These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17281886)

  • 1. Glottal Waves via Inverse Filtering of Vowel Sounds.
    Deng H; Ward R; Beddoes M
    Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2005; 2005():7000-3. PubMed ID: 17281886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Analysis of Glottal Inverse Filtering in the Presence of Source-Filter Interaction.
    Palaparthi A; Titze IR
    Speech Commun; 2020 Oct; 123():98-108. PubMed ID: 32921855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Association of breathing sound spectra with glottal dimensions in exercise-induced vocal cord dysfunction.
    Geneid A; Aaltonen LM; Porra L; Peltonen J; Palmu K; Sovijärvi A; Piirilä P
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Nov; 274(11):3933-3940. PubMed ID: 28852841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Subglottal Impedance-Based Inverse Filtering of Voiced Sounds Using Neck Surface Acceleration.
    Zañartu M; Ho JC; Mehta DD; Hillman RE; Wodicka GR
    IEEE Trans Audio Speech Lang Process; 2013 Sep; 21(9):1929-1939. PubMed ID: 25400531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Contributions of the glottal source and vocal tract cues to emotional vowel perception in the valence-arousal space.
    Li Y; Li J; Akagi M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Aug; 144(2):908. PubMed ID: 30180717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Kalman Filter Implementation of Subglottal Impedance-Based Inverse Filtering to Estimate Glottal Airflow during Phonation.
    Cortés JP; Alzamendi GA; Weinstein AJ; Yuz JI; Espinoza VM; Mehta DD; Hillman RE; Zañartu M
    Appl Sci (Basel); 2022 Jan; 12(1):. PubMed ID: 36313121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Acoustic analysis of trill sounds.
    Dhananjaya N; Yegnanarayana B; Bhaskararao P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Apr; 131(4):3141-52. PubMed ID: 22501086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Closed phase covariance analysis based on constrained linear prediction for glottal inverse filtering.
    Alku P; Magi C; Yrttiaho S; Bäckström T; Story B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 May; 125(5):3289-305. PubMed ID: 19425671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Study of the effects of vocal tract constriction on glottal vibration.
    Mittal VK; Yegnanarayana B; Bhaskararao P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Oct; 136(4):1932-41. PubMed ID: 25324092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Glottal inverse filtering with the closed-phase covariance analysis utilizing mathematical constraints in modelling of the vocal tract.
    Alku P; Magi C; Bäckström T
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2009 Dec; 34(4):200-9. PubMed ID: 19415566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Glottal volume velocity waveform characteristics in subjects with and without vocal training, related to gender, sound intensity, fundamental frequency, and age.
    Sulter AM; Wit HP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Nov; 100(5):3360-73. PubMed ID: 8914317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Glottal Adduction and Subglottal Pressure in Singing.
    Herbst CT; Hess M; Müller F; Švec JG; Sundberg J
    J Voice; 2015 Jul; 29(4):391-402. PubMed ID: 25944295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of thyroplasty type I on vocal fold vibration.
    Omori K; Slavit DH; Kacker A; Blaugrund SM; Kojima H
    Laryngoscope; 2000 Jul; 110(7):1086-91. PubMed ID: 10892675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evidence of the significance of secondary excitations of the vocal tract for vocal intensity.
    Alku P; Vintturi J; Vilkman E
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2001; 53(4):185-97. PubMed ID: 11385278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Measuring and modeling vocal source-tract interaction.
    Childers DG; Wong CF
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1994 Jul; 41(7):663-71. PubMed ID: 7927387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Glottal configuration associated with fundamental frequency and vocal register.
    Murry T; Xu JJ; Woodson GE
    J Voice; 1998 Mar; 12(1):44-9. PubMed ID: 9619978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Experimental evaluation of inverse filtering using physical systems with known glottal flow and tract characteristics.
    Chu DT; Li K; Epps J; Smith J; Wolfe J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 May; 133(5):EL358-62. PubMed ID: 23656094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Determination of glottal open regions by exploiting changes in the vocal tract system characteristics.
    Prasad RS; Yegnanarayana B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Jul; 140(1):666. PubMed ID: 27475188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Glottal Aerodynamic Measures in Women With Phonotraumatic and Nonphonotraumatic Vocal Hyperfunction.
    Espinoza VM; Zañartu M; Van Stan JH; Mehta DD; Hillman RE
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2017 Aug; 60(8):2159-2169. PubMed ID: 28785762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Indirect assessment of the contribution of subglottal air pressure and vocal-fold tension to changes of fundamental frequency in English.
    Monsen RB; Engebretson AM; Vemula NR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1978 Jul; 64(1):65-80. PubMed ID: 712003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.