242 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17284718)
1. Quality of reporting of cancer prognostic marker studies: association with reported prognostic effect.
Kyzas PA; Denaxa-Kyza D; Ioannidis JP
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2007 Feb; 99(3):236-43. PubMed ID: 17284718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Selective reporting biases in cancer prognostic factor studies.
Kyzas PA; Loizou KT; Ioannidis JP
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2005 Jul; 97(14):1043-55. PubMed ID: 16030302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of long-term exposure to traffic-related air pollution on respiratory and cardiovascular mortality in the Netherlands: the NLCS-AIR study.
Brunekreef B; Beelen R; Hoek G; Schouten L; Bausch-Goldbohm S; Fischer P; Armstrong B; Hughes E; Jerrett M; van den Brandt P
Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2009 Mar; (139):5-71; discussion 73-89. PubMed ID: 19554969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessing the reporting and scientific quality of meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials of treatments for anxiety disorders.
Bereza BG; Machado M; Einarson TR
Ann Pharmacother; 2008 Oct; 42(10):1402-9. PubMed ID: 18728102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Almost all articles on cancer prognostic markers report statistically significant results.
Kyzas PA; Denaxa-Kyza D; Ioannidis JP
Eur J Cancer; 2007 Nov; 43(17):2559-79. PubMed ID: 17981458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Extended follow-up and spatial analysis of the American Cancer Society study linking particulate air pollution and mortality.
Krewski D; Jerrett M; Burnett RT; Ma R; Hughes E; Shi Y; Turner MC; Pope CA; Thurston G; Calle EE; Thun MJ; Beckerman B; DeLuca P; Finkelstein N; Ito K; Moore DK; Newbold KB; Ramsay T; Ross Z; Shin H; Tempalski B
Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2009 May; (140):5-114; discussion 115-36. PubMed ID: 19627030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Is GERD a risk factor for laryngeal cancer?
Qadeer MA; Colabianchi N; Vaezi MF
Laryngoscope; 2005 Mar; 115(3):486-91. PubMed ID: 15744163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. One relative risk versus two odds ratios: implications for meta-analyses involving paired and unpaired binary data.
Zou GY
Clin Trials; 2007; 4(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 17327243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Extreme between-study homogeneity in meta-analyses could offer useful insights.
Ioannidis JP; Trikalinos TA; Zintzaras E
J Clin Epidemiol; 2006 Oct; 59(10):1023-32. PubMed ID: 16980141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Update of potency factors for asbestos-related lung cancer and mesothelioma.
Berman DW; Crump KS
Crit Rev Toxicol; 2008; 38 Suppl 1():1-47. PubMed ID: 18671157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Each portion of fruit or vegetable consumed halves the risk of oral cancer.
Conway DI
Evid Based Dent; 2007; 8(1):19-20. PubMed ID: 17380179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Statistical methods for assessing the influence of study characteristics on treatment effects in 'meta-epidemiological' research.
Sterne JA; Jüni P; Schulz KF; Altman DG; Bartlett C; Egger M
Stat Med; 2002 Jun; 21(11):1513-24. PubMed ID: 12111917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Benefits and risks of adjunctive inhaled corticosteroids in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a meta-analysis.
Sobieraj DM; White CM; Coleman CI
Clin Ther; 2008 Aug; 30(8):1416-25. PubMed ID: 18803985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Meta-analysis in occupational epidemiology: a review of practice.
McElvenny DM; Armstrong BG; Järup L; Higgins JP
Occup Med (Lond); 2004 Aug; 54(5):336-44. PubMed ID: 15289591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Searching one or two databases was insufficient for meta-analysis of observational studies.
Lemeshow AR; Blum RE; Berlin JA; Stoto MA; Colditz GA
J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Sep; 58(9):867-73. PubMed ID: 16085190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prognostic significance of p16 INK4a alteration for Ewing sarcoma: a meta-analysis.
Honoki K; Stojanovski E; McEvoy M; Fujii H; Tsujiuchi T; Kido A; Takakura Y; Attia J
Cancer; 2007 Sep; 110(6):1351-60. PubMed ID: 17661343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A systematic evaluation of the quality of meta-analyses in the critical care literature.
Delaney A; Bagshaw SM; Ferland A; Manns B; Laupland KB; Doig CJ
Crit Care; 2005 Oct; 9(5):R575-82. PubMed ID: 16277721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of excess statistical significance in meta-analyses of 98 biomarker associations with cancer risk.
Tsilidis KK; Papatheodorou SI; Evangelou E; Ioannidis JP
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2012 Dec; 104(24):1867-78. PubMed ID: 23090067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Improvement in the quality of randomized controlled trials among general anesthesiology journals 2000 to 2006: a 6-year follow-up.
Greenfield ML; Mhyre JM; Mashour GA; Blum JM; Yen EC; Rosenberg AL
Anesth Analg; 2009 Jun; 108(6):1916-21. PubMed ID: 19448222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
