These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17279450)

  • 21. Preferences of patients for emergency services available during usual GP surgery hours: a discrete choice experiment.
    Gerard K; Lattimer V
    Fam Pract; 2005 Feb; 22(1):28-36. PubMed ID: 15528284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Preferences for a third-trimester ultrasound scan in a low-risk obstetric population: a discrete choice experiment.
    Lynn FA; Crealey GE; Alderdice FA; McElnay JC
    Health Expect; 2015 Oct; 18(5):892-903. PubMed ID: 23527851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Teenage pregnancy: a comparative study of teenagers choosing termination of pregnancy or antenatal care.
    Pearson VA; Owen MR; Phillips DR; Gray DJ; Marshall MN
    J R Soc Med; 1995 Jul; 88(7):384-8. PubMed ID: 7562806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Women's preferences for less active ectopic pregnancy treatment: A discrete choice experiment.
    Capmas P; Panjo H; Artignan J; Babelhadj A; Benoist I; Decouzon J; Jarrige C; Leglise M; Renoncet V; Pelletier-Fleury N
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2024 Jan; 292():175-181. PubMed ID: 38035866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Provision of emergency contraception in general practice and confidentiality for the under 16's: results of a postal survey by general practitioners in Avon.
    Graham A; Moore L; Sharp D
    J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care; 2001 Oct; 27(4):193-6. PubMed ID: 12457466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison of medical abortion with surgical vacuum aspiration: women's preferences and acceptability of treatment.
    Henshaw RC; Naji SA; Russell IT; Templeton AA
    BMJ; 1993 Sep; 307(6906):714-7. PubMed ID: 8401094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Reviewing emergency care systems 2: measuring patient preferences using a discrete choice experiment.
    Gerard K; Lattimer V; Turnbull J; Smith H; George S; Brailsford S; Maslin-Prothero S
    Emerg Med J; 2004 Nov; 21(6):692-7. PubMed ID: 15496695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Provision of emergency hormonal contraception through community pharmacies in a rural area.
    Lloyd K; Gale E
    J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care; 2005 Oct; 31(4):297-300. PubMed ID: 16274553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Dual provision or duplication? A survey of family planning provision.
    Singleton CD; Reuter S
    Br J Fam Plann; 1999 Jul; 25(2):41-4. PubMed ID: 10454653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Asian women's use of specialist Contraception, Sexual and Reproductive Health Services in Leicester, UK.
    Moses S; Oloto E
    J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care; 2010 Jul; 36(3):137-40. PubMed ID: 20659366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The effects of self-administering emergency contraception.
    Glasier A; Baird D
    N Engl J Med; 1998 Jul; 339(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 9647872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Choice, access, information are among clients' rights.
    Finger WR
    Netw Res Triangle Park N C; 1993 Aug; 14(1):24-6. PubMed ID: 12345035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Knowledge of emergency contraception amongst female patients attending a department of genitourinary medicine.
    Mann MC; Radeliffe KW; Basarab M
    Br J Fam Plann; 1999 Jul; 25(2):58-62. PubMed ID: 10454656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Contraceptive use among women presenting to pharmacies for emergency contraception: an opportunity for intervention.
    Michie L; Cameron ST; Glasier A; Greed E
    J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care; 2014 Jul; 40(3):190-5. PubMed ID: 24465023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Impact of the October 1995 pill scare in Grampian.
    Flett G; Gurney E; McKessock L; Reid J
    Br J Fam Plann; 1998 Apr; 24(1):18-20. PubMed ID: 9719702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Emergency hormonal contraception: the community pharmacy perspective.
    Seston EM; Holden K; Cantrill J
    J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care; 2001 Oct; 27(4):203-8. PubMed ID: 12457468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Meeting women's need for a flexible abortion service: retrospective study of a specialist day-care unit.
    Lowy A; Ojo R; Stegeman A; Vellacott I
    J Public Health Med; 1998 Dec; 20(4):449-54. PubMed ID: 9923953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Provision of emergency contraception by nurses: a way forward to increased access.
    Jarvis RR; Webb A; Kishen M
    Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 1996 Sep; 1(3):257-62. PubMed ID: 9678124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Contraception and abortion in Romania.
    Johnson BR; Horga M; Andronache L
    Lancet; 1993 Apr; 341(8849):875-8. PubMed ID: 8096575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Self-care/health maintenance and contraceptive use, information needs, and knowledge of a selected group of university women.
    Hawkins JW; Fahey M; Kurien M; Roberto D; Simon R
    Issues Health Care Women; 1981; 3(5-6):287-305. PubMed ID: 6926428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.