174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17284696)
1. Association between unreported outcomes and effect size estimates in Cochrane meta-analyses.
Furukawa TA; Watanabe N; Omori IM; Montori VM; Guyatt GH
JAMA; 2007 Feb; 297(5):468-70. PubMed ID: 17284696
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Robustness assessments are needed to reduce bias in meta-analyses that include zero-event randomized trials.
Keus F; Wetterslev J; Gluud C; Gooszen HG; van Laarhoven CJ
Am J Gastroenterol; 2009 Mar; 104(3):546-51. PubMed ID: 19262513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Standardized mean differences in individually-randomized and cluster-randomized trials, with applications to meta-analysis.
White IR; Thomas J
Clin Trials; 2005; 2(2):141-51. PubMed ID: 16279136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Single-center trials show larger treatment effects than multicenter trials: evidence from a meta-epidemiologic study.
Dechartres A; Boutron I; Trinquart L; Charles P; Ravaud P
Ann Intern Med; 2011 Jul; 155(1):39-51. PubMed ID: 21727292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A meta-epidemiological study to examine the association between bias and treatment effects in neonatal trials.
Bialy L; Vandermeer B; Lacaze-Masmonteil T; Dryden DM; Hartling L
Evid Based Child Health; 2014 Dec; 9(4):1052-9. PubMed ID: 25504975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of allocation concealment on conclusions drawn from meta-analyses of randomized trials.
Pildal J; Hróbjartsson A; Jørgensen KJ; Hilden J; Altman DG; Gøtzsche PC
Int J Epidemiol; 2007 Aug; 36(4):847-57. PubMed ID: 17517809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Researcher allegiance in psychotherapy outcome research: an overview of reviews.
Munder T; Brütsch O; Leonhart R; Gerger H; Barth J
Clin Psychol Rev; 2013 Jun; 33(4):501-11. PubMed ID: 23500154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Trial sequential analyses of meta-analyses of complications in laparoscopic vs. small-incision cholecystectomy: more randomized patients are needed.
Keus F; Wetterslev J; Gluud C; Gooszen HG; van Laarhoven CJ
J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 Mar; 63(3):246-56. PubMed ID: 20004553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. PEDro's bias: summary quality scores should not be used in meta-analysis.
da Costa BR; Hilfiker R; Egger M
J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Jan; 66(1):75-7. PubMed ID: 23177896
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Danger of misuse of meta-analyses for observational studies based on published data.
Sauerbrei W; Blettner M
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2000; 77():33. PubMed ID: 11187567
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Association of funding and conclusions in randomized drug trials: a reflection of treatment effect or adverse events?
Als-Nielsen B; Chen W; Gluud C; Kjaergard LL
JAMA; 2003 Aug; 290(7):921-8. PubMed ID: 12928469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Use of re-randomized data in meta-analysis.
Hozo I; Djulbegovic B; Clark O; Lyman GH
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2005 May; 5():17. PubMed ID: 15882470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [A wide perspective on meta-analysis--may be of crucial significance for the patients].
Gøtzsche PC
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2000 Sep; 120(23):2810. PubMed ID: 11107932
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Ratio of means for analyzing continuous outcomes in meta-analysis performed as well as mean difference methods.
Friedrich JO; Adhikari NK; Beyene J
J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 May; 64(5):556-64. PubMed ID: 21447428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Bias and trials stopped early for benefit.
Goodman S; Berry D; Wittes J
JAMA; 2010 Jul; 304(2):157; author reply 158-9. PubMed ID: 20628126
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Considerations for planning and designing meta-analysis in oral medicine.
Pinto A
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2013 Aug; 116(2):194-202. PubMed ID: 23663987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Importance of a wide perspective on meta-analysis. It may be of crucial significance for the patients].
Gøtzsche PC
Ugeskr Laeger; 2000 Oct; 162(42):5601. PubMed ID: 11059294
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Forest plots.
Verhagen AP; Ferreira ML
J Physiother; 2014 Sep; 60(3):170-3. PubMed ID: 25084633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of Risk of Bias on the Effect Size of Meta-Analytic Estimates in Randomized Controlled Trials in Periodontology and Implant Dentistry.
Faggion CM; Wu YC; Scheidgen M; Tu YK
PLoS One; 2015; 10(9):e0139030. PubMed ID: 26422698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Meta-analyses of chronic disease trials with competing causes of death may yield biased odds ratios.
Koller MT; Stijnen T; Steyerberg EW; Lubsen J
J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Apr; 61(4):365-72. PubMed ID: 18313561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
