These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1728468)

  • 1. Evaluation of emerging technologies for coronary revascularization. Participants in the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Conference on the Evaluation of Emerging Coronary Revascularization Technologies.
    Circulation; 1992 Jan; 85(1):357-61. PubMed ID: 1728468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Problems in the evaluation of new devices for coronary intervention: what have we learned since 1989?
    Baim DS; Leon MB; Popma JJ; Kuntz RE; Safian RD; Desvigne Nickens P; Detre KM
    Am J Cardiol; 1997 Nov; 80(10A):3K-9K. PubMed ID: 9409687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Coronary revascularization: 2011.
    Butman SM
    Postgrad Med; 2011 Mar; 123(2):95-103. PubMed ID: 21474897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Myocardial revascularization by percutaneous coronary intervention: past, present, and the future.
    Singh IM; Holmes DR
    Curr Probl Cardiol; 2011 Oct; 36(10):375-401. PubMed ID: 21889660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Expert consensus (SBC/SBHCI) on the use of drug-eluting stents: recommendations of the Brazilian society of interventional cardiology/ Brazilian society of cardiology for the Brazilian public single healthcare system.
    Lima VC; Mattos LA; Caramori PR; Perin MA; Mangione JA; Machado BM; Coelho WM; Bueno RR
    Arq Bras Cardiol; 2006 Oct; 87(4):e162-7. PubMed ID: 17128305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Differences in restenosis propensity of devices for transluminal coronary intervention. A quantitative angiographic comparison of balloon angioplasty, directional atherectomy, stent implantation and excimer laser angioplasty. CARPORT, MERCATOR, MARCATOR, PARK, and BENESTENT Trial Groups.
    Foley DP; Melkert R; Umans VA; de Jaegere PP; Strikwerda S; de Feyter PJ; Serruys PW
    Eur Heart J; 1995 Oct; 16(10):1331-46. PubMed ID: 8746901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Contemporary percutaneous coronary intervention versus balloon angioplasty for multivessel coronary artery disease: a comparison of the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute Dynamic Registry and the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation (BARI) study.
    Srinivas VS; Brooks MM; Detre KM; King SB; Jacobs AK; Johnston J; Williams DO
    Circulation; 2002 Sep; 106(13):1627-33. PubMed ID: 12270854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty for treatment of coronary disease].
    Witkowski A; Poloński L
    Kardiol Pol; 2005 Nov; 63(5 Suppl 3):S509-42. PubMed ID: 20527387
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Hybrid coronary revascularization: which patients? When? How?
    Bonatti J; Lehr E; Vesely MR; Friedrich G; Bonaros N; Zimrin D
    Curr Opin Cardiol; 2010 Nov; 25(6):568-74. PubMed ID: 20885316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The challenges of chronic total coronary occlusions: an old problem in a new perspective.
    Kandzari DE
    J Interv Cardiol; 2004 Aug; 17(4):259-67. PubMed ID: 15318898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. His master's art, Andreas Grüntzig's approach to performing and teaching coronary angioplasty.
    Meier B
    EuroIntervention; 2017 May; 13(1):15-27. PubMed ID: 28504214
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Revascularization therapy for coronary artery disease. Coronary artery bypass grafting versus percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty.
    Wilson JM; Ferguson JJ
    Tex Heart Inst J; 1995; 22(2):145-61. PubMed ID: 7647598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Role of the different percutaneous revascularization techniques in single and multivessel coronary artery disease.
    Corcos T; Zimarino M; Tamburino C; Favereau X
    Cardiologia; 1993 Dec; 38(12 Suppl 1):383-95. PubMed ID: 8020040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mechanical rotational atherectomy.
    O'Neill WW
    Am J Cardiol; 1992 May; 69(15):12F-18F. PubMed ID: 1621645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Concurrent robotic hybrid revascularization using an enhanced operative suite.
    Kiaii B; McClure RS; Kostuk WJ; Rayman R; Swinamer S; Dobkowski WB; Novick RJ
    Chest; 2005 Dec; 128(6):4046-8. PubMed ID: 16354880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Integrated coronary revascularization.
    Cohen HA; Zenati M
    J Invasive Cardiol; 1999 Mar; 11(3):184-90; discussion 190-1. PubMed ID: 10745509
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. From metallic cages to transient bioresorbable scaffolds: change in paradigm of coronary revascularization in the upcoming decade?
    Serruys PW; Garcia-Garcia HM; Onuma Y
    Eur Heart J; 2012 Jan; 33(1):16-25b. PubMed ID: 22041548
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The impact of hybrid coronary revascularization on hospital costs and reimbursements.
    Halkos ME; Ford L; Peterson D; Bluestein SM; Liberman HA; Kilgo P; Puskas JD; Guyton RA; Chowdhury R
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2014 May; 97(5):1610-5; discussion 1615-6. PubMed ID: 24636706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Revascularisation for acute coronary syndromes: PCI or CABG?
    Gunn J; Taggart DP
    Heart; 2003 Sep; 89(9):967-70. PubMed ID: 12922989
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evolving revascularization approaches for myocardial ischemia.
    Kleiman NS; Patel NC; Allen KB; Simons M; Ylä-Herttuala S; Griffin E; Dzau VJ
    Am J Cardiol; 2003 Nov; 92(9B):9N-17N. PubMed ID: 14615021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.