601 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17279534)
1. Malignant-lesion segmentation using 4D co-occurrence texture analysis applied to dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance breast image data.
Woods BJ; Clymer BD; Kurc T; Heverhagen JT; Stevens R; Orsdemir A; Bulan O; Knopp MV
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Mar; 25(3):495-501. PubMed ID: 17279534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Breast MRI lesion classification: improved performance of human readers with a backpropagation neural network computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) system.
Meinel LA; Stolpen AH; Berbaum KS; Fajardo LL; Reinhardt JM
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Jan; 25(1):89-95. PubMed ID: 17154399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A new contrast in MR mammography by means of chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) imaging at 3 Tesla: preliminary results.
Schmitt B; Zamecnik P; Zaiss M; Rerich E; Schuster L; Bachert P; Schlemmer HP
Rofo; 2011 Nov; 183(11):1030-6. PubMed ID: 22034086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Added value of breathhold diffusion-weighted MRI in detection of small hepatocellular carcinoma lesions compared with dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI alone using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.
Xu PJ; Yan FH; Wang JH; Lin J; Ji Y
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2009 Feb; 29(2):341-9. PubMed ID: 19161186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Diagnosis of breast tumors by contrast-enhanced MR imaging: comparison between the diagnostic performance of dynamic enhancement patterns and morphologic features.
Goto M; Ito H; Akazawa K; Kubota T; Kizu O; Yamada K; Nishimura T
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Jan; 25(1):104-12. PubMed ID: 17152054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of the three-time-point method for diagnosis of breast lesions in contrast-enhanced MR mammography.
Hauth EA; Stockamp C; Maderwald S; Mühler A; Kimmig R; Jaeger H; Barkhausen J; Forsting M
Clin Imaging; 2006; 30(3):160-5. PubMed ID: 16632149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Gadobenate dimeglumine as a contrast agent for dynamic breast magnetic resonance imaging: effect of higher initial enhancement thresholds on diagnostic performance.
Sardanelli F; Fausto A; Esseridou A; Di Leo G; Kirchin MA
Invest Radiol; 2008 Apr; 43(4):236-42. PubMed ID: 18340247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of time-intensity curves in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and mastopathy obtained using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.
Nishiura M; Yasuhiro T; Murase K
Magn Reson Imaging; 2011 Jan; 29(1):99-105. PubMed ID: 20833496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fast 3D Near-infrared breast imaging using indocyanine green for detection and characterization of breast lesions.
Schneider P; Piper S; Schmitz CH; Schreiter NF; Volkwein N; Lüdemann L; Malzahn U; Poellinger A
Rofo; 2011 Oct; 183(10):956-63. PubMed ID: 21972043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Classification of breast mass lesions using model-based analysis of the characteristic kinetic curve derived from fuzzy c-means clustering.
Chang YC; Huang YH; Huang CS; Chang PK; Chen JH; Chang RF
Magn Reson Imaging; 2012 Apr; 30(3):312-22. PubMed ID: 22245697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Multimodality computerized diagnosis of breast lesions using mammography and sonography.
Drukker K; Horsch K; Giger ML
Acad Radiol; 2005 Aug; 12(8):970-9. PubMed ID: 16087091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Enhanced mass on contrast-enhanced breast MR imaging: Lesion characterization using combination of dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MR images.
Yabuuchi H; Matsuo Y; Okafuji T; Kamitani T; Soeda H; Setoguchi T; Sakai S; Hatakenaka M; Kubo M; Sadanaga N; Yamamoto H; Honda H
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Nov; 28(5):1157-65. PubMed ID: 18972357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An adaptive tissue characterization network for model-free visualization of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance image data.
Twellmann T; Lichte O; Nattkemper TW
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2005 Oct; 24(10):1256-66. PubMed ID: 16229413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Handling a high relaxivity contrast material for dynamic breast MR imaging using higher thresholds for the initial enhancement.
Carbonaro LA; Verardi N; Di Leo G; Sardanelli F
Invest Radiol; 2010 Mar; 45(3):114-20. PubMed ID: 20065856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Characterization of spatiotemporal changes for the classification of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic-resonance breast lesions.
Milenković J; Hertl K; Košir A; Zibert J; Tasič JF
Artif Intell Med; 2013 Jun; 58(2):101-14. PubMed ID: 23548472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Observer study of a prototype clinical decision support system for breast cancer diagnosis using dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.
Boroczky L; Simpson M; Abe H; Drysdale J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Feb; 200(2):277-83. PubMed ID: 23345346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Breast lesions: evaluation with dynamic contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MR imaging and with T2*-weighted first-pass perfusion MR imaging.
Kvistad KA; Rydland J; Vainio J; Smethurst HB; Lundgren S; Fjøsne HE; Haraldseth O
Radiology; 2000 Aug; 216(2):545-53. PubMed ID: 10924584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Neural network analysis of breast cancer from MRI findings.
Abdolmaleki P; Buadu LD; Murayama S; Murakami J; Hashiguchi N; Yabuuchi H; Masuda K
Radiat Med; 1997; 15(5):283-93. PubMed ID: 9445150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. New spatiotemporal features for improved discrimination of benign and malignant lesions in dynamic contrast-enhanced-magnetic resonance imaging of the breast.
Gal Y; Mehnert A; Bradley A; Kennedy D; Crozier S
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2011; 35(5):645-52. PubMed ID: 21926864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MR imaging.
Moon M; Cornfeld D; Weinreb J
Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 2009 May; 17(2):351-62. PubMed ID: 19406363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
