These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17280972)

  • 1. Effect of adaptive-neighborhood contrast enhancement on the extraction of the breast skin-line in mammograms.
    Sun Y; Janer R; Suri J; Ye Z; Rangayyan R
    Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2005; 2005():3475-8. PubMed ID: 17280972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Improvement of sensitivity of breast cancer diagnosis with adaptive neighborhood contrast enhancement of mammograms.
    Rangayyan RM; Shen L; Shen Y; Desautels JE; Bryant H; Terry TJ; Horeczko N; Rose MS
    IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed; 1997 Sep; 1(3):161-70. PubMed ID: 11020818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Estimation of the breast skin-line in mammograms using multidirectional Gabor filters.
    Casti P; Mencattini A; Salmeri M; Ancona A; Mangeri F; Pepe ML; Rangayyan RM
    Comput Biol Med; 2013 Nov; 43(11):1870-81. PubMed ID: 24209932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Improvement in the performance of the adaptive neighborhood contrast enhancement technique based on entropy].
    Chiba R; Lee Y; Tsai DY
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2005 Feb; 61(2):268-76. PubMed ID: 15753868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Breast skin-line detection using dynamic programming.
    Silva CA; Lima CG; Correia JH
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2011; 2011():7775-8. PubMed ID: 22256141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Detection and Segmentation of Pectoral Muscle on MLO-View Mammogram Using Enhancement Filter.
    Vikhe PS; Thool VR
    J Med Syst; 2017 Oct; 41(12):190. PubMed ID: 29071592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Automatic identification of the pectoral muscle in mammograms.
    Ferrari RJ; Rangayyan RM; Desautels JE; Borges RA; Frère AF
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2004 Feb; 23(2):232-45. PubMed ID: 14964567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Density correction of peripheral breast tissue on digital mammograms.
    Bick U; Giger ML; Schmidt RA; Nishikawa RM; Doi K
    Radiographics; 1996 Nov; 16(6):1403-11. PubMed ID: 8946544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Improving the Automated Detection of Calcifications Using Adaptive Variance Stabilization.
    Bria A; Marrocco C; Borges LR; Molinara M; Marchesi A; Mordang JJ; Karssemeijer N; Tortorella F
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2018 Aug; 37(8):1857-1864. PubMed ID: 29994062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Automated and effective content-based image retrieval for digital mammography.
    Singh VP; Srivastava S; Srivastava R
    J Xray Sci Technol; 2018; 26(1):29-49. PubMed ID: 29480232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of enhancement methods for mammograms with performance measures.
    Kurt B; Nabiyev VV; Turhan K
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2014; 205():486-90. PubMed ID: 25160232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mass Detection in Mammographic Images Using Wavelet Processing and Adaptive Threshold Technique.
    Vikhe PS; Thool VR
    J Med Syst; 2016 Apr; 40(4):82. PubMed ID: 26811073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Breast segmentation in screening mammograms using multiscale analysis and self-organizing maps.
    Erin Rickard H; Tourassi G; Eltons N; Elmaghrab A
    Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2004; 2004():1786-9. PubMed ID: 17272054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Breast peripheral area correction in digital mammograms.
    Tortajada M; Oliver A; Martí R; Ganau S; Tortajada L; Sentís M; Freixenet J; Zwiggelaar R
    Comput Biol Med; 2014 Jul; 50():32-40. PubMed ID: 24845018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A New Breast Border Extraction and Contrast Enhancement Technique with Digital Mammogram Images for Improved Detection of Breast Cancer.
    Hazarika M; Mahanta LB
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2018 Aug; 19(8):2141-2148. PubMed ID: 30139217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A regional registration technique for automated interval change analysis of breast lesions on mammograms.
    Sanjay-Gopal S; Chan HP; Wilson T; Helvie M; Petrick N; Sahiner B
    Med Phys; 1999 Dec; 26(12):2669-79. PubMed ID: 10619252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A dual stage adaptive thresholding (DuSAT) for automatic mass detection in mammograms.
    Anitha J; Dinesh Peter J; Immanuel Alex Pandian S
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2017 Jan; 138():93-104. PubMed ID: 27886719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Contrast limited adaptive histogram equalization image processing to improve the detection of simulated spiculations in dense mammograms.
    Pisano ED; Zong S; Hemminger BM; DeLuca M; Johnston RE; Muller K; Braeuning MP; Pizer SM
    J Digit Imaging; 1998 Nov; 11(4):193-200. PubMed ID: 9848052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An unsupervised automatic segmentation algorithm for breast tissue classification of dedicated breast computed tomography images.
    Caballo M; Boone JM; Mann R; Sechopoulos I
    Med Phys; 2018 Jun; 45(6):2542-2559. PubMed ID: 29676025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Globally supported radial basis function based collocation method for evolution of level set in mass segmentation using mammograms.
    Kashyap KL; Bajpai MK; Khanna P
    Comput Biol Med; 2017 Aug; 87():22-37. PubMed ID: 28549292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.