These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17282928)

  • 1. Shape Analysis of Breast Masses in Mammograms via the Fractal Dimension.
    Nguyen T; Rangayyan R
    Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2005; 2005():3210-3. PubMed ID: 17282928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fractal analysis of contours of breast masses in mammograms.
    Rangayyan RM; Nguyen TM
    J Digit Imaging; 2007 Sep; 20(3):223-37. PubMed ID: 17021926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fractal analysis of contours of breast masses in mammograms via the power spectra of their signatures.
    Rangayyan RM; Oloumi F; Nguyen TM
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2010; 2010():6737-40. PubMed ID: 21095828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Feature extraction from a signature based on the turning angle function for the classification of breast tumors.
    Guliato D; de Carvalho JD; Rangayyan RM; Santiago SA
    J Digit Imaging; 2008 Jun; 21(2):129-44. PubMed ID: 17972137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fractal analysis of mammographic lesions: a feasibility study quantifying the difference between benign and malignant masses.
    Velanovich V
    Am J Med Sci; 1996 May; 311(5):211-4. PubMed ID: 8615395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Polygonal modeling of contours of breast tumors with the preservation of spicules.
    Guliato D; Rangayyan RM; Carvalho JD; Santiago SA
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2008 Jan; 55(1):14-20. PubMed ID: 18232342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An efficient fractal method for detection and diagnosis of breast masses in mammograms.
    Beheshti SM; AhmadiNoubari H; Fatemizadeh E; Khalili M
    J Digit Imaging; 2014 Oct; 27(5):661-9. PubMed ID: 24777687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Discrimination of MR images of breast masses with fractal-interpolation function models.
    Penn AI; Bolinger L; Schnall MD; Loew MH
    Acad Radiol; 1999 Mar; 6(3):156-63. PubMed ID: 10898034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Breast masses in mammography classification with local contour features.
    Li H; Meng X; Wang T; Tang Y; Yin Y
    Biomed Eng Online; 2017 Apr; 16(1):44. PubMed ID: 28410616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Detection of breast masses in mammograms by density slicing and texture flow-field analysis.
    Mudigonda NR; Rangayyan RM; Desautels JE
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2001 Dec; 20(12):1215-27. PubMed ID: 11811822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A computer-aided detection of the architectural distortion in digital mammograms using the fractal dimension measurements of BEMD.
    Zyout I; Togneri R
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2018 Dec; 70():173-184. PubMed ID: 29691123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Boundary modelling and shape analysis methods for classification of mammographic masses.
    Rangayyan RM; Mudigonda NR; Desautels JE
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2000 Sep; 38(5):487-96. PubMed ID: 11094803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fractal analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns in breast cancer risk assessment.
    Li H; Giger ML; Olopade OI; Lan L
    Acad Radiol; 2007 May; 14(5):513-21. PubMed ID: 17434064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Classification of breast masses via nonlinear transformation of features based on a kernel matrix.
    Mu T; Nandi AK; Rangayyan RM
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2007 Aug; 45(8):769-80. PubMed ID: 17659369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of a Quasi-fractal Dimension to Enhance Breast Cancer Detection in X-ray Mammograms using Support Vector Machine.
    Murase K; Tanki N; Miyazaki S; Nagao M
    Igaku Butsuri; 2008; 28(1):15-25. PubMed ID: 21976251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Detection and classification of Breast Cancer in Wavelet Sub-bands of Fractal Segmented Cancerous Zones.
    Shirazinodeh A; Noubari HA; Rabbani H; Dehnavi AM
    J Med Signals Sens; 2015; 5(3):162-70. PubMed ID: 26284172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Breast mass classification on mammograms using radial local ternary patterns.
    Muramatsu C; Hara T; Endo T; Fujita H
    Comput Biol Med; 2016 May; 72():43-53. PubMed ID: 27015322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A fuzzy rule-based approach for characterization of mammogram masses into BI-RADS shape categories.
    Vadivel A; Surendiran B
    Comput Biol Med; 2013 May; 43(4):259-67. PubMed ID: 23414779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Benign versus malignant solid breast masses: US differentiation.
    Rahbar G; Sie AC; Hansen GC; Prince JS; Melany ML; Reynolds HE; Jackson VP; Sayre JW; Bassett LW
    Radiology; 1999 Dec; 213(3):889-94. PubMed ID: 10580971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mammographic masses characterization based on localized texture and dataset fractal analysis using linear, neural and support vector machine classifiers.
    Mavroforakis ME; Georgiou HV; Dimitropoulos N; Cavouras D; Theodoridis S
    Artif Intell Med; 2006 Jun; 37(2):145-62. PubMed ID: 16716579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.