BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17286155)

  • 41. Allergic contact dermatitis to cocamidopropylbetaine in hair shampoo.
    Brand R; Delaney TA
    Australas J Dermatol; 1998 May; 39(2):121-2. PubMed ID: 9611386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Alternatives for Allergens in the 2018 American Contact Dermatitis Society Core Series: Report by the American Contact Alternatives Group.
    Scheman A; Hylwa-Deufel S; Jacob SE; Katta R; Nedorost S; Warshaw E; Eifrid K; Geiser AJ; McGaughey L; Scheman N; Kimyon R; Rundle C; Shaver R
    Dermatitis; 2019; 30(2):87-105. PubMed ID: 30870231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Allergic contact dermatitis from cocamidopropyl betaine, cocamidoamine, 3-(dimethylamino)propylamine, and oleamidopropyl dimethylamine: co-reactions or cross-reactions?
    Moreau L; Sasseville D
    Dermatitis; 2004 Sep; 15(3):146-9. PubMed ID: 15724349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Contact allergy to individual fragrance mix constituents in relation to primary site of dermatitis.
    Buckley DA; Rycroft RJ; White IR; McFadden JP
    Contact Dermatitis; 2000 Nov; 43(5):304-5. PubMed ID: 11016673
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Contact Allergy: alternatives for the 2007 North American contact dermatitis group (NACDG) Standard Screening Tray.
    Scheman A; Jacob S; Zirwas M; Warshaw E; Nedorost S; Katta R; Cook J; Castanedo-Tardan MP
    Dis Mon; 2008; 54(1-2):7-156. PubMed ID: 18215657
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Allergic contact dermatitis to tea tree oil with erythema multiforme-like id reaction.
    Khanna M; Qasem K; Sasseville D
    Am J Contact Dermat; 2000 Dec; 11(4):238-42. PubMed ID: 11123417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Contact sensitization to fragrances other than fragrance mix I in China.
    Liu J; Li LF
    Contact Dermatitis; 2015 Oct; 73(4):252-3. PubMed ID: 26094488
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Patch-testing North American lip dermatitis patients: data from the North American Contact Dermatitis Group, 2001 to 2004.
    Zug KA; Kornik R; Belsito DV; DeLeo VA; Fowler JF; Maibach HI; Marks JG; Mathias CG; Pratt MD; Rietschel RL; Sasseville D; Storrs FJ; Taylor JS; Warshaw EM;
    Dermatitis; 2008; 19(4):202-8. PubMed ID: 18674455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Path test reactions to the Chinese Standard Screening Allergens in 1,135 patients investigated for allergic contact dermatitis.
    Liu YQ; Zhao B; Zhuang LH; Fan WX
    Am J Contact Dermat; 1997 Sep; 8(3):141-3. PubMed ID: 9249281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Contact Dermatitis: Emerging Trends.
    Milam EC; Cohen DE
    Dermatol Clin; 2019 Jan; 37(1):21-28. PubMed ID: 30466685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Allergenicity and cross-reactivity of coconut oil derivatives: A double-blind randomized controlled pilot study.
    Shaffer KK; Jaimes JP; Hordinsky MK; Zielke GR; Warshaw EM
    Dermatitis; 2006 Jun; 17(2):71-6. PubMed ID: 16956456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. A diagnostic pearl in allergic contact dermatitis to fragrances: the atomizer sign.
    Jacob SE; Castanedo-Tardan MP
    Cutis; 2008 Nov; 82(5):317-8. PubMed ID: 19090333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Fragrance series testing in eyelid dermatitis.
    Wenk KS; Ehrlich A
    Dermatitis; 2012; 23(1):22-6. PubMed ID: 22653065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Relevance of positive patch-test reactions to cocamidopropyl betaine and amidoamine.
    Brey NL; Fowler JF
    Dermatitis; 2004 Mar; 15(1):7-9. PubMed ID: 15573642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. A case of allergic contact dermatitis to polyglyceryl laurate.
    Washizaki K; Kanto H; Yazaki S; Ito M
    Contact Dermatitis; 2008 Mar; 58(3):187-8. PubMed ID: 18279173
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Patch-test results of the North American Contact Dermatitis Group 2005-2006.
    Zug KA; Warshaw EM; Fowler JF; Maibach HI; Belsito DL; Pratt MD; Sasseville D; Storrs FJ; Taylor JS; Mathias CG; Deleo VA; Rietschel RL; Marks J
    Dermatitis; 2009; 20(3):149-60. PubMed ID: 19470301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Majantol.
    Herro E; Jacob SE
    Dermatitis; 2011; 22(2):112-3. PubMed ID: 21504697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Contact allergy in chronic leg ulcers: results of a multicentre study carried out in 423 patients and proposal for an updated series of patch tests.
    Barbaud A; Collet E; Le Coz CJ; Meaume S; Gillois P
    Contact Dermatitis; 2009 May; 60(5):279-87. PubMed ID: 19397620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Allergic contact dermatitis in 191 consecutively patch tested children.
    Lewis VJ; Statham BN; Chowdhury MM
    Contact Dermatitis; 2004 Sep; 51(3):155-6. PubMed ID: 15479212
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. [Contact allergy to 3-dimethylaminopropylamine and cocamidopropyl betaine].
    Hervella M; Yanguas JI; Iglesias ME; Larrea M; Ros C; Gallego M
    Actas Dermosifiliogr; 2006 Apr; 97(3):189-95. PubMed ID: 16796966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.