These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

83 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17278627)

  • 1. Clinical evaluation of total-etch and self-etch bonding systems for preventing sensitivity in Class 1 and Class 2 restorations.
    Perry RD
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2007 Jan; 28(1):12-4. PubMed ID: 17278627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. One-year clinical evaluation of an ethanol-based and a solvent-free dentin adhesive.
    Aw TC; Lepe X; Johnson GH; Mancl L
    Am J Dent; 2004 Dec; 17(6):451-6. PubMed ID: 15724760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of adhesive and flowable composite on postoperative sensitivity: 2-week results.
    Perdigão J; Anauate-Netto C; Carmo AR; Hodges JS; Cordeiro HJ; Lewgoy HR; Dutra-Corrêa M; Castilhos N; Amore R
    Quintessence Int; 2004; 35(10):777-84. PubMed ID: 15553285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical performance of Class II adhesive restorations in pulpectomized primary molars: 12-month results.
    Zulfikaroglu BT; Atac AS; Cehreli ZC
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2008; 75(1):33-43. PubMed ID: 18505646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. 36-month clinical evaluation of two adhesives and microhybrid resin composites in Class I restorations.
    Swift EJ; Ritter AV; Heymann HO; Sturdevant JR; Wilder AD
    Am J Dent; 2008 Jun; 21(3):148-52. PubMed ID: 18686764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A randomized controlled clinical trial of a HEMA-free all-in-one adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions at 1 year.
    Van Landuyt KL; Peumans M; Fieuws S; De Munck J; Cardoso MV; Ermis RB; Lambrechts P; Van Meerbeek B
    J Dent; 2008 Oct; 36(10):847-55. PubMed ID: 18656295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Postoperative sensitivity of self etch versus total etch adhesive.
    Yousaf A; Aman N; Manzoor MA; Shah JA; Dilrasheed
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2014 Jun; 24(6):383-6. PubMed ID: 24953909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical evaluation of two adhesive composite cements for the suppression of dentinal cold sensitivity.
    Sensat ML; Brackett WW; Meinberg TA; Beatty MW
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Jul; 88(1):50-3. PubMed ID: 12239480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Correlation between dental arch location and clinical success rate of total etch and self-etch adhesives in ClassV composite restorations.
    Ghavamnasiri M; Ameri H; Chasteen JE; Mofrad AH; Hashemi B
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2012 Mar; 20(1):26-30. PubMed ID: 22474933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Self-etching adhesives and postoperative sensitivity.
    Unemori M; Matsuya Y; Akashi A; Goto Y; Akamine A
    Am J Dent; 2004 Jun; 17(3):191-5. PubMed ID: 15301216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical evaluation of a resin-based desensitizing agent and a self-etching adhesive on the reduction of postoperative sensitivity of amalgam restorations.
    Hajizadeh H; Akbari M; Ghavamnasiri M; Abedini S
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Nov; 9(7):9-16. PubMed ID: 18997911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical evaluation of a one-bottle bonding system for desensitizing exposed roots.
    Ferrari M; Cagidiaco MC; Kugel G; Davidson CL
    Am J Dent; 1999 Oct; 12(5):243-9. PubMed ID: 10649916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical evaluation of self-etch adhesives in Class V non-carious lesions.
    Abdalla AI; García-Godoy F
    Am J Dent; 2006 Oct; 19(5):289-92. PubMed ID: 17073206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Indirect pulp treatment: in vivo outcomes of an adhesive resin system vs calcium hydroxide for protection of the dentin-pulp complex.
    Falster CA; Araujo FB; Straffon LH; Nör JE
    Pediatr Dent; 2002; 24(3):241-8. PubMed ID: 12064499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Three-year clinical effectiveness of a two-step self-etch adhesive in cervical lesions.
    Peumans M; Munck J; Van Landuyt K; Lambrechts P; Van Meerbeek B
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2005 Dec; 113(6):512-8. PubMed ID: 16324142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An 18-months' evaluation of self-etch and etch & rinse adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions.
    Dalton Bittencourt D; Ezecelevski IG; Reis A; Van Dijken JW; Loguercio AD
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2005 Jun; 63(3):173-8. PubMed ID: 16191912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Survival of self-etch adhesive Class II composite restorations using ART and conventional cavity preparations in primary molars.
    Eden E; Topaloglu-Ak A; Frencken JE; van't Hof M
    Am J Dent; 2006 Dec; 19(6):359-63. PubMed ID: 17212078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A three-year clinical evaluation of two-bottle versus one-bottle dentin adhesives.
    Aw TC; Lepe X; Johnson GH; Mancl LA
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2005 Mar; 136(3):311-22. PubMed ID: 15819344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of Surface Sealant Reapplication on Clinical Performance of HEMA-containing and HEMA-free Self-etch Adhesives: Two-year Results.
    Tekçe N; Demirci M; Tuncer S; Göktürk SA
    Oper Dent; 2018; 43(5):488-500. PubMed ID: 29782221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of different liner treatments on postoperative sensitivity of amalgam restorations.
    Gordan VV; Mjör IA; Hucke RD; Smith GE
    Quintessence Int; 1999 Jan; 30(1):55-9. PubMed ID: 10323159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.