomized clinical trial: cephalometric results.
Benson PE; Tinsley D; O'Dwyer JJ; Majumdar A; Doyle P; Sandler PJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Nov; 132(5):606-15. PubMed ID: 18005834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Intramaxillary and intermaxillary absolute anchorage with an endosseous dental implant and rare-earth magnets.
Uribe F; Nanda R
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):124-33. PubMed ID: 19577159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Distalization of the mandibular dentition with mini-implants to correct a Class III malocclusion with a midline deviation.
Chung KR; Kim SH; Choo H; Kook YA; Cope JB
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Jan; 137(1):135-46. PubMed ID: 20122441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
