These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17288324)

  • 21. Effect of surface treatments and different adhesives on the hybrid layer thickness of non-carious cervical lesions.
    Eliguzeloglu E; Omurlu H; Eskitascioglu G; Belli S
    Oper Dent; 2008; 33(3):338-45. PubMed ID: 18505226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Microleakage of resin-based composite restorations using different solvent-based bonding agents and methods of drying acid-etched dentin.
    Santini A
    Am J Dent; 1999 Aug; 12(4):194-200. PubMed ID: 10649927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Microleakage of endodontically treated teeth restored with 3 different adhesive systems and 4 different fiber-reinforced posts.
    Başaran EG; Ayna E; Halifeoğlu M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Apr; 107(4):239-51. PubMed ID: 22475467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. An in vitro investigation of a comparison of bond strengths of composite to etched and air-abraded human enamel surfaces.
    Gray GB; Carey GP; Jagger DC
    J Prosthodont; 2006; 15(1):2-8. PubMed ID: 16433645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effects of sodium ascorbate on microtensile bond strength of total-etching adhesive system to NaOCl treated dentine.
    Vongphan N; Senawongse P; Somsiri W; Harnirattisai C
    J Dent; 2005 Sep; 33(8):689-95. PubMed ID: 16139700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Marginal adaptation of Class 5 composite restorations: retention grooves versus enamel and dentin bonding.
    Farid MR; Gomaa HM
    Egypt Dent J; 1995 Jul; 41(3):1271-5. PubMed ID: 9497668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Microleakage of tetric ceram/excite and Ariston pHc/Ariston liner.
    Santini A; Plasschaert AJ; Mitchell S
    Am J Dent; 2001 Oct; 14(5):309-13. PubMed ID: 11803996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. An in vivo evaluation of bonding ability of comprehensive antibacterial adhesive system incorporating MDPB.
    Imazato S; Tay FR; Kaneshiro AV; Takahashi Y; Ebisu S
    Dent Mater; 2007 Feb; 23(2):170-6. PubMed ID: 16469372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A comparison of three resin bonding agents to primary tooth dentin.
    de Araujo FB; García-Godoy F; Issáo M
    Pediatr Dent; 1997; 19(4):253-7. PubMed ID: 9200196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Microleakage evaluation of a flowable polyacid-modified resin composite used as fissure sealant on air-abraded permanent teeth.
    Güngör HC; Turgut MD; Attar N; Altay N
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(3):267-73. PubMed ID: 12760698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Resin bond strength with different methods to remove excess water from the dentin.
    De Goes MF; Pachane GC; García-Godoy F
    Am J Dent; 1997 Dec; 10(6):298-301. PubMed ID: 9590921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Marginal permeability of self-etch and total-etch adhesive systems.
    Owens BM; Johnson WW; Harris EF
    Oper Dent; 2006; 31(1):60-7. PubMed ID: 16536195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Microleakage of composite resin restorations in cervical cavities prepared by Er,Cr:YSGG laser radiation.
    Shahabi S; Ebrahimpour L; Walsh LJ
    Aust Dent J; 2008 Jun; 53(2):172-5. PubMed ID: 18494974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Microleakage of light-cured resin and resin-modified glass-ionomer dentin bonding agents applied with co-cure vs pre-cure technique.
    Tulunoglu O; Uçtaşh M; Alaçam A; Omürlü H
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):292-8. PubMed ID: 11203833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effect of sodium ascorbate on bond strength of different adhesive systems to NaOCl-treated dentin.
    Celik C; Erkut S; Gulsahi K; Yamanel K; Kucukesmen C
    Aust Endod J; 2010 Apr; 36(1):12-8. PubMed ID: 20377558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Marginal adaptation and microtensile bond strength of composite indirect restorations bonded to dentin treated with adhesive and low-viscosity composite.
    de Andrade OS; de Goes MF; Montes MA
    Dent Mater; 2007 Mar; 23(3):279-87. PubMed ID: 16546249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The effect of occlusal loading on the microleakage of class V restorations.
    Arisu HD; Uçtasli MB; Eligüzeloglu E; Ozcan S; Omürlü H
    Oper Dent; 2008; 33(2):135-41. PubMed ID: 18435186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Laboratory evaluation of compomers in Class V restorations.
    Chersoni S; Lorenzi R; Ferrieri P; Prati C
    Am J Dent; 1997 Jun; 10(3):147-51. PubMed ID: 9545890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effect of sodium hypochlorite on primary dentin--a scanning electron microscopy (SEM) evaluation.
    Correr GM; Alonso RC; Grando MF; Borges AF; Puppin-Rontani RM
    J Dent; 2006 Aug; 34(7):454-9. PubMed ID: 16310920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effect of laser pretreated enamel and dentin of primary teeth on microleakage of different restorative materials.
    Salama FS
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1998; 22(4):285-91. PubMed ID: 9796497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.