375 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17280887)
1. Influence of bond quality on failure load of leucite- and lithia disilicate-based ceramics.
Clelland NL; Ramirez A; Katsube N; Seghi RR
J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Jan; 97(1):18-24. PubMed ID: 17280887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dentin bond strengths of two ceramic inlay systems after cementation with three different techniques and one bonding system.
Ozturk N; Aykent F
J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Mar; 89(3):275-81. PubMed ID: 12644803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Influence of interface surface conditions on indentation failure of simulated bonded ceramic onlays.
Clelland NL; Warchol N; Kerby RE; Katsube N; Seghi RR
Dent Mater; 2006 Feb; 22(2):99-106. PubMed ID: 16081154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Bonding of lithium-disilicate ceramic to enamel and dentin using orthotropic fiber-reinforced composite at the interface.
Ergun G; Cekic I; Lassila LV; Vallittu PK
Acta Odontol Scand; 2006 Oct; 64(5):293-9. PubMed ID: 16945895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Residual interface tensile strength of ceramic bonded to dentin after cyclic loading and aging.
Hernandez AI; Roongruangphol T; Katsube N; Seghi RR
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Mar; 99(3):209-17. PubMed ID: 18319092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dynamic fatigue and fracture resistance of non-retentive all-ceramic full-coverage molar restorations. Influence of ceramic material and preparation design.
Clausen JO; Abou Tara M; Kern M
Dent Mater; 2010 Jun; 26(6):533-8. PubMed ID: 20181388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. In vitro evaluation of push-out bond strength of direct ceramic inlays to tooth surface with fiber-reinforced composite at the interface.
Cekic I; Ergun G; Uctasli S; Lassila LV
J Prosthet Dent; 2007 May; 97(5):271-8. PubMed ID: 17547945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. In vitro study of fracture load and fracture pattern of ceramic crowns: a finite element and fractography analysis.
Campos RE; Soares CJ; Quagliatto PS; Soares PV; de Oliveira OB; Santos-Filho PC; Salazar-Marocho SM
J Prosthodont; 2011 Aug; 20(6):447-55. PubMed ID: 21843228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. All-ceramic partial coverage restorations on natural molars. Masticatory fatigue loading and fracture resistance.
Stappert CF; Guess PC; Chitmongkolsuk S; Gerds T; Strub JR
Am J Dent; 2007 Feb; 20(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 17380803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effect of endodontic access preparation on the failure load of lithium disilicate glass-ceramic restorations.
Qeblawi D; Hill T; Chlosta K
J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Nov; 106(5):328-36. PubMed ID: 22024183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of surface treatment on roughness and bond strength of a heat-pressed ceramic.
Ayad MF; Fahmy NZ; Rosenstiel SF
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 18262013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effect of hydrofluoric acid surface treatment and bond strength of a zirconia veneering ceramic.
Chaiyabutr Y; McGowan S; Phillips KM; Kois JC; Giordano RA
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Sep; 100(3):194-202. PubMed ID: 18762031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars restored with CAD/CAM ceramic inlays.
Hannig C; Westphal C; Becker K; Attin T
J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Oct; 94(4):342-9. PubMed ID: 16198171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Microleakage of ceramic inlays luted with different resin cements and dentin adhesives.
Uludag B; Ozturk O; Ozturk AN
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Oct; 102(4):235-41. PubMed ID: 19782826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Fracture loads of all-ceramic crowns under wet and dry fatigue conditions.
Borges GA; Caldas D; Taskonak B; Yan J; Sobrinho LC; de Oliveira WJ
J Prosthodont; 2009 Dec; 18(8):649-55. PubMed ID: 19682214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Fracture resistance of aluminium oxide and lithium disilicate-based crowns using different luting cements: an in vitro study.
Al-Wahadni AM; Hussey DL; Grey N; Hatamleh MM
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2009 Mar; 10(2):51-8. PubMed ID: 19279972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of shear and tensile bond strength between dentin and ceramics using dual-polymerizing resin cements.
Pekkan G; Hekimoglu C
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Oct; 102(4):242-52. PubMed ID: 19782827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of two bond strength testing methodologies for bilayered all-ceramics.
Dündar M; Ozcan M; Gökçe B; Cömlekoğlu E; Leite F; Valandro LF
Dent Mater; 2007 May; 23(5):630-6. PubMed ID: 16844212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The influence of veneering porcelain thickness of all-ceramic and metal ceramic crowns on failure resistance after cyclic loading.
Shirakura A; Lee H; Geminiani A; Ercoli C; Feng C
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Feb; 101(2):119-27. PubMed ID: 19167536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Influence of cavity preparation design on fracture resistance of posterior Leucite-reinforced ceramic restorations.
Soares CJ; Martins LR; Fonseca RB; Correr-Sobrinho L; Fernandes Neto AJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Jun; 95(6):421-9. PubMed ID: 16765154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
