196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17278506)
1. Evaluation of clinical margins via simulation of patient setup errors in prostate IMRT treatment plans.
Gordon JJ; Crimaldi AJ; Hagan M; Moore J; Siebers JV
Med Phys; 2007 Jan; 34(1):202-14. PubMed ID: 17278506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of dosimetric margins in prostate IMRT treatment plans.
Gordon JJ; Siebers JV
Med Phys; 2008 Feb; 35(2):569-75. PubMed ID: 18383678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of patient setup errors on simultaneously integrated boost head and neck IMRT treatment plans.
Siebers JV; Keall PJ; Wu Q; Williamson JF; Schmidt-Ullrich RK
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Oct; 63(2):422-33. PubMed ID: 16168835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Coverage optimized planning: probabilistic treatment planning based on dose coverage histogram criteria.
Gordon JJ; Sayah N; Weiss E; Siebers JV
Med Phys; 2010 Feb; 37(2):550-63. PubMed ID: 20229863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Convolution method and CTV-to-PTV margins for finite fractions and small systematic errors.
Gordon JJ; Siebers JV
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Apr; 52(7):1967-90. PubMed ID: 17374922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dosimetric consequences of rotational setup errors with direct simulation in a treatment planning system for fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy.
Peng JL; Liu C; Chen Y; Amdur RJ; Vanek K; Li JG
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2011 Apr; 12(3):3422. PubMed ID: 21844852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A new method of incorporating systematic uncertainties in intensity-modulated radiotherapy optimization.
Yang J; Mageras GS; Spirou SV; Jackson A; Yorke E; Ling CC; Chui CS
Med Phys; 2005 Aug; 32(8):2567-79. PubMed ID: 16193787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Quantifying the effect of intrafraction motion during breast IMRT planning and dose delivery.
George R; Keall PJ; Kini VR; Vedam SS; Siebers JV; Wu Q; Lauterbach MH; Arthur DW; Mohan R
Med Phys; 2003 Apr; 30(4):552-62. PubMed ID: 12722807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparisons of treatment optimization directly incorporating random patient setup uncertainty with a margin-based approach.
Moore JA; Gordon JJ; Anscher MS; Siebers JV
Med Phys; 2009 Sep; 36(9):3880-90. PubMed ID: 19810460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dosimetric effects of patient rotational setup errors on prostate IMRT treatments.
Fu W; Yang Y; Li X; Heron DE; Huq MS; Yue NJ
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Oct; 51(20):5321-31. PubMed ID: 17019041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dosimetric influences of rotational setup errors on head and neck carcinoma intensity-modulated radiation therapy treatments.
Fu W; Yang Y; Yue NJ; Heron DE; Saiful Huq M
Med Dosim; 2013; 38(2):125-32. PubMed ID: 23266161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The use of spatial dose gradients and probability density function to evaluate the effect of internal organ motion for prostate IMRT treatment planning.
Jiang R; Barnett RB; Chow JC; Chen JZ
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Mar; 52(5):1469-84. PubMed ID: 17301465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Adequate margins for random setup uncertainties in head-and-neck IMRT.
Astreinidou E; Bel A; Raaijmakers CP; Terhaard CH; Lagendijk JJ
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Mar; 61(3):938-44. PubMed ID: 15708278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A study of image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy with fiducials for localized prostate cancer including pelvic lymph nodes.
Hsu A; Pawlicki T; Luxton G; Hara W; King CR
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2007 Jul; 68(3):898-902. PubMed ID: 17459610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A numerical simulation of organ motion and daily setup uncertainties: implications for radiation therapy.
Killoran JH; Kooy HM; Gladstone DJ; Welte FJ; Beard CJ
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1997 Jan; 37(1):213-21. PubMed ID: 9054898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Analysis of interfractional set-up errors and intrafractional organ motions during IMRT for head and neck tumors to define an appropriate planning target volume (PTV)- and planning organs at risk volume (PRV)-margins.
Suzuki M; Nishimura Y; Nakamatsu K; Okumura M; Hashiba H; Koike R; Kanamori S; Shibata T
Radiother Oncol; 2006 Mar; 78(3):283-90. PubMed ID: 16564594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparisons of treatment optimization directly incorporating systematic patient setup uncertainty with a margin-based approach.
Moore JA; Gordon JJ; Anscher M; Silva J; Siebers JV
Med Phys; 2012 Feb; 39(2):1102-11. PubMed ID: 22320820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dosimetric assessment of rigid setup error by CBCT for HN-IMRT.
Worthy D; Wu Q
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2010 May; 11(3):3187. PubMed ID: 20717085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dosimetric and radiobiological impact of dose fractionation on respiratory motion induced IMRT delivery errors: a volumetric dose measurement study.
Duan J; Shen S; Fiveash JB; Popple RA; Brezovich IA
Med Phys; 2006 May; 33(5):1380-7. PubMed ID: 16752574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A general method for the definition of margin recipes depending on the treatment technique applied in helical tomotherapy prostate plans.
Sevillano D; Mínguez C; Sánchez A; Sánchez-Reyes A
Phys Med; 2016 Jan; 32(1):116-22. PubMed ID: 26585538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
