BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

224 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17279848)

  • 1. Why some groups just feel better: the regulatory fit of group power.
    Sassenberg K; Jonas KJ; Shah JY; Brazy PC
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2007 Feb; 92(2):249-67. PubMed ID: 17279848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Strength and safety in numbers: considering the social implications of regulatory focus.
    Brazy PC; Shah JY
    J Pers; 2006 Dec; 74(6):1647-71. PubMed ID: 17083661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Moral value transfer from regulatory fit: what feels right is right and what feels wrong is wrong.
    Camacho CJ; Higgins ET; Luger L
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2003 Mar; 84(3):498-510. PubMed ID: 12635912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison focus in intergroup comparisons: who we compare to whom influences who we see as powerful and agentic.
    Bruckmüller S; Abele AE
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2010 Oct; 36(10):1424-35. PubMed ID: 20841435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Regulatory focus and illusions of control.
    Langens TA
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2007 Feb; 33(2):226-37. PubMed ID: 17259583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. "A vengefulness of the impotent": the pain of in-group inferiority and schadenfreude toward successful out-groups.
    Leach CW; Spears R
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2008 Dec; 95(6):1383-96. PubMed ID: 19025290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The implicit power motive and sociosexuality in men and women: Pancultural effects of responsibility.
    Hofer J; Busch H; Bond MH; Campos D; Li M; Law R
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2010 Aug; 99(2):380-94. PubMed ID: 20658850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Motivation by positive or negative role models: regulatory focus determines who will best inspire us.
    Lockwood P; Jordan CH; Kunda Z
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2002 Oct; 83(4):854-64. PubMed ID: 12374440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Promotion and prevention focus on alternative hypotheses: implications for attributional functions.
    Liberman N; Molden DC; Idson LC; Higgins ET
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2001 Jan; 80(1):5-18. PubMed ID: 11195890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of power on perceived and objective group variability: evidence that more powerful groups are more variable.
    Guinote A; Judd CM; Brauer M
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2002 May; 82(5):708-21. PubMed ID: 12003472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of affiliation and power motivation arousal on salivary progesterone and testosterone.
    Schultheiss OC; Wirth MM; Stanton SJ
    Horm Behav; 2004 Dec; 46(5):592-9. PubMed ID: 15555501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. When does self-sacrificial leadership motivate prosocial behavior? It depends on followers' prevention focus.
    De Cremer D; Mayer DM; van Dijke M; Bardes M; Schouten BC
    J Appl Psychol; 2009 Jul; 94(4):887-99. PubMed ID: 19594232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Diversity in in-group bias: structural factors, situational features, and social functions.
    Scheepers D; Spears R; Doosje B; Manstead AS
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2006 Jun; 90(6):944-60. PubMed ID: 16784344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fit to forgive: Exploring the interaction between regulatory focus, repentance, and forgiveness.
    Santelli AG; Struthers CW; Eaton J
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2009 Feb; 96(2):381-94. PubMed ID: 19159138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Motivated self-stereotyping: heightened assimilation and differentiation needs result in increased levels of positive and negative self-stereotyping.
    Pickett CL; Bonner BL; Coleman JM
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2002 Apr; 82(4):543-62. PubMed ID: 11999923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The impact of social comparison information on motivation in patients with diabetes as a function of regulatory focus and self-efficacy.
    Schokker MC; Keers JC; Bouma J; Links TP; Sanderman R; Wolffenbuttel BH; Hagedoorn M
    Health Psychol; 2010 Jul; 29(4):438-45. PubMed ID: 20658832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Working for the self or working for the group: how self- versus group affirmation affects collective behavior in low-status groups.
    Derks B; van Laar C; Ellemers N
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2009 Jan; 96(1):183-202. PubMed ID: 19210074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Empowering potential: a theory of wellness motivation.
    Fleury JD
    Nurs Res; 1991; 40(5):286-91. PubMed ID: 1896327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Power in group contexts: the influence of group status on promotion and prevention decision making.
    Scheepers D; Ellemers N; Sassenberg K
    Br J Soc Psychol; 2013 Jun; 52(2):238-54. PubMed ID: 21950319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Procedural justice climate and group power distance: an examination of cross-level interaction effects.
    Yang J; Mossholder KW; Peng TK
    J Appl Psychol; 2007 May; 92(3):681-92. PubMed ID: 17484550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.