These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17282496)

  • 21. Using reciprocity for relating the simulation of transcranial current stimulation to the EEG forward problem.
    Wagner S; Lucka F; Vorwerk J; Herrmann CS; Nolte G; Burger M; Wolters CH
    Neuroimage; 2016 Oct; 140():163-73. PubMed ID: 27125841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparison of realistic head modeling methods in EEG source imaging - biomed 2010.
    Vatta F; Meneghini F; Esposito F; Mininel S; Disalle F
    Biomed Sci Instrum; 2010; 46():398-403. PubMed ID: 20467114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A simple method for EEG guided transcranial electrical stimulation without models.
    Cancelli A; Cottone C; Tecchio F; Truong DQ; Dmochowski J; Bikson M
    J Neural Eng; 2016 Jun; 13(3):036022. PubMed ID: 27172063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A computationally efficient method for accurately solving the EEG forward problem in a finely discretized head model.
    Neilson LA; Kovalyov M; Koles ZJ
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Oct; 116(10):2302-14. PubMed ID: 16125461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The FieldTrip-SimBio pipeline for EEG forward solutions.
    Vorwerk J; Oostenveld R; Piastra MC; Magyari L; Wolters CH
    Biomed Eng Online; 2018 Mar; 17(1):37. PubMed ID: 29580236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Individually shaped volume conductor models of the head in EEG source localisation.
    Zanow F; Peters MJ
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 1995 Jul; 33(4):582-8. PubMed ID: 7475391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effects of local skull inhomogeneities on EEG source estimation.
    Ollikainen JO; Vauhkonen M; Karjalainen PA; Kaipio JP
    Med Eng Phys; 1999 Apr; 21(3):143-54. PubMed ID: 10468356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Solving the ECG forward problem by means of a meshless finite element method.
    Li ZS; Zhu SA; He B
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(13):N287-96. PubMed ID: 17664567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Rapidly recomputable EEG forward models for realistic head shapes.
    Ermer JJ; Mosher JC; Baillet S; Leah RM
    Phys Med Biol; 2001 Apr; 46(4):1265-81. PubMed ID: 11324964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Reduced conductivity dependence method for increase of dipole localization accuracy in the EEG inverse problem.
    Yitembe BR; Crevecoeur G; Van Keer R; Dupre L
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2011 May; 58(5):1430-40. PubMed ID: 21257364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. On the estimation of the number of dipole sources in EEG source localization.
    Bai X; He B
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Sep; 116(9):2037-43. PubMed ID: 16043395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Development of volume conductor and source models to localize epileptic foci.
    Fuchs M; Wagner M; Kastner J
    J Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Apr; 24(2):101-19. PubMed ID: 17414966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Linear inverse solutions: simulations from a realistic head model in MEG.
    Soufflet L; Boeijinga PH
    Brain Topogr; 2005; 18(2):87-99. PubMed ID: 16341577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Dipole models for the EEG and MEG.
    Schimpf PH; Ramon C; Haueisen J
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2002 May; 49(5):409-18. PubMed ID: 12002172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Forward and inverse problems of EEG dipole localization.
    Musha T; Okamoto Y
    Crit Rev Biomed Eng; 1999; 27(3-5):189-239. PubMed ID: 10864280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Influence of anisotropic electrical conductivity in white matter tissue on the EEG/MEG forward and inverse solution. A high-resolution whole head simulation study.
    Güllmar D; Haueisen J; Reichenbach JR
    Neuroimage; 2010 May; 51(1):145-63. PubMed ID: 20156576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. EEG in neonates: Forward modeling and sensitivity analysis with respect to variations of the conductivity.
    Azizollahi H; Darbas M; Diallo MM; Badia AE; Lohrengel S
    Math Biosci Eng; 2018 Aug; 15(4):905-932. PubMed ID: 30380315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison Study for Whitney (Raviart-Thomas)-Type Source Models in Finite-Element-Method-Based EEG Forward Modeling.
    Bauer M; Pursiainen S; Vorwerk J; Kostler H; Wolters CH
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2015 Nov; 62(11):2648-56. PubMed ID: 26054057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Numerical calculation of the potential distribution due to dipole sources in a spherical model of the head.
    Abboud S; Eshel Y; Levy S; Rosenfeld M
    Comput Biomed Res; 1994 Dec; 27(6):441-55. PubMed ID: 7895472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Solving the ECG forward problem by means of standard h- and h-hierarchical adaptive linear boundary element method: comparison with two refinement schemes.
    Shou G; Xia L; Jiang M; Wei Q; Liu F; Crozier S
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2009 May; 56(5):1454-64. PubMed ID: 19272882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.