345 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17278486)
1. Development of a computer-aided diagnostic scheme for detection of interval changes in successive whole-body bone scans.
Shiraishi J; Li Q; Appelbaum D; Pu Y; Doi K
Med Phys; 2007 Jan; 34(1):25-36. PubMed ID: 17278486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical utility of temporal subtraction images in successive whole-body bone scans: evaluation in a prospective clinical study.
Shiraishi J; Appelbaum D; Pu Y; Engelmann R; Li Q; Doi K
J Digit Imaging; 2011 Aug; 24(4):680-7. PubMed ID: 20730471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Computer-assisted interpretation of planar whole-body bone scans.
Sadik M; Hamadeh I; Nordblom P; Suurkula M; Höglund P; Ohlsson M; Edenbrandt L
J Nucl Med; 2008 Dec; 49(12):1958-65. PubMed ID: 18997038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Computer-aided diagnosis and artificial intelligence in clinical imaging.
Shiraishi J; Li Q; Appelbaum D; Doi K
Semin Nucl Med; 2011 Nov; 41(6):449-62. PubMed ID: 21978447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Usefulness of temporal subtraction images for identification of interval changes in successive whole-body bone scans: JAFROC analysis of radiologists' performance.
Shiraishi J; Appelbaum D; Pu Y; Li Q; Pesce L; Doi K
Acad Radiol; 2007 Aug; 14(8):959-66. PubMed ID: 17659242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of image enhancement methods for the effective diagnosis in successive whole-body bone scans.
Jeong CB; Kim KG; Kim TS; Kim SK
J Digit Imaging; 2011 Jun; 24(3):424-36. PubMed ID: 20195695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Bone tumor segmentation on bone scans using context information and random forests.
Chu G; Lo P; Ramakrishna B; Kim H; Morris D; Goldin J; Brown M
Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2014; 17(Pt 1):601-8. PubMed ID: 25333168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A new computer-based decision-support system for the interpretation of bone scans.
Sadik M; Jakobsson D; Olofsson F; Ohlsson M; Suurkula M; Edenbrandt L
Nucl Med Commun; 2006 May; 27(5):417-23. PubMed ID: 16609352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Statistical regularization of deformation fields for atlas-based segmentation of bone scintigraphy images.
Sjöstrand K; Ohlsson M; Edenbrandt L
Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2009; 12(Pt 1):664-71. PubMed ID: 20426045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Gait recognition with shifted energy image and structural feature extraction.
Huang X; Boulgouris NV
IEEE Trans Image Process; 2012 Apr; 21(4):2256-68. PubMed ID: 22194243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A method to test the reproducibility and to improve performance of computer-aided detection schemes for digitized mammograms.
Zheng B; Gur D; Good WF; Hardesty LA
Med Phys; 2004 Nov; 31(11):2964-72. PubMed ID: 15587648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and SPECT/low-dose computerized tomography did not increase sensitivity or specificity compared to planar bone scintigraphy for detection of bone metastases in advanced breast cancer.
Haraldsen A; Bluhme H; Røhl L; Pedersen EM; Jensen AB; Hansen EB; Nellemann H; Rasmussen F; Morsing A
Clin Physiol Funct Imaging; 2016 Jan; 36(1):40-6. PubMed ID: 25257661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. SPECT imaging in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: automated detection of match and mismatch defects by means of image-processing techniques.
Reinartz P; Kaiser HJ; Wildberger JE; Gordji C; Nowak B; Buell U
J Nucl Med; 2006 Jun; 47(6):968-73. PubMed ID: 16741306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Multiview-based computer-aided detection scheme for breast masses.
Zheng B; Leader JK; Abrams GS; Lu AH; Wallace LP; Maitz GS; Gur D
Med Phys; 2006 Sep; 33(9):3135-43. PubMed ID: 17022205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Improved classifications of planar whole-body bone scans using a computer-assisted diagnosis system: a multicenter, multiple-reader, multiple-case study.
Sadik M; Suurkula M; Höglund P; Järund A; Edenbrandt L
J Nucl Med; 2009 Mar; 50(3):368-75. PubMed ID: 19223423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Investigation of computer-aided diagnosis system for bone scans: a retrospective analysis in 406 patients.
Tokuda O; Harada Y; Ohishi Y; Matsunaga N; Edenbrandt L
Ann Nucl Med; 2014 May; 28(4):329-39. PubMed ID: 24573796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Automated chest wall line detection for whole-breast segmentation in sagittal breast MR images.
Wu S; Weinstein SP; Conant EF; Schnall MD; Kontos D
Med Phys; 2013 Apr; 40(4):042301. PubMed ID: 23556914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Computerized interpretation of breast MRI: investigation of enhancement-variance dynamics.
Chen W; Giger ML; Lan L; Bick U
Med Phys; 2004 May; 31(5):1076-82. PubMed ID: 15191295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Temporal subtraction in chest radiography: automated assessment of registration accuracy.
Armato SG; Doshi DJ; Engelmann R; Croteau CL; MacMahon H
Med Phys; 2006 May; 33(5):1239-49. PubMed ID: 16752558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Computer-aided detection of multiple sclerosis lesions in brain magnetic resonance images: False positive reduction scheme consisted of rule-based, level set method, and support vector machine.
Yamamoto D; Arimura H; Kakeda S; Magome T; Yamashita Y; Toyofuku F; Ohki M; Higashida Y; Korogi Y
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2010 Jul; 34(5):404-13. PubMed ID: 20189353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
