174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17284696)
21. Assuring that double-blind is blind.
Perlis RH; Ostacher M; Fava M; Nierenberg AA; Sachs GS; Rosenbaum JF
Am J Psychiatry; 2010 Mar; 167(3):250-2. PubMed ID: 20194487
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. A critical review of methods for the assessment of patient-level interactions in individual participant data meta-analysis of randomized trials, and guidance for practitioners.
Fisher DJ; Copas AJ; Tierney JF; Parmar MK
J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Sep; 64(9):949-67. PubMed ID: 21411280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Randomized trials, generalizability, and meta-analysis: graphical insights for binary outcomes.
Baker SG; Kramer BS
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2003 Jun; 3():10. PubMed ID: 12809566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Optimal information size in trial sequential analysis of time-to-event outcomes reveals potentially inconclusive results because of the risk of random error.
Miladinovic B; Mhaskar R; Hozo I; Kumar A; Mahony H; Djulbegovic B
J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Jun; 66(6):654-9. PubMed ID: 23403248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. On responder analyses when a continuous variable is dichotomized and measurement error is present.
Kunz M
Biom J; 2011 Feb; 53(1):137-55. PubMed ID: 21259314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Should meta-analyses of interventions include observational studies in addition to randomized controlled trials? A critical examination of underlying principles.
Shrier I; Boivin JF; Steele RJ; Platt RW; Furlan A; Kakuma R; Brophy J; Rossignol M
Am J Epidemiol; 2007 Nov; 166(10):1203-9. PubMed ID: 17712019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. What's with epidemiologic meta-analyses?
Partanen T
Scand J Work Environ Health; 1996 Aug; 22(4):241-2. PubMed ID: 8881011
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Meta-analysis of raw mean differences.
Bond CF; Wiitala WL; Richard FD
Psychol Methods; 2003 Dec; 8(4):406-18. PubMed ID: 14664679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The simplest statistical test: how to check for a difference between treatments.
Pocock SJ
BMJ; 2006 May; 332(7552):1256-8. PubMed ID: 16735336
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Simple maximum likelihood estimates of efficacy in randomized trials and before-and-after studies, with implications for meta-analysis.
Baker SG; Kramer BS
Stat Methods Med Res; 2005 Aug; 14(4):349-67. PubMed ID: 16178137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Investigating patient exclusion bias in meta-analysis.
Tierney JF; Stewart LA
Int J Epidemiol; 2005 Feb; 34(1):79-87. PubMed ID: 15561753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Meta-analysis: an update.
Sacks HS; Reitman D; Pagano D; Kupelnick B
Mt Sinai J Med; 1996; 63(3-4):216-24. PubMed ID: 8692168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The role of meta-analysis in monitoring clinical trials.
Begg CB
Stat Med; 1996 Jun; 15(12):1299-306; discussion 1307-11. PubMed ID: 8817803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Meta-analysis and meta-analytic monitoring of clinical trials.
Feinstein AR
Stat Med; 1996 Jun; 15(12):1273-80; discussion 1281-3. PubMed ID: 8817801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Graphical methods for detecting bias in meta-analysis.
Ferrer RL
Fam Med; 1998 Sep; 30(8):579-83. PubMed ID: 9773289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Meta-analysis of repeated measures study designs.
Peters JL; Mengersen KL
J Eval Clin Pract; 2008 Oct; 14(5):941-50. PubMed ID: 19018929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of randomized trials: principles and pitfalls.
da Costa BR; Juni P
Eur Heart J; 2014 Dec; 35(47):3336-45. PubMed ID: 25416325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Accounting for uncertainty due to 'last observation carried forward' outcome imputation in a meta-analysis model.
Dimitrakopoulou V; Efthimiou O; Leucht S; Salanti G
Stat Med; 2015 Feb; 34(5):742-52. PubMed ID: 25492741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. How to make sense of clinical research.
Wooten JM; Ross VM
RN; 2005 Jan; 68(1):22-7; quiz 28. PubMed ID: 15742745
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
