418 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17283600)
1. The integration of ecological risk assessment and structured decision making into watershed management.
Ohlson DW; Serveiss VB
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2007 Jan; 3(1):118-28. PubMed ID: 17283600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Translating ecological risk to ecosystem service loss.
Munns WR; Helm RC; Adams WJ; Clements WH; Cramer MA; Curry M; DiPinto LM; Johns DM; Seiler R; Williams LL; Young D
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2009 Oct; 5(4):500-14. PubMed ID: 19545189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Enhancing the ecological risk assessment process.
Dale VH; Biddinger GR; Newman MC; Oris JT; Suter GW; Thompson T; Armitage TM; Meyer JL; Allen-King RM; Burton GA; Chapman PM; Conquest LL; Fernandez IJ; Landis WG; Master LL; Mitsch WJ; Mueller TC; Rabeni CF; Rodewald AD; Sanders JG; van Heerden IL
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2008 Jul; 4(3):306-13. PubMed ID: 18324871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Overview of integrative tools and methods in assessing ecological integrity in estuarine and coastal systems worldwide.
Borja A; Bricker SB; Dauer DM; Demetriades NT; Ferreira JG; Forbes AT; Hutchings P; Jia X; Kenchington R; Carlos Marques J; Zhu C
Mar Pollut Bull; 2008 Sep; 56(9):1519-37. PubMed ID: 18715596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Ecological effects of diffuse mixed pollution are site-specific and require higher-tier risk assessment to improve site management decisions: a discussion paper.
Leo P; Eijsackers HJ; Koelmans AA; Vijver MG
Sci Total Environ; 2008 Dec; 406(3):503-17. PubMed ID: 18757078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An examination of ecological risk assessment and management practices.
Hope BK
Environ Int; 2006 Dec; 32(8):983-95. PubMed ID: 16843527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Use of simulation mass balance modeling to estimate phosphorus and bacteria dynamics in watersheds.
Cassell EA; Meals DW; Aschmann SG; Anderson DP; Rosen BH; Kort RL; Dorioz JM
Water Sci Technol; 2002; 45(9):157-66. PubMed ID: 12079098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Towards an integrated approach to natural hazards risk assessment using GIS: with reference to bushfires.
Chen K; Blong R; Jacobson C
Environ Manage; 2003 Apr; 31(4):546-60. PubMed ID: 12677299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Development of a preliminary relative risk model for evaluating regional ecological conditions in the Delaware River Estuary, USA.
Iannuzzi TJ; Durda JL; Preziosi DV; Ludwig DF; Stahl RG; DeSantis AA; Hoke RA
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2010 Jan; 6(1):164-79. PubMed ID: 19689170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Watershed approach in water resources planning and quality management.
Khadse GK; Nanoti MV
J Environ Sci Eng; 2007 Jul; 49(3):178-82. PubMed ID: 18476440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Risk based urban watershed management under conflicting objectives.
Novotny V; Clark D; Griffin RJ; Booth D
Water Sci Technol; 2001; 43(5):69-78. PubMed ID: 11379158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Application of risk assessment and decision analysis to aquatic nuisance species.
Suedel BC; Bridges TS; Kim J; Payne BS; Miller AC
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2007 Jan; 3(1):79-89. PubMed ID: 17283597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A risk-informed decision framework for setting environmental windows for dredging projects.
Suedel BC; Kim J; Clarke DG; Linkov I
Sci Total Environ; 2008 Sep; 403(1-3):1-11. PubMed ID: 18571217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prioritization of water management for sustainability using hydrologic simulation model and multicriteria decision making techniques.
Chung ES; Lee KS
J Environ Manage; 2009 Mar; 90(3):1502-11. PubMed ID: 19062153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Population-scale assessment endpoints in ecological risk assessment. Part 1: Reflections of stakeholder values.
Landis WG
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2006 Jan; 2(1):86-91. PubMed ID: 16640323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Minimizing risks from spilled oil to ecosystem services using influence diagrams: the Deepwater Horizon spill response.
Carriger JF; Barron MG
Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Sep; 45(18):7631-9. PubMed ID: 21875054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Incorporating sediment stability within the management of contaminated sediment sites: a synthesis approach.
Bohlen WF; Erickson MJ
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2006 Jan; 2(1):24-8. PubMed ID: 16640313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The strengths of the ecological risk assessment process: linking science to decision making.
Barnthouse L
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2008 Jul; 4(3):299-305. PubMed ID: 18597567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Better environmental decision making - recent progress and future trends.
Pollard SJ; Davies GJ; Coley F; Lemon M
Sci Total Environ; 2008 Aug; 400(1-3):20-31. PubMed ID: 18774589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. European environmental management: moving to an ecosystem approach.
Apitz SE; Elliott M; Fountain M; Galloway TS
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2006 Jan; 2(1):80-5. PubMed ID: 16640322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
