147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17279450)
1. Women's preferences for the provision of emergency hormonal contraception services.
Seston EM; Elliott RA; Noyce PR; Payne K
Pharm World Sci; 2007 Jun; 29(3):183-9. PubMed ID: 17279450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Emergency hormonal contraception usage in genitourinary medicine clinic attenders.
Evans JK; Holmes A; Browning M; Forster GE
Genitourin Med; 1996 Jun; 72(3):217-9. PubMed ID: 8707328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Emergency hormonal contraceptive service provision via community pharmacies in the UK: a systematic review of pharmacists' and young women's views, perspectives and experiences.
Chirewa B; Wakhisi A
Perspect Public Health; 2020 Mar; 140(2):108-116. PubMed ID: 31402746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Canadian Contraception Consensus (Part 2 of 4).
Black A; Guilbert E; ; Costescu D; Dunn S; Fisher W; Kives S; Mirosh M; Norman WV; Pymar H; Reid R; Roy G; Varto H; Waddington A; Wagner MS; Whelan AM; ; Ferguson C; Fortin C; Kielly M; Mansouri S; Todd N
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2015 Nov; 37(11):1033-9. PubMed ID: 26629725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Women's colposcopy experience and preferences: a mixed methods study.
Swancutt DR; Greenfield SM; Wilson S
BMC Womens Health; 2008 Jan; 8():2. PubMed ID: 18194523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Provision of emergency contraception: a pilot study comparing access through pharmacies and clinical settings.
Black KI; Mercer CH; Kubba A; Wellings K
Contraception; 2008 Mar; 77(3):181-5. PubMed ID: 18279688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Models of intrapartum care and women's trade-offs in remote and rural Scotland: a mixed-methods study.
Pitchforth E; Watson V; Tucker J; Ryan M; van Teijlingen E; Farmer J; Ireland J; Thomson E; Kiger A; Bryers H
BJOG; 2008 Apr; 115(5):560-9. PubMed ID: 17903223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Canadian Contraception Consensus (Part 1 of 4).
Black A; Guilbert E; ; Costescu D; Dunn S; Fisher W; Kives S; Mirosh M; Norman WV; Pymar H; Reid R; Roy G; Varto H; Waddington A; Wagner MS; Whelan AM; ; Ferguson C; Fortin C; Kielly M; Mansouri S; Todd N;
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2015 Oct; 37(10):936-42. PubMed ID: 26606712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Randomised preference trial of medical versus surgical termination of pregnancy less than 14 weeks' gestation (TOPS).
Robson SC; Kelly T; Howel D; Deverill M; Hewison J; Lie ML; Stamp E; Armstrong N; May CR
Health Technol Assess; 2009 Nov; 13(53):1-124, iii-iv. PubMed ID: 19906334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Women's health: potential for better coordination of services.
Queen HF; Ward H; Smith C; Woodroffe C
Genitourin Med; 1991 Jun; 67(3):215-9. PubMed ID: 2071123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Access to emergency hormonal contraception from community pharmacies and family planning clinics.
Lewington G; Marshall K
Br J Clin Pharmacol; 2006 May; 61(5):605-8. PubMed ID: 16669854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Women's knowledge of taking oral contraceptive pills correctly and of emergency contraception: effect of providing information leaflets in general practice.
Smith LF; Whitfield MJ
Br J Gen Pract; 1995 Aug; 45(397):409-14. PubMed ID: 7576845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Preferences for centralised emergency medical services: discrete choice experiment.
Bhattarai N; Mcmeekin P; Price CI; Vale L
BMJ Open; 2019 Nov; 9(11):e030966. PubMed ID: 31694847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Women's preferences for attributes of first-trimester miscarriage management: a stated preference discrete-choice experiment.
Petrou S; McIntosh E
Value Health; 2009 Jun; 12(4):551-9. PubMed ID: 18798807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Family planning in genitourinary medicine: an opportunistic service?
Masters L; Nicholas H; Bunting P; Welch J
Genitourin Med; 1995 Apr; 71(2):103-5. PubMed ID: 7744398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Exploring women's preferences for birth settings in England: A discrete choice experiment.
Fletcher BR; Rowe R; Hollowell J; Scanlon M; Hinton L; Rivero-Arias O
PLoS One; 2019; 14(4):e0215098. PubMed ID: 30973919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Choices and services related to contraception in the Gaza strip, Palestine: perceptions of service users and providers.
Böttcher B; Abu-El-Noor M; Abu-El-Noor N
BMC Womens Health; 2019 Dec; 19(1):165. PubMed ID: 31856794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Are women's expectations and preferences for intrapartum care affected by the model of care on offer?
Hundley V; Ryan M
BJOG; 2004 Jun; 111(6):550-60. PubMed ID: 15198782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Eliciting women's preferences for place of child birth at a peri-urban setting in Nairobi, Kenya: A discrete choice experiment.
Oluoch-Aridi J; Adam MB; Wafula F; K'okwaro G
PLoS One; 2020; 15(12):e0242149. PubMed ID: 33301447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Factors influencing women's preferences for subsequent management in the event of incomplete evacuation of the uterus after misoprostol treatment for miscarriage.
Hentzen JEKR; Verschoor MA; Lemmers M; Ankum WM; Mol BWJ; van Wely M
Hum Reprod; 2017 Aug; 32(8):1674-1683. PubMed ID: 28575402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
