These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Quasi-species evolution maximizes genotypic reproductive value (not fitness or flatness). Smerlak M J Theor Biol; 2021 Aug; 522():110699. PubMed ID: 33794289 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of lethality on the extinction and on the error threshold of quasispecies. Tejero H; Marín A; Montero F J Theor Biol; 2010 Feb; 262(4):733-41. PubMed ID: 19833133 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Viral replication modes in single-peak fitness landscapes: A dynamical systems analysis. Fornés J; Tomás Lázaro J; Alarcón T; Elena SF; Sardanyés J J Theor Biol; 2019 Jan; 460():170-183. PubMed ID: 30300648 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Error thresholds for quasispecies on dynamic fitness landscapes. Nilsson M; Snoad N Phys Rev Lett; 2000 Jan; 84(1):191-4. PubMed ID: 11015867 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Rational evolutionary design: the theory of in vitro protein evolution. Voigt CA; Kauffman S; Wang ZG Adv Protein Chem; 2000; 55():79-160. PubMed ID: 11050933 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Mapping the Peaks: Fitness Landscapes of the Fittest and the Flattest. Franklin J; LaBar T; Adami C Artif Life; 2019; 25(3):250-262. PubMed ID: 31397601 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Analysis of epistatic interactions and fitness landscapes using a new geometric approach. Beerenwinkel N; Pachter L; Sturmfels B; Elena SF; Lenski RE BMC Evol Biol; 2007 Apr; 7():60. PubMed ID: 17433106 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Looking for the optimal rate of recombination for evolutionary dynamics. Saakian DB Phys Rev E; 2018 Jan; 97(1-1):012409. PubMed ID: 29448332 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Replication and mutation on neutral networks. Reidys C; Forst CV; Schuster P Bull Math Biol; 2001 Jan; 63(1):57-94. PubMed ID: 11146884 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Error thresholds in a mutation-selection model with Hopfield-type fitness. Garske T Bull Math Biol; 2006 Oct; 68(7):1715-46. PubMed ID: 16841266 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Mathematical modeling of evolution. Solved and open problems. Schuster P Theory Biosci; 2011 Mar; 130(1):71-89. PubMed ID: 20809365 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Average Fitness Differences on NK Landscapes. Hordijk W; Kauffman SA; Stadler PF Theory Biosci; 2020 Feb; 139(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 31214941 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Error thresholds in genetic algorithms. Ochoa G Evol Comput; 2006; 14(2):157-82. PubMed ID: 16831105 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Greedy adaptive walks on a correlated fitness landscape. Park SC; Neidhart J; Krug J J Theor Biol; 2016 May; 397():89-102. PubMed ID: 26953649 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Error thresholds for quasispecies on single peak Gaussian-distributed fitness landscapes. Feng X; Li Y; Gu J; Zhuo Y; Yang H J Theor Biol; 2007 May; 246(1):28-32. PubMed ID: 17241644 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evolution of digital organisms at high mutation rates leads to survival of the flattest. Wilke CO; Wang JL; Ofria C; Lenski RE; Adami C Nature; 2001 Jul; 412(6844):331-3. PubMed ID: 11460163 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]