95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17288596)
1. Introduction of the Thin Prep Imaging System (TIS): experience in a high volume academic practice.
Chivukula M; Saad RS; Elishaev E; White S; Mauser N; Dabbs DJ
Cytojournal; 2007 Feb; 4():6. PubMed ID: 17288596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of Thin Prep(®) imaging system on laboratory rate and relative sensitivity of atypical squamous cells, high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion not excluded and high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion interpretations.
Koltz BR; Russell DK; Lu N; Bonfiglio TA; Varghese S
Cytojournal; 2013; 10():6. PubMed ID: 23599725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Implementation of the ThinPrep imaging system in a high-volume metropolitan laboratory.
Miller FS; Nagel LE; Kenny-Moynihan MB
Diagn Cytopathol; 2007 Apr; 35(4):213-7. PubMed ID: 17351933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Utility of the Thin Prep Imaging System® in the detection of squamous intraepithelial abnormalities on retrospective evaluation: can we trust the imager?
Barroeta JE; Reilly ME; Steinhoff MM; Lawrence WD
Diagn Cytopathol; 2012 Feb; 40(2):124-7. PubMed ID: 22246928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Does total manual rescreening of negative pap tests screened by the ThinPrep imaging system add any value?
Martin EL; Michael CW; Bomeisl PE; Shyu S; Wasman JK
Diagn Cytopathol; 2014 Oct; 42(10):834-9. PubMed ID: 24554347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assisted primary screening using the automated ThinPrep Imaging System.
Biscotti CV; Dawson AE; Dziura B; Galup L; Darragh T; Rahemtulla A; Wills-Frank L
Am J Clin Pathol; 2005 Feb; 123(2):281-7. PubMed ID: 15842055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Use of the ThinPrep Imaging System does not alter the frequency of interpreting Papanicolaou tests as atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance.
Thrall MJ; Russell DK; Bonfiglio TA; Hoda RS
Cytojournal; 2008 Apr; 5():10. PubMed ID: 18435848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Very low human Papillomavirus DNA prevalence in mature women with negative computer-imaged liquid-based Pap tests.
Zhao C; Elishaev E; Yuan KH; Yu J; Austin RM
Cancer; 2007 Oct; 111(5):292-7. PubMed ID: 17879368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Use of the ThinPrep Imaging System for internal quality control of cervical cytology.
Heard T; Chandra A; Culora G; Gupta SS; Herbert A; Morgan M
Cytopathology; 2013 Aug; 24(4):246-53. PubMed ID: 22937891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. ThinPrep® imaging system-assisted vs manual screening of urinary cytology slides in the detection of the "suspicious for high-grade urothelial carcinoma" category.
Piaton E; Prat JJ; Nennig C; Hutin K; Colombel M; Ruffion A
Cytopathology; 2022 Nov; 33(6):716-724. PubMed ID: 36004492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of cytotechnologists' and cytopathologists' ASCUS rates preimplementation and postimplementation of the ThinPrep® imaging system.
Selvaggi SM
Diagn Cytopathol; 2015 Feb; 43(2):105-7. PubMed ID: 24962256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Is there a role for the thinprep imaging system in reporting anal cytology?
Margaret Roberts J; Jin F; Ekman D; Kay Adams M; Lindsay McDonald R; Kathleen Thurloe J; Richards A; Mary Poynten I; Law C; Kincaid Fairley C; John Hillman R; Tabrizi SN; Marie Cornall A; James Templeton D; Marie Garland S; Edwin Grulich A; Farnsworth A
Diagn Cytopathol; 2016 May; 44(5):384-8. PubMed ID: 26876374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Low-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion or High-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion? Concordance Between the Interpretation of Low-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion and High-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion in Papanicolaou Tests: Results From the College of American Pathologists PAP Education Program.
Crothers BA; Ghofrani M; Zhao C; Dodd LG; Goodrich K; Husain M; Kurtycz DFI; Russell DK; Shen RZ; Souers RJ; Staats PN; Tabatabai ZL; Witt BL; Davey DD
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2019 Jan; 143(1):81-85. PubMed ID: 30133317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Automated screening versus manual screening: a comparison of the ThinPrep imaging system and manual screening in a time study.
Schledermann D; Hyldebrandt T; Ejersbo D; Hoelund B
Diagn Cytopathol; 2007 Jun; 35(6):348-52. PubMed ID: 17497655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Application of the ThinPrep imaging system in urine cytology: a prospective study.
van Hemel BM; Haarsma JG; Ruitenbeek T; Groen HJ; Suurmeijer AJ
Cancer Cytopathol; 2013 Aug; 121(8):410-4. PubMed ID: 23907818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A three-armed trial of the ThinPrep Imaging System.
Roberts JM; Thurloe JK; Bowditch RC; Hyne SG; Greenberg M; Clarke JM; Biro C
Diagn Cytopathol; 2007 Feb; 35(2):96-102. PubMed ID: 17230572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. High-risk HPV DNA detected in less than 2% of over 25,000 cytology negative imaged liquid-based Pap test samples from women 30 and older.
Bansal M; Austin RM; Zhao C
Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Nov; 115(2):257-61. PubMed ID: 19665217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. ThinPrep Papanicolaou testing to reduce false-negative cervical cytology.
Linder J; Zahniser D
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1998 Feb; 122(2):139-44. PubMed ID: 9499356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Multicenter comparison of manual and automated screening of AutoCyte gynecologic preparations.
Bishop JW; Kaufman RH; Taylor DA
Acta Cytol; 1999; 43(1):34-8. PubMed ID: 9987448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
